Progress in the First Five Years: An Evaluation of Achieving the Dream Colleges in Washington State

Davis Jenkins, John Wachen, M. Kerrigan, Alexander K. Mayer
{"title":"Progress in the First Five Years: An Evaluation of Achieving the Dream Colleges in Washington State","authors":"Davis Jenkins, John Wachen, M. Kerrigan, Alexander K. Mayer","doi":"10.7916/D8S75DDT","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"iii Overview In 2004, Lumina Foundation for Education launched an innovative national reform initiative, Achieving the Dream (ATD), with the purpose of increasing the persistence and completion rates of community college students, especially low-income students and students of color, through evidence-based institutional change. Originally consisting of 26 partner colleges in five states, today more than 150 colleges in 30 states and the District of Columbia participate in ATD, which in 2010 became a national nonprofit organization. This report examines six community and technical colleges in Washington State that joined the initiative in 2006 (\" Round 3 \") and were provided with grant funding from College Spark Washington and the services of a leadership coach and data coach to facilitate their ATD efforts. The report (1) describes the progress each college made in implementing ATD's \" culture of evidence \" principles for institutional improvement; (2) examines strategies implemented by the colleges to improve student outcomes, comparing them to interventions developed by the 26 \" Round 1 \" colleges that joined ATD in 2004; and (3) charts trends in student outcomes in the period before and after the Washington colleges joined the initiative. Key findings for the six Washington ATD colleges are: • Progress toward building a culture of evidence. All but one of the colleges made at least some progress. Two colleges made substantial progress, moving from a low level of implementation to a high level over the five years of their ATD involvement. Specifically, they strengthened student success goals and strategies, increased their institutional research capacities, created institutional effectiveness committees, and strengthened their program review processes. • Development of student success strategies. Several of the colleges — those further along in implementing the ATD culture of evidence principles — made significant systemic changes to programs and services. Compared with the Round 1 ATD colleges, the Washington colleges were more likely to have implemented changes in instruction as opposed to student support services and were more successful in operating improvement strategies at scale. • Student outcome trends after ATD implementation. The average student outcomes across the six colleges appear largely unchanged, as do the racial and economic achievement gaps. The colleges that succeeded in implementing improvement strategies at scale did so only later in the iv period under study. It may be too early to see their impact. On the other hand, most of the reforms implemented by the Washington colleges …","PeriodicalId":218750,"journal":{"name":"Community College Research Center, Columbia University","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community College Research Center, Columbia University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8S75DDT","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

iii Overview In 2004, Lumina Foundation for Education launched an innovative national reform initiative, Achieving the Dream (ATD), with the purpose of increasing the persistence and completion rates of community college students, especially low-income students and students of color, through evidence-based institutional change. Originally consisting of 26 partner colleges in five states, today more than 150 colleges in 30 states and the District of Columbia participate in ATD, which in 2010 became a national nonprofit organization. This report examines six community and technical colleges in Washington State that joined the initiative in 2006 (" Round 3 ") and were provided with grant funding from College Spark Washington and the services of a leadership coach and data coach to facilitate their ATD efforts. The report (1) describes the progress each college made in implementing ATD's " culture of evidence " principles for institutional improvement; (2) examines strategies implemented by the colleges to improve student outcomes, comparing them to interventions developed by the 26 " Round 1 " colleges that joined ATD in 2004; and (3) charts trends in student outcomes in the period before and after the Washington colleges joined the initiative. Key findings for the six Washington ATD colleges are: • Progress toward building a culture of evidence. All but one of the colleges made at least some progress. Two colleges made substantial progress, moving from a low level of implementation to a high level over the five years of their ATD involvement. Specifically, they strengthened student success goals and strategies, increased their institutional research capacities, created institutional effectiveness committees, and strengthened their program review processes. • Development of student success strategies. Several of the colleges — those further along in implementing the ATD culture of evidence principles — made significant systemic changes to programs and services. Compared with the Round 1 ATD colleges, the Washington colleges were more likely to have implemented changes in instruction as opposed to student support services and were more successful in operating improvement strategies at scale. • Student outcome trends after ATD implementation. The average student outcomes across the six colleges appear largely unchanged, as do the racial and economic achievement gaps. The colleges that succeeded in implementing improvement strategies at scale did so only later in the iv period under study. It may be too early to see their impact. On the other hand, most of the reforms implemented by the Washington colleges …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前五年的进展:对华盛顿州梦想大学的评估
2004年,卢米纳教育基金会发起了一项创新的国家改革倡议,“实现梦想”(ATD),目的是通过基于证据的制度变革,提高社区大学生,特别是低收入学生和有色人种学生的坚持和完成率。ATD最初由五个州的26所合作大学组成,如今,30个州和哥伦比亚特区的150多所大学加入了该组织,并于2010年成为一个全国性的非营利组织。本报告考察了2006年加入该计划的华盛顿州六所社区和技术学院(“第三轮”),这些学院获得了华盛顿火花学院的资助,并获得了领导力教练和数据教练的服务,以促进他们的ATD工作。报告(1)描述了每所学院在实施ATD的“证据文化”原则以改善制度方面取得的进展;(2)研究各院校为改善学生成绩所采取的策略,并将这些策略与2004年加入创新发展计划的26所“第一轮”院校所采取的干预措施进行比较;(3)绘制了华盛顿大学加入该计划前后学生成绩的趋势图。六所华盛顿ATD学院的主要发现是:•在建立证据文化方面取得进展。除了一所学院以外,其他所有学院至少都取得了一些进展。两所学院在参与ATD的五年中取得了实质性的进展,从低水平的实施到高水平的实施。具体来说,他们加强了学生成功的目标和策略,提高了机构的研究能力,建立了机构效率委员会,并加强了项目审查过程。•制定学生成功策略。在实施ATD证据原则文化方面走得更远的几所大学对项目和服务进行了重大的系统性改革。与第一轮ATD学院相比,华盛顿大学更有可能在教学方面实施变革,而不是在学生支持服务方面,并且在大规模运营改进策略方面更成功。•实施ATD后的学生成绩趋势。这六所大学的学生平均成绩似乎基本没有变化,种族和经济成就差距也没有变化。成功实施大规模改进策略的大学只是在研究的第四阶段后期才这样做。现在要看到它们的影响可能还为时过早。另一方面,华盛顿大学实施的大部分改革……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Redefining Full-Time in College: Evidence on 15-Credit Strategies A Growing Culture of Evidence? Findings From a Survey on Data Use at Achieving the Dream Colleges in Washington State Characterizing the Effectiveness of Developmental Education: A Response to Recent Criticism Acceleration Through a Holistic Support Model: An Implementation and Outcomes Analysis of FastStart@CCD Adaptability to Online Learning: Differences across Types of Students and Academic Subject Areas. CCRC Working Paper No. 54.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1