Investigations on Multi-Stage Tests and Transient Endurance Limit Behavior Under Low-, High- and Very High Cycle Fatigue Loads

T. Schopf, S. Weihe, J. Rudolph
{"title":"Investigations on Multi-Stage Tests and Transient Endurance Limit Behavior Under Low-, High- and Very High Cycle Fatigue Loads","authors":"T. Schopf, S. Weihe, J. Rudolph","doi":"10.1115/pvp2022-84718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The fatigue analyses included in nuclear rules of KTA [1]–[2] and ASME [3] are based on defined loads (specified or measured loads and frequencies). It is assumed that highly cyclic loadings or resonance vibrations are avoided by appropriate design. Often these loads are recorded by measurements during commissioning or during operation. In particular, in pressure vessel and reactor internals such vibrational excitations cannot be excluded, so that fatigue loadings in the HCF regime and even in the VHCF regime can occur. Since these kinds of loading situations also appear in combination with fatigue loadings in the LCF regime, load collectives are to be considered, as they are not explicitly taken into account in the current analysis of the nuclear regulations. Furthermore, no generally validated method, especially a consolidated damage accumulation model is available. Furthermore, design fatigue curves for austenitic steels in the applicable international design codes were extended by extrapolation from originally 106 up to 1011 load cycles [1]–[3]. However, the existing database for load cycles equal to or above 107 is still insufficient. Therefore, international efforts are currently ongoing in order to expand the database through international co-operations and compile a safe high cycle fatigue (HCF) database [4]. This is particularly important in combination with the influence of the cooling medium and its consideration according to established international standards as the database of the Argonne National Laboratory ANL [5] for fatigue behavior under medium conditions. For the range from HCF to VHCF and for their combination with LCF loads (collective effect) and the currently discussed limit values above which the cooling medium has an effective influence on the fatigue strength are not sufficiently consolidated. These aspects gain in importance particularly in the long-term operation context. A recently finished cooperative research project aims at contributing to closing these mentioned gaps by generation of a data and assessment basis for the fatigue behavior of welded austenitic stainless steels at high numbers of load cycles [6].\n The following topics will be discussed in detail in the paper:\n • Fatigue behavior at variable amplitude loading (combination of LCF / HCF and LCF / VHCF)\n • Development of a fatigue assessment methodology under consideration of the transient endurance limit and damage accumulation effects including assessment and adaptation of appropriate fatigue damage parameters","PeriodicalId":434925,"journal":{"name":"Volume 4A: Materials and Fabrication","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 4A: Materials and Fabrication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-84718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fatigue analyses included in nuclear rules of KTA [1]–[2] and ASME [3] are based on defined loads (specified or measured loads and frequencies). It is assumed that highly cyclic loadings or resonance vibrations are avoided by appropriate design. Often these loads are recorded by measurements during commissioning or during operation. In particular, in pressure vessel and reactor internals such vibrational excitations cannot be excluded, so that fatigue loadings in the HCF regime and even in the VHCF regime can occur. Since these kinds of loading situations also appear in combination with fatigue loadings in the LCF regime, load collectives are to be considered, as they are not explicitly taken into account in the current analysis of the nuclear regulations. Furthermore, no generally validated method, especially a consolidated damage accumulation model is available. Furthermore, design fatigue curves for austenitic steels in the applicable international design codes were extended by extrapolation from originally 106 up to 1011 load cycles [1]–[3]. However, the existing database for load cycles equal to or above 107 is still insufficient. Therefore, international efforts are currently ongoing in order to expand the database through international co-operations and compile a safe high cycle fatigue (HCF) database [4]. This is particularly important in combination with the influence of the cooling medium and its consideration according to established international standards as the database of the Argonne National Laboratory ANL [5] for fatigue behavior under medium conditions. For the range from HCF to VHCF and for their combination with LCF loads (collective effect) and the currently discussed limit values above which the cooling medium has an effective influence on the fatigue strength are not sufficiently consolidated. These aspects gain in importance particularly in the long-term operation context. A recently finished cooperative research project aims at contributing to closing these mentioned gaps by generation of a data and assessment basis for the fatigue behavior of welded austenitic stainless steels at high numbers of load cycles [6]. The following topics will be discussed in detail in the paper: • Fatigue behavior at variable amplitude loading (combination of LCF / HCF and LCF / VHCF) • Development of a fatigue assessment methodology under consideration of the transient endurance limit and damage accumulation effects including assessment and adaptation of appropriate fatigue damage parameters
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低、高、甚高周疲劳载荷下的多段试验及瞬态耐久性极限行为研究
KTA[1] -[2]和ASME[3]核规则中包含的疲劳分析基于定义载荷(指定或测量的载荷和频率)。假设通过适当的设计可以避免高循环载荷或共振振动。通常这些负载是在调试或运行期间通过测量记录下来的。特别是在压力容器和反应堆内部,不能排除这种振动激励,因此在HCF状态甚至在VHCF状态下都可能发生疲劳载荷。由于这些类型的载荷情况也与LCF制度中的疲劳载荷结合出现,因此需要考虑载荷集体,因为它们在当前的核法规分析中没有明确考虑。而且,目前还没有一个普遍有效的方法,特别是一个统一的损伤累积模型。此外,在适用的国际设计规范中,奥氏体钢的设计疲劳曲线通过外推从原来的106个荷载循环扩展到1011个荷载循环[1]-[3]。但是,负载周期等于或大于107的现有数据库仍然不够。因此,目前国际上正在努力通过国际合作扩大数据库,并编制安全高循环疲劳(HCF)数据库[4]。考虑到冷却介质的影响,并根据既定的国际标准(如Argonne National Laboratory ANL[5]的介质条件下疲劳行为数据库)来考虑,这一点尤为重要。对于从HCF到VHCF的范围,以及它们与LCF载荷的组合(集体效应),以及目前讨论的冷却介质对疲劳强度有有效影响的限值没有得到充分的整合。这些方面在长期操作环境中尤为重要。最近完成的一项合作研究项目旨在通过生成焊接奥氏体不锈钢在高载荷循环次数下的疲劳行为的数据和评估基础来弥补上述差距[6]。本文将详细讨论以下主题:•可变振幅载荷下的疲劳行为(LCF / HCF和LCF / VHCF的组合)•考虑瞬态耐久性极限和损伤累积效应的疲劳评估方法的开发,包括评估和适应适当的疲劳损伤参数
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fracture Toughness Testing of 316L Steel Manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion Development of Life Estimation Method for Nozzle Welds in Large Scale Piping of Modified 9Cr-1Mo Steel -Part I: Experimental Study Computational Mechanics Based Validation of Crack Growth Approaches for Fracture Specimen Predictions Development of a Robust Procedure for the Evaluation of Striation Spacings in Low Cycle Fatigue Specimens Tested in a Simulated PWR Environment Further Developments in Nuclear Pressure Vessel Manufacture Using the Hot Isostatic Pressing Process and Thick-Section Electron Beam Welding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1