Iatrogenic atrial septal defects after transseptal puncture for percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and their hemodynamic effects.

Ioannis Drosos, R. Rosa, P. Seppelt, S. Cremer, S. Mas-Peiro, K. Hemmann, Jana Oppermann, Recha Blessing, M. Vasa-Nicotera, A. Zeiher, Z. Dimitriadis
{"title":"Iatrogenic atrial septal defects after transseptal puncture for percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and their hemodynamic effects.","authors":"Ioannis Drosos, R. Rosa, P. Seppelt, S. Cremer, S. Mas-Peiro, K. Hemmann, Jana Oppermann, Recha Blessing, M. Vasa-Nicotera, A. Zeiher, Z. Dimitriadis","doi":"10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nPercutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) requires puncture of the interatrial septum. The immediate hemodynamic effects of iatrogenic atrial septal defects (iASD) after LAAO have not been examined so far. We aimed at evaluating these effects through invasive measurements of pressure and oxygen saturation. Moreover, we assessed the incidence of persistent iASD at three months.\n\n\nMETHODS\nForty-eight patients scheduled for percutaneous LAAO were prospectively included in the study. Pressure and oxygen saturation were measured (1) in the right atrium (RA) before transseptal puncture, (2) in the left atrium (LA) through the transseptal sheath after transseptal puncture, (3) in the LA after removal of introducer sheath, and (4) in the RA after removal of introducer sheath. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed at three months to detect iASD.\n\n\nRESULTS\nPressure in the RA increased significantly after removing the introducer sheath (P = 0.034), whereas no difference was found in oxygen saturation in the RA (P = 0.623). Pressure measurement in the LA showed no significant difference after removing the introducer sheath (P = 0.718). Oxygen saturation in the LA also showed no significant difference (P = 0.129). Follow-up transesophageal echocardiogram at 3 months revealed a persistent iASD in 4 patients (8.5 %).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOur study suggests that iASD after percutaneous LAAO does not result in significant shunts directly after the procedure, although a significant increase of mean right atrial pressure can be observed. Persistent iASDs after percutaneous LAAO seem to be relatively rare at three months.","PeriodicalId":285674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC","volume":"19 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.09.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) requires puncture of the interatrial septum. The immediate hemodynamic effects of iatrogenic atrial septal defects (iASD) after LAAO have not been examined so far. We aimed at evaluating these effects through invasive measurements of pressure and oxygen saturation. Moreover, we assessed the incidence of persistent iASD at three months. METHODS Forty-eight patients scheduled for percutaneous LAAO were prospectively included in the study. Pressure and oxygen saturation were measured (1) in the right atrium (RA) before transseptal puncture, (2) in the left atrium (LA) through the transseptal sheath after transseptal puncture, (3) in the LA after removal of introducer sheath, and (4) in the RA after removal of introducer sheath. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed at three months to detect iASD. RESULTS Pressure in the RA increased significantly after removing the introducer sheath (P = 0.034), whereas no difference was found in oxygen saturation in the RA (P = 0.623). Pressure measurement in the LA showed no significant difference after removing the introducer sheath (P = 0.718). Oxygen saturation in the LA also showed no significant difference (P = 0.129). Follow-up transesophageal echocardiogram at 3 months revealed a persistent iASD in 4 patients (8.5 %). CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that iASD after percutaneous LAAO does not result in significant shunts directly after the procedure, although a significant increase of mean right atrial pressure can be observed. Persistent iASDs after percutaneous LAAO seem to be relatively rare at three months.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮左房耳闭塞经房间隔穿刺后医源性房间隔缺损及其血流动力学影响。
背景:经皮左心耳闭塞术(LAAO)需要穿刺房间隔。医源性房间隔缺损(iASD)在LAAO后的立即血流动力学影响尚未被研究。我们旨在通过侵入性测量血压和氧饱和度来评估这些影响。此外,我们评估了3个月时持续性isd的发生率。方法前瞻性纳入48例经皮LAAO患者。测量(1)经间隔穿刺前右心房(RA)的血压和血氧饱和度,(2)经间隔穿刺后经间隔鞘左心房(LA)的血压和血氧饱和度,(3)去除介绍人鞘后左心房(LA)的血压和血氧饱和度,(4)去除介绍人鞘后右心房的血压和血氧饱和度。3个月时进行经食管超声心动图检测isd。结果去除引入器鞘后RA内压力显著升高(P = 0.034), RA内氧饱和度无显著差异(P = 0.623)。取下导管鞘后,LA内压力测量无显著差异(P = 0.718)。血氧饱和度差异无统计学意义(P = 0.129)。随访3个月时经食管超声心动图显示4例患者(8.5%)存在持续性isd。结论我们的研究表明,经皮LAAO术后iASD并不会直接导致明显的分流,尽管可以观察到平均右心房压显著升高。经皮LAAO术后3个月出现持续性ids似乎相对罕见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The interaction effect of grip strength and lung function (especially FVC) on cardiovascular diseases: a prospective cohort study in Jiangsu Province, China. Early identification of STEMI patients with emergency chest pain using lipidomics combined with machine learning. A short P-wave duration is associated with incident heart failure in the elderly: a 15 years follow-up cohort study. Complement use of Chinese herbal medicine after percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective observational study. Iatrogenic atrial septal defects after transseptal puncture for percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and their hemodynamic effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1