29  Ethnic differences in cancer deaths at home before and during pandemic

A. Pring, Marika Kulesza, N. duPreez, N. Bowtell, J. Verne
{"title":"29  Ethnic differences in cancer deaths at home before and during pandemic","authors":"A. Pring, Marika Kulesza, N. duPreez, N. Bowtell, J. Verne","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2023-mcrc.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionPlace of death is a metric used for planning and monitoring palliative care (PC). The COVID-19 pandemic has seen a significant increase in cancer deaths at home.AimsTo determine whether pandemic increases in the percentage of cancer deaths at home differ by ethnic groupMethodsData source: death registrations in England, 2018 to 2021 with underlying cause of death cancer (ICD-10 C00-C97). Ethnic group derived from linked hospital episode data. The age and deprivation distribution across ethnic groups varies and each has a strong independent effect on place of death. so, calculated percentage deaths at home were standardised by these factors to make them comparable. Analysis concentrated on the largest ethnic groups: White, Asian/Asian British (Asian), and Black/African/Caribbean/Black British (Black). Comparisons were made between time periods by analysis of the ratio of percentages 2020–2021 (COVID-19 Pandemic) vs 2018–2019 (Baseline).ResultsFor each ethnic group the age-standardised percentage of cancer deaths at home significantly increased (P < 0.05) from 2018–2019 to 2020–2021Asian: 33.5%, 47.5%Black: 28.8%, 39.0%White: 30.7%, 41.2%The ratio of standardised percentage of deaths at home (95% CI) wasAsian: 1.42 (1.36,1.48 )Black: 1.35 (1.27, 1.44)White 1.34 (1.33, 1.35)ConclusionsCancer deaths at home increased by > 10 percentage points during the pandemic for Asians, Blacks and Whites. Significant differences between ethnic groups before the pandemic (2018–19) persisted with Asians more likely than Whites, and Blacks less likely than Whites to die at home. The largest increase was for Asians, the group with the highest pre-pandemic home deaths.ImpactThese ethnic differences merit investigation regarding cultural preferences, access issues and quality of PC experience. Community health and PC teams need additional resources and training in culturally sensitive care to support the increased number of ethnically diverse cancer patients dying at home.","PeriodicalId":117798,"journal":{"name":"The Marie Curie Research Conference 2023","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Marie Curie Research Conference 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2023-mcrc.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionPlace of death is a metric used for planning and monitoring palliative care (PC). The COVID-19 pandemic has seen a significant increase in cancer deaths at home.AimsTo determine whether pandemic increases in the percentage of cancer deaths at home differ by ethnic groupMethodsData source: death registrations in England, 2018 to 2021 with underlying cause of death cancer (ICD-10 C00-C97). Ethnic group derived from linked hospital episode data. The age and deprivation distribution across ethnic groups varies and each has a strong independent effect on place of death. so, calculated percentage deaths at home were standardised by these factors to make them comparable. Analysis concentrated on the largest ethnic groups: White, Asian/Asian British (Asian), and Black/African/Caribbean/Black British (Black). Comparisons were made between time periods by analysis of the ratio of percentages 2020–2021 (COVID-19 Pandemic) vs 2018–2019 (Baseline).ResultsFor each ethnic group the age-standardised percentage of cancer deaths at home significantly increased (P < 0.05) from 2018–2019 to 2020–2021Asian: 33.5%, 47.5%Black: 28.8%, 39.0%White: 30.7%, 41.2%The ratio of standardised percentage of deaths at home (95% CI) wasAsian: 1.42 (1.36,1.48 )Black: 1.35 (1.27, 1.44)White 1.34 (1.33, 1.35)ConclusionsCancer deaths at home increased by > 10 percentage points during the pandemic for Asians, Blacks and Whites. Significant differences between ethnic groups before the pandemic (2018–19) persisted with Asians more likely than Whites, and Blacks less likely than Whites to die at home. The largest increase was for Asians, the group with the highest pre-pandemic home deaths.ImpactThese ethnic differences merit investigation regarding cultural preferences, access issues and quality of PC experience. Community health and PC teams need additional resources and training in culturally sensitive care to support the increased number of ethnically diverse cancer patients dying at home.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行之前和期间国内癌症死亡的种族差异
死亡地点是用于规划和监测姑息治疗(PC)的指标。2019冠状病毒病大流行导致国内癌症死亡人数大幅增加。目的确定大流行在家庭中癌症死亡百分比的增加是否因种族而不同。方法数据来源:2018年至2021年英国死亡登记,潜在死亡原因为癌症(ICD-10 C00-C97)。种族组来源于相关的医院事件数据。各族裔群体的年龄和贫困分布各不相同,每一种情况对死亡地点都有很强的独立影响。因此,计算出的家庭死亡百分比被这些因素标准化,使它们具有可比性。分析集中在最大的种族群体:白人,亚洲/亚洲英国人(亚洲人)和黑人/非洲/加勒比/黑人英国人(黑人)。通过分析2020-2021年(COVID-19大流行)与2018-2019年(基线)的百分比比率,对不同时期进行了比较。结果从2018-2019年到2020 - 2021年,各族裔家庭癌症死亡率的年龄标准化百分比显著增加(P < 0.05),亚裔:33.5%,47.5%,黑人:28.8%,39.0%,白人:30.7%,41.2%。家庭癌症死亡率的标准化百分比(95% CI)为亚裔:1.42(1.36,1.48)黑人:1.35(1.27,1.44)白人1.34(1.33,1.35)结论在大流行期间,亚洲人、黑人和白人家庭癌症死亡率增加了> 10个百分点。大流行前(2018-19年),种族之间的显著差异仍然存在,亚洲人比白人更可能在家中死亡,黑人比白人更不可能在家中死亡。增幅最大的是亚洲人,这一群体在大流行前的家庭死亡人数最高。这些种族差异值得对文化偏好、访问问题和PC体验质量进行调查。社区卫生和个人护理小组需要更多的资源和文化敏感护理方面的培训,以支持越来越多的不同种族的癌症患者在家中死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
5  Non-invasive technology to assess hydration status in advanced cancer to explore relationships between fluid-status and symptoms at the end-of-life: an observational study using bioelectrical impedance analysis 31  Ambitions for palliative and end of life care: mapping examples of use in practice 21  Understanding the experiences of providing end-of-life care in UK general practices; preliminary data from an independent evaluation of the daffodil standards 10  Empowerment and education for family carers supporting someone at end-of-life: an evaluation of hospice-led community sessions 35  ‘Plugging the gaps’: healthcare professionals’ responses to challenges in providing palliative care out-of-hours in the community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1