Polarization and Media Usage

J. Benedictis-Kessner, M. Baum, Adam J. Berinsky
{"title":"Polarization and Media Usage","authors":"J. Benedictis-Kessner, M. Baum, Adam J. Berinsky","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190860806.013.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the literature concerning media choice and partisan polarization. The past few decades have seen enormous growth in the number of television and internet news sources, giving consumers dramatically increased choices. Previous research has suggested two distinct links between media choice and partisan polarization: partisan media as a reflection of polarization, as partisans self-select into media that conforms with their preexisting views, or as a cause of polarization, when outlets present one-sided stories that persuade people to adopt more extreme views. This chapter discusses how the literature in these two research traditions has diverged, as well as more recent research attempting to bridge this divide. Using novel methods, these studies have drawn together both self-selection and causal research designs to provide a more complete picture of media choice effects, and expanded the literature to more recent mediums, including the internet and social media.","PeriodicalId":184516,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190860806.013.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines the literature concerning media choice and partisan polarization. The past few decades have seen enormous growth in the number of television and internet news sources, giving consumers dramatically increased choices. Previous research has suggested two distinct links between media choice and partisan polarization: partisan media as a reflection of polarization, as partisans self-select into media that conforms with their preexisting views, or as a cause of polarization, when outlets present one-sided stories that persuade people to adopt more extreme views. This chapter discusses how the literature in these two research traditions has diverged, as well as more recent research attempting to bridge this divide. Using novel methods, these studies have drawn together both self-selection and causal research designs to provide a more complete picture of media choice effects, and expanded the literature to more recent mediums, including the internet and social media.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两极分化与媒体使用
本章检视有关媒体选择与党派两极化的文献。在过去的几十年里,电视和互联网新闻来源的数量有了巨大的增长,这给了消费者极大地增加了选择。先前的研究表明,媒体选择与党派分化之间存在两种截然不同的联系:党派媒体是两极分化的反映,因为党派人士自己选择与他们先前存在的观点一致的媒体,或者是两极分化的原因,当媒体呈现片面的故事时,说服人们采取更极端的观点。本章讨论了这两种研究传统的文献是如何分化的,以及最近试图弥合这一鸿沟的研究。这些研究采用新颖的方法,将自我选择和因果研究设计结合在一起,以提供媒体选择效应的更完整图景,并将文献扩展到更近期的媒体,包括互联网和社交媒体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How and Why the Populist Radical Right Persuades Citizens Persuasion in Interpersonal Networks Citizens, Elites, and Social Media Methodological Challenges and Opportunities in the Study of Persuasion and Mobilization Electoral Persuasion in the New Democracies Challenges and Opportunities Online Versus Offline Strategies in Comparative Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1