Light Footprints to a Long War

Christopher D. Kolenda
{"title":"Light Footprints to a Long War","authors":"Christopher D. Kolenda","doi":"10.5810/kentucky/9780813152769.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses U.S. planning and assumptions before the invasion of Afghanistan. The Bush administration, with President Bush’s dislike of nation-building, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld’s preference for light, technological solutions, and the idea that Afghanistan was only one of many fronts of the Global War on Terrorism, opted for a limited military footprint and aimed to exit as quickly as possible. A contradiction ensued between a decisive victory outcome and the minimalist ways and means devoted to it.","PeriodicalId":235305,"journal":{"name":"Zero-Sum Victory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zero-Sum Victory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5810/kentucky/9780813152769.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter discusses U.S. planning and assumptions before the invasion of Afghanistan. The Bush administration, with President Bush’s dislike of nation-building, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld’s preference for light, technological solutions, and the idea that Afghanistan was only one of many fronts of the Global War on Terrorism, opted for a limited military footprint and aimed to exit as quickly as possible. A contradiction ensued between a decisive victory outcome and the minimalist ways and means devoted to it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脚印轻,战争长
本章讨论美国在入侵阿富汗之前的计划和设想。布什政府,由于布什总统不喜欢国家建设,国防部长拉姆斯菲尔德偏爱简单的技术解决方案,并且认为阿富汗只是全球反恐战争的众多前线之一,选择了有限的军事足迹,并以尽快撤军为目标。在决定性的胜利结果和致力于它的极简主义方法和手段之间产生了矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Complicated Approach to a Complex Situation From Decisive Victory to Transition Failing to Keep Pace with the Insurgency, 2007–2009 Further Defining War Termination Reconciliation versus Transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1