Analyzing The Content of Senior High School Textbooks Towards SLA-Based Principles

JMMatai Psdku, Vonny Juliana Ruhulessin
{"title":"Analyzing The Content of Senior High School Textbooks Towards SLA-Based Principles","authors":"JMMatai Psdku, Vonny Juliana Ruhulessin","doi":"10.30598/matail.v1i2.4353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research outlined framework for English textbooks analysis from the perspective of Second Language Acquisition (SLA). The aims are to find out the parts of the material which are in line with SLA principles and the part of the material which are not in line with SLA principles. These parts of the textbooks were analyzed using modified version of Littlejohn’s (materials development in language teaching, 2011) analysis task. The English textbooks were analyzed entitled Pathway to English for Senior high School, published by Erlangga, for Grade X ; XI and XII. The data were assessed by sign, plus point when the features in modified Littlejohn analyzing task are in line with SLA and minus pointwhen they are not. In the data analysis technique, the percentage of initiate shows 99% activity/task initiating learner to respond the instruction which is in line with SLA principles, whilst only 1% is not required respond which are not in line with SLA principles. The part of focus shows plenty activity promoting meaningful task with 51% whilst focus on form with 12%. The part shows that they are in line with SLA principle for giving more focus on meaning. In part of mental operation, the percentage shows most activities covered the features of SLA principles, only 1 % pointed to task which is not line with SLA principles (repeat/reproduce with substitution). In part of who with, individual work dominated the tasks with 60%, individual/pair/group/whole class with 24%, whilst presentation both in group/pair with 2%. In the part of content, the percentage shows most input materials to learners are written content with 90%, output written materials to learners with 57%, whilst input aural material shows only 28% and output aural material shows 24%. The data also shows that 99% the source of the material come from the textbook itself and there is only 1% materials comes from learners. The data of nature content covered non-fiction with 94%, fiction with 6%, and grammar explanation with 20%, song with 4% and learner’s personal information/opinion with 11%. In sum, the content material in the three textbooks are recommended to use both by teacher and learner because they are in with SLA principles.","PeriodicalId":149617,"journal":{"name":"MATAI: International Journal of Language Education","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MATAI: International Journal of Language Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30598/matail.v1i2.4353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research outlined framework for English textbooks analysis from the perspective of Second Language Acquisition (SLA). The aims are to find out the parts of the material which are in line with SLA principles and the part of the material which are not in line with SLA principles. These parts of the textbooks were analyzed using modified version of Littlejohn’s (materials development in language teaching, 2011) analysis task. The English textbooks were analyzed entitled Pathway to English for Senior high School, published by Erlangga, for Grade X ; XI and XII. The data were assessed by sign, plus point when the features in modified Littlejohn analyzing task are in line with SLA and minus pointwhen they are not. In the data analysis technique, the percentage of initiate shows 99% activity/task initiating learner to respond the instruction which is in line with SLA principles, whilst only 1% is not required respond which are not in line with SLA principles. The part of focus shows plenty activity promoting meaningful task with 51% whilst focus on form with 12%. The part shows that they are in line with SLA principle for giving more focus on meaning. In part of mental operation, the percentage shows most activities covered the features of SLA principles, only 1 % pointed to task which is not line with SLA principles (repeat/reproduce with substitution). In part of who with, individual work dominated the tasks with 60%, individual/pair/group/whole class with 24%, whilst presentation both in group/pair with 2%. In the part of content, the percentage shows most input materials to learners are written content with 90%, output written materials to learners with 57%, whilst input aural material shows only 28% and output aural material shows 24%. The data also shows that 99% the source of the material come from the textbook itself and there is only 1% materials comes from learners. The data of nature content covered non-fiction with 94%, fiction with 6%, and grammar explanation with 20%, song with 4% and learner’s personal information/opinion with 11%. In sum, the content material in the three textbooks are recommended to use both by teacher and learner because they are in with SLA principles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高中教材内容对基于sla原则的分析
本研究概述了第二语言习得视角下的英语教材分析框架。目的是找出材料中符合SLA原则的部分和不符合SLA原则的部分。这些部分的教科书分析使用修改版的littlejohn(材料开发在语言教学,2011)分析任务。对英语教材进行分析,题目为:Erlangga出版的《高中英语入门》(高二版);十一和十二。修改后的Littlejohn分析任务的特征符合SLA时取加分,不符合SLA时取减分。在数据分析技术中,启动的百分比显示99%的活动/任务启动学习者响应符合SLA原则的指令,而只有1%的活动/任务启动学习者响应不符合SLA原则的指令。注意力部分显示了大量促进有意义任务的活动(51%),而关注形式(12%)。这部分表明,它们符合二语习得原则,更加注重意义。在部分心理操作中,百分比显示大多数活动涵盖了SLA原则的特征,只有1%的活动指向不符合SLA原则的任务(重复/替代再现)。其中,个人作业占60%,个人/结对/小组/全班占24%,而小组/结对展示占2%。在内容部分,百分比显示大部分输入给学习者的材料是书面内容,占90%,输出给学习者的书面材料占57%,而输入的听觉材料仅占28%,输出的听觉材料占24%。数据还显示,99%的材料来源来自教科书本身,只有1%的材料来自学习者。自然内容的数据包括非小说(94%)、小说(6%)、语法解释(20%)、歌曲(4%)和learner个人信息/观点(11%)。总之,这三本教材的内容都是教师和学习者推荐使用的,因为它们符合二语习得原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Writing Summary as An Alternative Strategy To Comprehend The Text Students' Perception of Using Google Meet In English For Advertising Class at Universitas Bhinneka PGRI A Pragmatic Analysis of Deixis and Reference on Kim Hanbin Songs An Analysis of Figurative Language in Poems by Laksmi Pamuntjak The Importance of Teaching Listening Strategies in English Language Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1