Examination Anxiety in Integrated Modular Curriculum: Perceptions of Dental Students

Qasim M. Janjua, Faheem Khan, S. Mukhtar
{"title":"Examination Anxiety in Integrated Modular Curriculum: Perceptions of Dental Students","authors":"Qasim M. Janjua, Faheem Khan, S. Mukhtar","doi":"10.53708/hpej.v5i1.1265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:The universal driving force for learning is assessment, however, it accompanies anxiety, commonly known as exam \nor test anxiety. There is increasing evidence that exam modality and gender play a significant role in generating anxiety in medical students. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of exam anxiety in different assessment modalities with same examination standards and criteria among dental students at University College of Dentistry (UCD), The University of Lahore (UOL). \nMethod:We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey of over 250 dental students from years 1 to 4, at UCD to assess the test anxiety in dental students with different exam modalities. Mann Whitney U test was used to compare the variations of perceptions among male and female students of UCD. Chi-square was used to test for analysis of academic years with different modalities of exams. \nResults:The analysis suggested that “extensive course load” with highest anxiety mean score of 4 was most anxiety provoking followed by “studying all night” (mean score=3) in all assessment modalities. The single most test-anxiety provoking modality was “OSCE station with examiner”, with an average combined mean score of 57, followed by “Long-case” (mean score=56). The data revealed that “psychological issues” (p=0.05), “OSCE station with the examiner” (p=0.02) and “exam taking strategy” (p=0.00) were found statistically significant with respect to genders. The combined score of all exam modalities under the domain of “information needs” was highly significant (p=0.02) with highest mean rank observed in final year dental students followed by 2nd-year students. \nConclusion:We conclude that face-to-face assessments evoke anxiety in students, especially in females. This may be because it also involves confidence and presentation other than theoretical knowledge as in short answer questions (SAQ). The mock assessments shall be made part of the syllabus as this will increase students’ preparedness and will also be helpful for examiners. \n  \nKEYWORDS \nExam, Anxiety, Assessment, Modalities, Dental students","PeriodicalId":338468,"journal":{"name":"Health Professions Educator Journal","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Professions Educator Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53708/hpej.v5i1.1265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction:The universal driving force for learning is assessment, however, it accompanies anxiety, commonly known as exam or test anxiety. There is increasing evidence that exam modality and gender play a significant role in generating anxiety in medical students. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of exam anxiety in different assessment modalities with same examination standards and criteria among dental students at University College of Dentistry (UCD), The University of Lahore (UOL). Method:We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey of over 250 dental students from years 1 to 4, at UCD to assess the test anxiety in dental students with different exam modalities. Mann Whitney U test was used to compare the variations of perceptions among male and female students of UCD. Chi-square was used to test for analysis of academic years with different modalities of exams. Results:The analysis suggested that “extensive course load” with highest anxiety mean score of 4 was most anxiety provoking followed by “studying all night” (mean score=3) in all assessment modalities. The single most test-anxiety provoking modality was “OSCE station with examiner”, with an average combined mean score of 57, followed by “Long-case” (mean score=56). The data revealed that “psychological issues” (p=0.05), “OSCE station with the examiner” (p=0.02) and “exam taking strategy” (p=0.00) were found statistically significant with respect to genders. The combined score of all exam modalities under the domain of “information needs” was highly significant (p=0.02) with highest mean rank observed in final year dental students followed by 2nd-year students. Conclusion:We conclude that face-to-face assessments evoke anxiety in students, especially in females. This may be because it also involves confidence and presentation other than theoretical knowledge as in short answer questions (SAQ). The mock assessments shall be made part of the syllabus as this will increase students’ preparedness and will also be helpful for examiners.   KEYWORDS Exam, Anxiety, Assessment, Modalities, Dental students
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合模块课程中的考试焦虑:牙科学生的认知
导读:学习的普遍驱动力是评估,但它伴随着焦虑,俗称考试焦虑。越来越多的证据表明,考试方式和性别在医学生焦虑的产生中起着重要作用。本研究旨在了解拉合尔大学(UOL)牙科学院(UCD)牙科学生在相同考试标准和标准的不同评估方式下的考试焦虑发生率。方法:采用横断面问卷调查的方法,对UCD一至四年级250多名牙科学生进行调查,评估不同考试方式下牙科学生的考试焦虑状况。采用Mann Whitney U检验比较了UCD男女学生的认知差异。采用卡方法对不同考试方式的学年分析进行检验。结果:分析发现,在所有评估方式中,“课业繁重”最容易引起焦虑,焦虑平均得分最高为4分,其次是“通宵学习”(平均得分为3分)。最能引发考试焦虑的一种方式是“欧安组织站与考官”,平均综合得分为57分,其次是“长案例”(平均得分为56分)。数据显示,“心理问题”(p=0.05)、“欧安组织与考官站”(p=0.02)和“考试策略”(p=0.00)在性别方面具有统计学意义。各考试方式在“信息需求”领域的综合得分极显著(p=0.02),平均排名最高的是大四学生,其次是二年级学生。结论:我们的结论是,面对面的评估会引起学生的焦虑,尤其是女性。这可能是因为它还涉及自信和表达,而不是像简答题(SAQ)那样的理论知识。模拟评估应作为教学大纲的一部分,因为这将增加学生的准备,也将有助于考官。关键词:考试,焦虑,评估,方式,牙科学生
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gender Bias Existence: A Qualitative Exploration of Dental Students’ Perception of the Impact of their Gender on Learning in Clinical Practice Perception of Undergraduate Students about Bedside Teaching: Experience at a Private Medical College Bridging the Gap Between Humanities and Health Sciences – Practices and Recommendations Difficulties faced by Medical Students of Southern Punjab in E-Learning during COVID-19. A Cross-Sectional Study The Missing Piece in Clinical Assessment: Interdependence and Team Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1