DATING THE BRONZE AGE OF SOUTHEAST ASIA. WHY DOES IT MATTER?

C. Higham, T. Higham, K. Douka
{"title":"DATING THE BRONZE AGE OF SOUTHEAST ASIA. WHY DOES IT MATTER?","authors":"C. Higham, T. Higham, K. Douka","doi":"10.7152/jipa.v43i0.15411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have dated human bone, freshwater shell, charcoal and rice grains from key sites in mainland Southeast Asia in order to establish the chronological scaffolding for later prehistory (ca 2500 BC-AD 500). In a recent report on the metal remains from the site of Ban Chiang, however, this chronology has been challenged. Here, we respond to these claims and show that they are unfounded and misleading. We maintain the integrity of the Bayesian-modelled radiocarbon results that identify the arrival of the first rice and millet farmers in mainland Southeast Asia towards the end of the 3rd millennium BC, with the first evidence for the casting of bronze by about 1100 BC. Social change that followed the establishment of metallurgy was rapid and profound. ","PeriodicalId":272474,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indo-Pacific Archaeology","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indo-Pacific Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7152/jipa.v43i0.15411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

We have dated human bone, freshwater shell, charcoal and rice grains from key sites in mainland Southeast Asia in order to establish the chronological scaffolding for later prehistory (ca 2500 BC-AD 500). In a recent report on the metal remains from the site of Ban Chiang, however, this chronology has been challenged. Here, we respond to these claims and show that they are unfounded and misleading. We maintain the integrity of the Bayesian-modelled radiocarbon results that identify the arrival of the first rice and millet farmers in mainland Southeast Asia towards the end of the 3rd millennium BC, with the first evidence for the casting of bronze by about 1100 BC. Social change that followed the establishment of metallurgy was rapid and profound. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东南亚青铜器时代的年代。为什么这很重要?
我们对来自东南亚大陆主要遗址的人骨、淡水贝壳、木炭和米粒进行了年代测定,以确定史前晚期(约公元前2500年-公元500年)的时间框架。然而,在最近一份关于班蒋遗址金属遗迹的报告中,这种年代顺序受到了挑战。在这里,我们对这些说法作出回应,并表明它们是毫无根据和误导的。我们保持了贝叶斯模型放射性碳结果的完整性,这些结果确定了第一批水稻和谷子农民在公元前3千年末到达东南亚大陆,并提供了公元前1100年左右铸造青铜的第一个证据。随着冶金术的建立,社会发生了迅速而深刻的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cultural Resource Management of the Dying Ivory Craftsmanship as Reflected in the Wood Carving of Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala DATING THE BRONZE AGE OF SOUTHEAST ASIA. WHY DOES IT MATTER? INDUSTRIES OF ANGKOR PROJECT: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF IRON PRODUCTION AT BOENG KROAM, PREAH KHAN OF KOMPONG SVAY MEGALITHIC JAR SITES OF LAOS: A COMPREHENSIVE OVERVIEW AND NEW DISCOVERIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1