Scientific Research On Homosexuality And Its Philosophical Implications, Plus The Roles Of Parenting And “Okonkwo Complex”In Sexual Identity Development

Diana-Abasi Ibanga
{"title":"Scientific Research On Homosexuality And Its Philosophical Implications, Plus The Roles Of Parenting And “Okonkwo Complex”In Sexual Identity Development","authors":"Diana-Abasi Ibanga","doi":"10.9790/0837-2206136169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"-In this study, I aimed to subject to philosophical analysis the scientific data from biological science researches that are conducted into the phenomenon of homosexuality in order to give philosophical interpretation to it thereby establishing the normative values of the scientific findings. From the study, I observed that much of the scientific data on homosexuality established the phenomenon as ingrained in the human biological construct. I argued that although homoeroticism is biological construct of the homosexual, parenting plays significant role in the sexual identity ultimately developed by an individual. I have presented three conceptual frameworks to show how this happens. I determined that homoeroticism and homosexuality are not exactly the same thing; homoeroticism is a biological construct, while homosexuality is a social construct. I also determine that sexual orientation (which results from eros) is not necessarily the same thing as sexual identity (such as homosexuality or heterosexuality, which results from socialization processes). I argued that sexuality is a synthesis of dialectical interactions between the factors internal within and external to the homosexual‟s body; but that the external is conditioned by the internal. I adopted the paradigm of existentialism as the philosophical framework for the analysis. In conclusion, I argued that if the homosexual‟s sexual orientation is native biological construct of his/her body, then the homosexual has no control over his/her sexual orientation. The philosophical implication of that finding is that homoeroticism is facticity; and as facticity the homosexual cannot escape from being homosexual. Despite this, I used the Two-Way Test (TWT) to show that homosexuality is immoral act; although the homosexual is not an immoral person. However, I have demonstrated that the failed moral status of homosexuality is not enough ground to criminalize homosexuality.","PeriodicalId":288320,"journal":{"name":"IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2206136169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

-In this study, I aimed to subject to philosophical analysis the scientific data from biological science researches that are conducted into the phenomenon of homosexuality in order to give philosophical interpretation to it thereby establishing the normative values of the scientific findings. From the study, I observed that much of the scientific data on homosexuality established the phenomenon as ingrained in the human biological construct. I argued that although homoeroticism is biological construct of the homosexual, parenting plays significant role in the sexual identity ultimately developed by an individual. I have presented three conceptual frameworks to show how this happens. I determined that homoeroticism and homosexuality are not exactly the same thing; homoeroticism is a biological construct, while homosexuality is a social construct. I also determine that sexual orientation (which results from eros) is not necessarily the same thing as sexual identity (such as homosexuality or heterosexuality, which results from socialization processes). I argued that sexuality is a synthesis of dialectical interactions between the factors internal within and external to the homosexual‟s body; but that the external is conditioned by the internal. I adopted the paradigm of existentialism as the philosophical framework for the analysis. In conclusion, I argued that if the homosexual‟s sexual orientation is native biological construct of his/her body, then the homosexual has no control over his/her sexual orientation. The philosophical implication of that finding is that homoeroticism is facticity; and as facticity the homosexual cannot escape from being homosexual. Despite this, I used the Two-Way Test (TWT) to show that homosexuality is immoral act; although the homosexual is not an immoral person. However, I have demonstrated that the failed moral status of homosexuality is not enough ground to criminalize homosexuality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同性恋及其哲学意义的科学研究,以及父母教养和“奥康科沃情结”在性认同发展中的作用
在这项研究中,我的目的是对同性恋现象进行生物科学研究的科学数据进行哲学分析,以便对其进行哲学解释,从而建立科学发现的规范价值。从这项研究中,我观察到许多关于同性恋的科学数据表明,这种现象在人类生物结构中根深蒂固。我认为,尽管同性恋是同性恋者的生理构造,但父母在个体最终形成的性认同中起着重要作用。我提出了三个概念框架来说明这是如何发生的。我认定同性恋和同性恋并不是一回事;同性恋是一种生物建构,而同性恋是一种社会建构。我还认为,性取向(源于爱欲)与性身份(如同性恋或异性恋,源于社会化过程)不一定是一回事。我认为性是同性恋者身体内外因素辩证互动的综合;而是外在受内在的制约。我采用了存在主义的范式作为分析的哲学框架。总之,我认为,如果同性恋者的性取向是他/她的身体天生的生物构造,那么同性恋者无法控制他/她的性取向。这个发现的哲学含义是同性恋是事实性的;事实上,同性恋者无法逃避同性恋的身份。尽管如此,我还是用双向测试(TWT)来证明同性恋是不道德的行为;虽然同性恋者不是不道德的人。然而,我已经证明,同性恋道德地位的失败不足以成为将同性恋定为犯罪的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Science Curriculum based on STEM Approach with Islamic Perspective and its effect on Improving Love of Learning among 9th students in Gaza. The Role of Women in Selected Batak Toba Songs Based On Gender Equality The Globalization of Citizen Journalism on Internet and in Traditional News Affixes and Tone in Aguata Igbo: A Critical Appraisal Professionalization of Media Practice in Nigeria: An Analytical Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1