The Effect of Shareholder Turnout on Voting Rights and Separation

Øyvind Bøhren, S. Christophersen, Simen Lerfaldet
{"title":"The Effect of Shareholder Turnout on Voting Rights and Separation","authors":"Øyvind Bøhren, S. Christophersen, Simen Lerfaldet","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3555404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We find that shareholder turnout at the general meeting of Norwegian public firms varies between 11% and 95%, being 59% on average. This turnout behavior implies that majority control requires less than one third of the average firm’s shares, and that attending shareholders vote for 1.7 times the shares they own. Turnout is higher when the largest shareholder is foreign, the firm is small, the debt is low, and option compensation is on the agenda. This evidence suggests that shareholders consider the general meeting a more important monitoring device the more serious the potential conflicts of interest in the firm.","PeriodicalId":204440,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Finance eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance & Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3555404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We find that shareholder turnout at the general meeting of Norwegian public firms varies between 11% and 95%, being 59% on average. This turnout behavior implies that majority control requires less than one third of the average firm’s shares, and that attending shareholders vote for 1.7 times the shares they own. Turnout is higher when the largest shareholder is foreign, the firm is small, the debt is low, and option compensation is on the agenda. This evidence suggests that shareholders consider the general meeting a more important monitoring device the more serious the potential conflicts of interest in the firm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股东投票率对表决权和离职的影响
我们发现挪威上市公司股东大会的投票率在11%到95%之间,平均为59%。这种投票行为意味着多数控制需要少于公司平均股份的三分之一,并且出席的股东的投票权是他们所拥有股份的1.7倍。当最大股东是外国人、公司规模小、债务低、期权补偿被提上日程时,投票率会更高。这一证据表明,股东认为股东大会是一种更重要的监督手段,公司潜在的利益冲突越严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Do Outside CEOs Really Do? Evidence from Plant-Level Data Energy Finance The Pricing of Acquired Intangibles Inclusive Managers How Do Independent Directors View Generalist vs. Specialist CEOs? Evidence from an Exogenous Regulatory Shock
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1