Performance of Members of Parliament: An Exploratory Analysis of the 15th and 16th Lok Sabha

M. Kapoor, S. Ravi
{"title":"Performance of Members of Parliament: An Exploratory Analysis of the 15th and 16th Lok Sabha","authors":"M. Kapoor, S. Ravi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3904715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Questioning the government by the elected representatives on the floor of the house, irrespective of political ideology, is a fundamental feature of parliamentary democracy. In this paper, using data from the 15th and 16th Lok Sabha (LS), we study the performance of Member of Parliaments (MPs) from two major political alliances: United Progressive Alliance (UPA) and the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), in terms of attendance and the number of questions asked on the floor of the house. With respect to attendance, we find that in the 15th LS, when NDA was in the opposition and the UPA formed the government, then MPs from NDA and the UPA had similar attendance (76.6% for UPA vs. 75.2% for NDA). However, in the 16th Lok Sabha when NDA formed the government and the UPA was in the opposition, then MPs from the UPA were significantly less likely to attend the parliament as compared to MPs from the NDA (75% for UPA vs. 85% for NDA). In terms of questions asked: the NDA MPs in the opposition in 15th LS asked on an average 326 questions, which was significantly higher than the average number of questions asked by MPs of the ruling alliance, the UPA, at 240. However, in the subsequent 16th LS when NDA was the ruling alliance and the UPA was in the opposition, then MPs from NDA asked on an average 266 questions, while MPs from the UPA asked on an average 293 questions, and this difference was insignificant at the 95% confidence interval. Similar analysis has been performed at the level of the political parties","PeriodicalId":170831,"journal":{"name":"Public Choice: Analysis of Collective Decision-Making eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Choice: Analysis of Collective Decision-Making eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3904715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Questioning the government by the elected representatives on the floor of the house, irrespective of political ideology, is a fundamental feature of parliamentary democracy. In this paper, using data from the 15th and 16th Lok Sabha (LS), we study the performance of Member of Parliaments (MPs) from two major political alliances: United Progressive Alliance (UPA) and the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), in terms of attendance and the number of questions asked on the floor of the house. With respect to attendance, we find that in the 15th LS, when NDA was in the opposition and the UPA formed the government, then MPs from NDA and the UPA had similar attendance (76.6% for UPA vs. 75.2% for NDA). However, in the 16th Lok Sabha when NDA formed the government and the UPA was in the opposition, then MPs from the UPA were significantly less likely to attend the parliament as compared to MPs from the NDA (75% for UPA vs. 85% for NDA). In terms of questions asked: the NDA MPs in the opposition in 15th LS asked on an average 326 questions, which was significantly higher than the average number of questions asked by MPs of the ruling alliance, the UPA, at 240. However, in the subsequent 16th LS when NDA was the ruling alliance and the UPA was in the opposition, then MPs from NDA asked on an average 266 questions, while MPs from the UPA asked on an average 293 questions, and this difference was insignificant at the 95% confidence interval. Similar analysis has been performed at the level of the political parties
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国会议员的表现:第十五届和第十六届人民院的探索性分析
议会民主的一个基本特征是,无论政治意识形态如何,在议会下院由当选的代表对政府提出质疑。在本文中,我们使用第15届和第16届人民院(LS)的数据,研究了来自两个主要政治联盟:团结进步联盟(UPA)和全国民主联盟(NDA)的国会议员(MPs)在出席率和在众议院提出的问题数量方面的表现。在出席率方面,我们发现,在第15届大选中,当全国民主联盟(NDA)是反对党,而团结进步联盟(UPA)组建政府时,全国民主联盟(NDA)和团结进步联盟(UPA)的议员出席率相似(UPA为76.6%,全国民主联盟为75.2%)。然而,在第16届人民院,当全国民主联盟组建政府,而团结进步联盟是反对党时,与全国民主联盟的议员相比,来自团结进步联盟的议员参加议会的可能性要小得多(75%的团结进步联盟和85%的全国民主联盟)。在提问方面:第15届国会中,反对党NDA议员平均提问326个问题,明显高于执政联盟UPA议员的平均提问数(240个)。然而,在随后的第16届国会中,当NDA是执政联盟,UPA是反对党时,NDA的国会议员平均提出了266个问题,而UPA的国会议员平均提出了293个问题,这一差异在95%置信区间内不显著。在政党层面也进行了类似的分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Violent Conflict and the Strength of Civil Society A Model of Embedded Autonomy and Asymmetric Information Endogenous Networks and Legislative Activity Judicial Independence: Why Does De Facto Diverge from De Jure? Does Ethnic Diversity Always Undermine Pro-Social Behavior? Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1