Anthropometric and Physical Profile Among the Different Age Groups of Tunisian Tennis Players

Saeed Meflah Alshahrani, A. Salem, A. Zribi, K. Trabelsi, A. Ammar, H. Chtourou
{"title":"Anthropometric and Physical Profile Among the Different Age Groups of Tunisian Tennis Players","authors":"Saeed Meflah Alshahrani, A. Salem, A. Zribi, K. Trabelsi, A. Ammar, H. Chtourou","doi":"10.5812/intjssh-138396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The popularity of Tunisian tennis is on the rise, due to emerging players gaining global recognition, leading to growth and evolution in the sport. In order to optimize training and performance, coaches need valuable information on physical fitness and player profiling. Objectives: The study aimed to investigate the physical profile of Tunisian tennis players in different age groups ranging from 7 to 17 years. Methods: Ten players from the same team were assigned to six age groups (U9-U18); U9 (7.89 ± 0.32), U10 (8.88 ± 0.34), U11 (9.78 ± 0.43), U12 (10.81 ± 0.4), U14 (12.3 ± 0.73), and U18 (14.69 ± 0.95) and were assessed for standing long jump (SLJ), countermovement jump, medicine ball throw (MBT), various sprint distances, agility drills, 20m Shuttle run (20mSRT), and Sit and reach tests. Results: The results showed that U14 and U18 age groups demonstrated better performance than U9 and U10 in jump tests, while U18 and U14 outperformed only U9 in the MBT test. U11 showed better performance than U9 and U10 in sprints, sideways shuffle, and spider drill tests. U9 and U10 had lower performance than U12 in SLJ, 20m sprint, sideways shuffle, and zigzag tests, and U11 outperformed U9 in the SLJ test. U18 and U14 had higher VO2max than U10 and U11, while U12 was higher than U11 only. No difference in flexibility was reported. The centile estimates of physical performances among Tunisian tennis players provide a means to compare individual player test results with the standard performance levels of the group. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study found that 11–17-year-old players exhibited greater physical performance than 7–10-year-old players. However, no age effect was found for flexibility.","PeriodicalId":118920,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sport Studies for Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sport Studies for Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/intjssh-138396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The popularity of Tunisian tennis is on the rise, due to emerging players gaining global recognition, leading to growth and evolution in the sport. In order to optimize training and performance, coaches need valuable information on physical fitness and player profiling. Objectives: The study aimed to investigate the physical profile of Tunisian tennis players in different age groups ranging from 7 to 17 years. Methods: Ten players from the same team were assigned to six age groups (U9-U18); U9 (7.89 ± 0.32), U10 (8.88 ± 0.34), U11 (9.78 ± 0.43), U12 (10.81 ± 0.4), U14 (12.3 ± 0.73), and U18 (14.69 ± 0.95) and were assessed for standing long jump (SLJ), countermovement jump, medicine ball throw (MBT), various sprint distances, agility drills, 20m Shuttle run (20mSRT), and Sit and reach tests. Results: The results showed that U14 and U18 age groups demonstrated better performance than U9 and U10 in jump tests, while U18 and U14 outperformed only U9 in the MBT test. U11 showed better performance than U9 and U10 in sprints, sideways shuffle, and spider drill tests. U9 and U10 had lower performance than U12 in SLJ, 20m sprint, sideways shuffle, and zigzag tests, and U11 outperformed U9 in the SLJ test. U18 and U14 had higher VO2max than U10 and U11, while U12 was higher than U11 only. No difference in flexibility was reported. The centile estimates of physical performances among Tunisian tennis players provide a means to compare individual player test results with the standard performance levels of the group. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study found that 11–17-year-old players exhibited greater physical performance than 7–10-year-old players. However, no age effect was found for flexibility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
突尼斯不同年龄组网球运动员的人体测量和身体特征
背景:突尼斯网球的受欢迎程度正在上升,由于新兴球员获得全球认可,导致这项运动的发展和演变。为了优化训练和表现,教练需要关于身体健康和球员概况的有价值的信息。目的:本研究旨在调查突尼斯7 - 17岁不同年龄组网球运动员的身体状况。方法:10名同队球员分为6个年龄组(u9 ~ u18);U9(7.89±0.32)、U10(8.88±0.34)、U11(9.78±0.43)、U12(10.81±0.4)、U14(12.3±0.73)、U18(14.69±0.95),分别进行立定跳远(SLJ)、反动作跳远、实心球投掷(MBT)、各种冲刺距离、敏捷性训练、20米穿梭跑(20mSRT)、坐位及伸臂测试。结果:U14和U18年龄组在跳跃测试中表现优于U9和U10,而U18和U14年龄组在MBT测试中仅优于U9。U11在短跑、侧滑和蜘蛛训练测试中表现优于U9和U10。U9和U10在SLJ、20米冲刺、侧身洗牌和之字形测试中的表现低于U12,而U11在SLJ测试中的表现优于U9。U18和U14的最大摄氧量高于U10和U11,而U12仅高于U11。柔韧性无差异。突尼斯网球运动员身体表现的百分位数估计值提供了一种方法,可以将个人运动员的测试结果与该组的标准表现水平进行比较。结论:本研究发现,11 - 17岁的球员比7- 10岁的球员表现出更好的身体表现。然而,没有发现年龄对灵活性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Aerobic Exercise on Athletic Performance in Recovered and Uninfected COVID-19 Athletes during Post-COVID-19 Period The Impact of Aerobic Exercise on Athletic Performance in Recovered and Uninfected COVID-19 Athletes during Post-COVID-19 Period The Impact of Resistance Training on IL-6, TNF-a, and CRP Levels in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study Effect of Music and Lemon Aroma on Anaerobic Power and Balance of Athletes After Exhausting Activity The Effect of Various Types of Exercise on Gut Microbiota: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1