AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON TURKISH EFL LEARNERS’ WRITING TASKS

Berfu Duygun, P. Karabacak
{"title":"AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON TURKISH EFL LEARNERS’ WRITING TASKS","authors":"Berfu Duygun, P. Karabacak","doi":"10.47216/literacytrek.1117158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This descriptive qualitative study aimed to investigate the types and sources of errors committed by Turkish students learning English as a foreign language (EFL) in their foreign language (L2) writings as well as find out whether there is a difference in terms of the number, classification, and sources of errors between students at two different proficiency levels. To this end, the study was carried out at the School of Foreign Languages at a non-profit foundation university in Turkey ​​in the 2020-2021 academic year. The students participating in the study (N= 32), who were selected using the convenient sampling method and participated in the study voluntarily, were Turkish preparatory class students having two different English proficiency levels, namely A1 level (n= 16) and A2 level (n= 16). Data for the study came from three different narrative paragraphs (each ranging in a 100 - 200 word band) written by the students, and a total of 96 paragraphs were collected for the study. The analysis revealed that the most frequent type of error was grammatical errors overall, a large part of which was the inappropriate use of verb forms. Moreover, findings concerning the potential differences between two proficiency levels showed that A1 level learners committed more errors than A2 level learners in all types except the semantic errors. Based on these findings, a number of implications for L2 writing teachers are discussed.","PeriodicalId":390917,"journal":{"name":"The Literacy Trek","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Literacy Trek","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47216/literacytrek.1117158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This descriptive qualitative study aimed to investigate the types and sources of errors committed by Turkish students learning English as a foreign language (EFL) in their foreign language (L2) writings as well as find out whether there is a difference in terms of the number, classification, and sources of errors between students at two different proficiency levels. To this end, the study was carried out at the School of Foreign Languages at a non-profit foundation university in Turkey ​​in the 2020-2021 academic year. The students participating in the study (N= 32), who were selected using the convenient sampling method and participated in the study voluntarily, were Turkish preparatory class students having two different English proficiency levels, namely A1 level (n= 16) and A2 level (n= 16). Data for the study came from three different narrative paragraphs (each ranging in a 100 - 200 word band) written by the students, and a total of 96 paragraphs were collected for the study. The analysis revealed that the most frequent type of error was grammatical errors overall, a large part of which was the inappropriate use of verb forms. Moreover, findings concerning the potential differences between two proficiency levels showed that A1 level learners committed more errors than A2 level learners in all types except the semantic errors. Based on these findings, a number of implications for L2 writing teachers are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其英语学习者写作任务的错误分析
本描述性定性研究旨在调查土耳其作为外语学习英语(EFL)的学生在其外语(L2)写作中所犯错误的类型和来源,并找出两种不同熟练程度的学生在错误的数量、分类和来源方面是否存在差异。为此,该研究于2020-2021学年在土耳其一所非营利性基础大学的外语学院进行。参与研究的学生(N= 32)采用方便抽样法自愿参与研究,他们是英语水平不同的土耳其预科班学生,分别为A1水平(N= 16)和A2水平(N= 16)。研究数据来自学生写的三个不同的叙述段落(每个段落在100 - 200字的范围内),总共收集了96段用于研究。分析显示,最常见的错误类型是语法错误,其中很大一部分是动词形式的不当使用。此外,关于两种熟练程度之间潜在差异的研究结果表明,除了语义错误外,A1水平学习者在所有类型的错误中都比A2水平学习者犯更多的错误。基于这些发现,本文讨论了对二语写作教师的一些启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Interactive Conversation with a Chatbot: Does ChatGPT Know Standard Phraseology in Aviation English? Investigating Attitudes toward Plagiarism among Post-Graduate ELT Students Online Testing and Assessment in the English as a Foreign Language Context: Teachers' Perspectives An autoethnographic study: Self-growth approach for teacher educators in training tech-effective teachers Students’ Metaphoric Perceptions Regarding Online Education Process and Praxis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1