The Brics as a Coalition: Analysing the Cooperation of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa in the International Monetary Fund and the G-20

A. Castro
{"title":"The Brics as a Coalition: Analysing the Cooperation of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa in the International Monetary Fund and the G-20","authors":"A. Castro","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2304399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of the BRICS is evident to the general public yet little academic literature has been written regarding its collective role in the international scenario Rather, this coalition is widely considered to be solely a descriptive acronym of the emerging powers. This dissertation studies the definition and role of the BRICS as a coalition that cooperates on the international stage. In order to do that it uses a diverse set of analysis. These tools of analysis conclude, both independently and collectively, that the BRICS act as a de facto coalition in two different international settings, in the G-20 and in the reforms of the International Monetary Fund.This paper defines the BRICS and their place in the current academic discussion of global politics. It uses three different types of analysis to assess whether the BRICS are in fact a coalition. The first approach is theoretical that utilises a framework often applied to analyse the blocs within the World Trade Organisation. The second approach is a qualitative analysis regarding how the creation of the G-20 and how its decisions were affected by the BRICS coordination. The final approach is a case study that examines the gains achieved by the BRICS during the reform of the IMF.","PeriodicalId":341166,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Trade Relationships (Topic)","volume":"46 41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Trade Relationships (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2304399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise of the BRICS is evident to the general public yet little academic literature has been written regarding its collective role in the international scenario Rather, this coalition is widely considered to be solely a descriptive acronym of the emerging powers. This dissertation studies the definition and role of the BRICS as a coalition that cooperates on the international stage. In order to do that it uses a diverse set of analysis. These tools of analysis conclude, both independently and collectively, that the BRICS act as a de facto coalition in two different international settings, in the G-20 and in the reforms of the International Monetary Fund.This paper defines the BRICS and their place in the current academic discussion of global politics. It uses three different types of analysis to assess whether the BRICS are in fact a coalition. The first approach is theoretical that utilises a framework often applied to analyse the blocs within the World Trade Organisation. The second approach is a qualitative analysis regarding how the creation of the G-20 and how its decisions were affected by the BRICS coordination. The final approach is a case study that examines the gains achieved by the BRICS during the reform of the IMF.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金砖四国联盟:分析巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非在国际货币基金组织和20国集团中的合作
金砖国家的崛起对公众来说是显而易见的,但关于其在国际形势中的集体作用的学术文献却很少。相反,这个联盟被广泛认为只是新兴大国的描述性缩写。本文研究了金砖国家作为一个在国际舞台上合作的联盟的定义和作用。为了做到这一点,它使用了一系列不同的分析。这些分析工具各自或共同得出的结论是,金砖国家在g20和国际货币基金组织(imf)改革这两个不同的国际环境中实际上是一个联盟。本文定义了金砖国家及其在当前全球政治学术讨论中的地位。它使用三种不同类型的分析来评估金砖国家是否实际上是一个联盟。第一种方法是理论性的,它利用了一个经常用于分析世界贸易组织(wto)内部集团的框架。第二种方法是定性分析20国集团的创建及其决策如何受到金砖国家协调的影响。最后是一个案例研究,考察金砖国家在国际货币基金组织改革中取得的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Do International Trade Shocks Propagate Through Domestic Supply Chains? Connecting World Input-Output Tables and Firm-Level Supply Chain Data The Complementarity Between Trust and Contract Enforcement Level Playing Fields and Rebalancing: A Comment Hong Kong’s Intermediary Role on Funding the BRI: How Does it Fare Against Singapore? Diminishing American Power: The US - China Trade War, Sanctions, and Coronavirus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1