[Urine checks as a supportive measure with drug abuse patients to supplement current therapy models].

Beitrage zur gerichtlichen Medizin Pub Date : 1991-01-01
G Friedrich, D Leber, M Weigend
{"title":"[Urine checks as a supportive measure with drug abuse patients to supplement current therapy models].","authors":"G Friedrich,&nbsp;D Leber,&nbsp;M Weigend","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urine samples of 120 heroin-addicted probands who had to take part in urinanalysis tests were analysed during a 26 months' period. Up to 7 substances (morphine/diamorphie, codeine, cocain, LSD, cannabinoides, barbiturates and amphetamines) were tested. The results were compared to the results of a group of 177 cannabies-smokers. The purpose of this study was to find out in how far urinanalysis tests can change drug-consuming behaviour. More than 80% of the cannabis-smokers showed evidently a decrease of THC-positive urine samples at the end of the investigation period. Only about 13% had positive samples during the whole period. 12 out of 120 heroin-addicted probands (= 10%) had morphine-positive urine samples at the beginning of investigations. For 104 out of 1423 tested samples (46 probands) an unmistakable distinction between morphine/diamorphine- or codeine-intake was not possible because the concentrations found were too low. About 20% of the samples indicated a shift to a substitutional used drug like codeine. Further more a slightly significant increase of cannabis-intake was to be observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":75580,"journal":{"name":"Beitrage zur gerichtlichen Medizin","volume":"49 ","pages":"325-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beitrage zur gerichtlichen Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urine samples of 120 heroin-addicted probands who had to take part in urinanalysis tests were analysed during a 26 months' period. Up to 7 substances (morphine/diamorphie, codeine, cocain, LSD, cannabinoides, barbiturates and amphetamines) were tested. The results were compared to the results of a group of 177 cannabies-smokers. The purpose of this study was to find out in how far urinanalysis tests can change drug-consuming behaviour. More than 80% of the cannabis-smokers showed evidently a decrease of THC-positive urine samples at the end of the investigation period. Only about 13% had positive samples during the whole period. 12 out of 120 heroin-addicted probands (= 10%) had morphine-positive urine samples at the beginning of investigations. For 104 out of 1423 tested samples (46 probands) an unmistakable distinction between morphine/diamorphine- or codeine-intake was not possible because the concentrations found were too low. About 20% of the samples indicated a shift to a substitutional used drug like codeine. Further more a slightly significant increase of cannabis-intake was to be observed.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[尿液检查作为药物滥用患者的辅助措施,以补充现有治疗模式]。
在26个月的时间里,对120名海洛因成瘾先证者的尿液样本进行了分析。测试了多达7种物质(吗啡/二吗啡、可待因、可卡因、LSD、大麻素、巴比妥酸盐和安非他明)。研究结果与177名大麻吸食者的结果进行了比较。这项研究的目的是找出尿液分析测试能在多大程度上改变吸毒行为。在调查期结束时,超过80%的大麻吸烟者的四氢大麻酚阳性尿样明显减少。在整个期间,只有约13%的样本呈阳性。120名海洛因成瘾先证者中有12名(10%)在调查开始时尿样呈吗啡阳性。在1423个测试样本中的104个(46个先证者)中,由于发现的浓度太低,无法明确区分吗啡/diamorphine或可待因的摄入量。大约20%的样本表明,他们转而使用可待因等替代药物。此外,还观察到大麻摄入量略有显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Aging processes in the brain]. [RFLP analysis of single hairs]. [Population genetic Hae III/RFLP and HLA-DQ-alpha data of a Caucasian population sample in Switzerland]. [Conversion of forensic paternity determination to DNA analysis]. [Effects of nonoxinol 9 on RFLP typing of postcoital vaginal smears].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1