Review of Legal Frameworks, Standards and Best Practices in Verification and Assurance for Infrastructure Inspection Robotics

P. Morgan, M. B. Kao, L. Kilvington, R. Alexander, Y. Gheraibia
{"title":"Review of Legal Frameworks, Standards and Best Practices in Verification and Assurance for Infrastructure Inspection Robotics","authors":"P. Morgan, M. B. Kao, L. Kilvington, R. Alexander, Y. Gheraibia","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3645997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this deliverable is to provide a single point of reference on the safety, regulatory and liability issues for operating robots in the European Union. The deliverable describes a state of the art and the well-known normative frameworks for assuring safety on the one hand and examines the regulatory and legal liability issues related to operating robots on the other.<br><br>We organised the report based on the required structure of the deliverable with taking into consideration the different robots technologies, as recognised at the European Union and international level.<br><br>This deliverable is closely related to other deliverables which describe the current state of the arts and normative framework from a different point of view. This review report is intended as a guiding document to be used by all project partners.<br><br>There is currently no single framework to regulate robotics technology in Europe. Different types of robots, depending on where they operate—which Member State and in the air, on land, or in the waters—may be subject to various existing laws or regulations on the international, European Union, Member State levels. The regulations include legal standards and industry guidelines on the robot technologies themselves and on the developers, manufacturers, suppliers, and operators that must be met before these new technologies can be legally and safely deployed. Specific types of robots are subject to different regulatory regimes, and depending on the type of the robot, the applicable regulations may be harmonised across Europe or differ in each Member State.<br><br>Current liability regimes on the EU and Member State levels govern the situations in which the humans associated with the robots are civilly liable for the damage they cause to property or injuries to persons. The appropriate legal regime could be fault-based, strict liability, or product liability depending on the particular circumstances. While existing laws are sufficient to address liability issues given the current state of the technology, further scientific advances that lead to increasingly sophisticated robots may raise problems on how to appropriately assign responsibility.","PeriodicalId":149553,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy - Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy - Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3645997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this deliverable is to provide a single point of reference on the safety, regulatory and liability issues for operating robots in the European Union. The deliverable describes a state of the art and the well-known normative frameworks for assuring safety on the one hand and examines the regulatory and legal liability issues related to operating robots on the other.

We organised the report based on the required structure of the deliverable with taking into consideration the different robots technologies, as recognised at the European Union and international level.

This deliverable is closely related to other deliverables which describe the current state of the arts and normative framework from a different point of view. This review report is intended as a guiding document to be used by all project partners.

There is currently no single framework to regulate robotics technology in Europe. Different types of robots, depending on where they operate—which Member State and in the air, on land, or in the waters—may be subject to various existing laws or regulations on the international, European Union, Member State levels. The regulations include legal standards and industry guidelines on the robot technologies themselves and on the developers, manufacturers, suppliers, and operators that must be met before these new technologies can be legally and safely deployed. Specific types of robots are subject to different regulatory regimes, and depending on the type of the robot, the applicable regulations may be harmonised across Europe or differ in each Member State.

Current liability regimes on the EU and Member State levels govern the situations in which the humans associated with the robots are civilly liable for the damage they cause to property or injuries to persons. The appropriate legal regime could be fault-based, strict liability, or product liability depending on the particular circumstances. While existing laws are sufficient to address liability issues given the current state of the technology, further scientific advances that lead to increasingly sophisticated robots may raise problems on how to appropriately assign responsibility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基础设施检查机器人验证和保证的法律框架、标准和最佳实践综述
本可交付成果的目的是为欧盟操作机器人的安全,监管和责任问题提供单一参考点。交付成果一方面描述了确保安全的最新技术和众所周知的规范框架,另一方面检查了与操作机器人相关的监管和法律责任问题。我们根据可交付成果的要求结构组织了报告,并考虑到欧盟和国际层面认可的不同机器人技术。该可交付成果与其他可交付成果密切相关,这些可交付成果从不同的角度描述了技术和规范框架的当前状态。本审查报告旨在作为所有项目合作伙伴使用的指导性文件。目前,欧洲没有统一的框架来规范机器人技术。不同类型的机器人,取决于他们在哪里操作-在哪个成员国和在空中,在陆地上,还是在水中-可能受到国际,欧盟,成员国层面的各种现行法律或法规的约束。这些规定包括机器人技术本身的法律标准和行业指导方针,以及在这些新技术能够合法和安全地部署之前必须满足的开发商、制造商、供应商和运营商。特定类型的机器人受到不同的监管制度的约束,根据机器人的类型,适用的法规可能在整个欧洲协调一致,也可能在每个成员国有所不同。目前欧盟和成员国层面的责任制度规定,与机器人相关的人类对机器人造成的财产损害或人身伤害负有民事责任。根据具体情况,适当的法律制度可以是基于错误的、严格责任的或产品责任的。鉴于目前的技术状况,现有的法律足以解决责任问题,但随着科学的进一步进步,越来越复杂的机器人可能会带来如何适当分配责任的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Fundamentals, Geopolitical Risk and Expectations Factors on Crude Oil Prices Exergoeconomic Assessment of the Ejector-Based Battery Thermal Management System for Electric and Hybrid-Electric Vehicles A High-Performance Flexible Supercapacitor Using Dual Alkaline Redox Electrolytes How to talk about an out-group: Effects on in-group trust and out-group generosity External Debt Burden and Infrastructural Development Nexus in Nigeria: An ARDL Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1