STAKEHOLDERS’ PERCEPTION AND WILLINGNESS TO COLLABORATE FOR EFFECTIVE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT IN TRINIDAD

Jeanelle D D Joseph, W. Ganpat
{"title":"STAKEHOLDERS’ PERCEPTION AND WILLINGNESS TO COLLABORATE FOR EFFECTIVE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT IN TRINIDAD","authors":"Jeanelle D D Joseph, W. Ganpat","doi":"10.24212/2179-3565.2018V9I3P3-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proper watershed management is important for several reasons; the latest, and maybe most important, being to help mitigate climate change impacts. For countries with small landmasses and burgeoning populations, watersheds are increasingly at risk of being negatively impacted. The environment and water supply are particularly vulnerable if no actions are taken to manage them properly. This study sought to understand the perceptions of the various stakeholders who interact with the largest and most important watershed in Trinidad; their perceptions of the problems, the causes of the problems and possible solutions. It also investigated their willingness to collaborate on action plans to manage the watershed. A purposive sample of 266 respondents from four stakeholder groups was selected and interviewed using a structured questionnaire; comprising in the main of three perception scales and a modified Wilder Collaboration Factor Inventory. The latter is used to assess stakeholders willingness to collaborate. ANOVA results showed that there were similarities in perceptions to 5 of the 10 identified problems, 7 of the 18 possible causes and 6 of the 10 solutions presented. Such results suggested that there were opportunities for positive intervention and 21.3% of the stakeholders expressed a high level of willingness and a further 69.5% a moderate level of willingness to collaborate on community activities geared toward addressing water management issues. Recommendations included; increased community education on watershed importance, more constructive dialogue among stakeholders to achieve better agreements on the watershed issues and increased engagement with institutional stakeholders who are key to fashioning developmental plans for the watershed.","PeriodicalId":365940,"journal":{"name":"Journal on Innovation and Sustainability. RISUS ISSN 2179-3565","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on Innovation and Sustainability. RISUS ISSN 2179-3565","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24212/2179-3565.2018V9I3P3-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proper watershed management is important for several reasons; the latest, and maybe most important, being to help mitigate climate change impacts. For countries with small landmasses and burgeoning populations, watersheds are increasingly at risk of being negatively impacted. The environment and water supply are particularly vulnerable if no actions are taken to manage them properly. This study sought to understand the perceptions of the various stakeholders who interact with the largest and most important watershed in Trinidad; their perceptions of the problems, the causes of the problems and possible solutions. It also investigated their willingness to collaborate on action plans to manage the watershed. A purposive sample of 266 respondents from four stakeholder groups was selected and interviewed using a structured questionnaire; comprising in the main of three perception scales and a modified Wilder Collaboration Factor Inventory. The latter is used to assess stakeholders willingness to collaborate. ANOVA results showed that there were similarities in perceptions to 5 of the 10 identified problems, 7 of the 18 possible causes and 6 of the 10 solutions presented. Such results suggested that there were opportunities for positive intervention and 21.3% of the stakeholders expressed a high level of willingness and a further 69.5% a moderate level of willingness to collaborate on community activities geared toward addressing water management issues. Recommendations included; increased community education on watershed importance, more constructive dialogue among stakeholders to achieve better agreements on the watershed issues and increased engagement with institutional stakeholders who are key to fashioning developmental plans for the watershed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益相关者对特立尼达有效流域管理的看法和合作意愿
由于几个原因,适当的流域管理很重要;最新的,也许是最重要的,是帮助减轻气候变化的影响。对于陆地面积小、人口迅速增长的国家来说,流域受到负面影响的风险越来越大。如果不采取适当行动加以管理,环境和供水将特别脆弱。本研究旨在了解与特立尼达最大和最重要的分水岭互动的各种利益攸关方的看法;他们对问题的看法,问题的原因和可能的解决办法。它还调查了它们在管理流域的行动计划方面进行合作的意愿。从四个利益相关者群体中选择了266个有目的的样本,并使用结构化问卷进行了访谈;主要包括三个感知量表和一个改进的Wilder协作因素量表。后者用于评估利益相关者的合作意愿。方差分析结果显示,在10个确定的问题中有5个,18个可能的原因中有7个,10个解决方案中有6个存在相似的看法。这些结果表明,存在积极干预的机会,21.3%的利益相关者表达了高度的意愿,另有69.5%的利益相关者表达了中等程度的意愿,愿意在针对解决水管理问题的社区活动中进行合作。建议包括;加强关于流域重要性的社区教育,加强利益攸关方之间的建设性对话,以便就流域问题达成更好的协议,并加强与机构利益攸关方的接触,这些机构利益攸关方是制定流域发展计划的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
REVISIÓN TEÓRICA DE LA DISCAPACIDAD VISUAL, EL PAPEL FUNDAMENTAL DE LA UNIÓN ENTRE LA CREATIVIDAD Y LA EDUCACIÓN NATIONAL CULTURE AND TRANSPARENCY: EVIDENCE FROM ISLAMIC BANKS HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT RANKING: A STUDY OF THE COUNTRIES AT THE IBEROAMERICAN REGION AND ITS CHALLENGES AHEAD ARE INTERACTION LINKAGES BASED ON GEOGRAPHIC PROXIMITY FOCUSED ON DEVELOPMENT OF FIRM’S INNOVATION ACTIVITIES STILL RELEVANT? EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE ICT FIRMS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SALVADOR, BAHIA, BRAZIL USO DE LAS TIC EN LAS EMPRESAS COOPERATIVAS: PROPIEDAD Y GOBIERNO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1