Lifelong Learning Motivation Scale (LLMS):Validity and Reliability Study

Ertugrul Usta
{"title":"Lifelong Learning Motivation Scale (LLMS):Validity and Reliability Study","authors":"Ertugrul Usta","doi":"10.51535/tell.1309487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to develop a scale for measuring lifelong learning skills in both young and adult individuals. A total of 275 participants, ranging in age from 14 to 55, took part in the study. The first step in creating the scale item pool involved conducting a thorough literature review. Existing scales related to the subject were examined, and based on these findings, an initial 18-item form was developed. The scale item pool was then presented to two experts who are academicians in the field of lifelong learning, as well as a scale development expert. Their input was taken into account, resulting in corrections and refinements to the scale trial form. Following this, the revised scale trial form was administered to the participants. To assess the construct validity of the scale, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted. This analysis revealed that 7 items needed to be removed from the scale. Ultimately, the scale was found to consist of five factors. The first factor included 5 items, while the remaining factors consisted of 3 items each. Next, a confirmatory factor analysis was performed to determine the relationships between the factors, the relationships between the variables and the factors, the relationships between the factors themselves, and the degree to which the factors explained the model. The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for the scale was found to be .646. Based on these results, the Lifelong Learning Motivation Scale (LLMSS) was developed to address the existing gap in the literature and provide a useful tool for future research and applications related to lifelong learning.","PeriodicalId":127236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning","volume":"223 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1309487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a scale for measuring lifelong learning skills in both young and adult individuals. A total of 275 participants, ranging in age from 14 to 55, took part in the study. The first step in creating the scale item pool involved conducting a thorough literature review. Existing scales related to the subject were examined, and based on these findings, an initial 18-item form was developed. The scale item pool was then presented to two experts who are academicians in the field of lifelong learning, as well as a scale development expert. Their input was taken into account, resulting in corrections and refinements to the scale trial form. Following this, the revised scale trial form was administered to the participants. To assess the construct validity of the scale, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted. This analysis revealed that 7 items needed to be removed from the scale. Ultimately, the scale was found to consist of five factors. The first factor included 5 items, while the remaining factors consisted of 3 items each. Next, a confirmatory factor analysis was performed to determine the relationships between the factors, the relationships between the variables and the factors, the relationships between the factors themselves, and the degree to which the factors explained the model. The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for the scale was found to be .646. Based on these results, the Lifelong Learning Motivation Scale (LLMSS) was developed to address the existing gap in the literature and provide a useful tool for future research and applications related to lifelong learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
终身学习动机量表:效度与信度研究
本研究的目的是开发一种测量青少年和成人终身学习技能的量表。共有275名参与者参加了这项研究,年龄从14岁到55岁不等。创建量表题库的第一步涉及进行全面的文献综述。审查了与该主题有关的现有量表,并根据这些发现,编制了最初的18项表格。然后将量表项目库提交给终身学习领域的两位学者和量表开发专家。考虑到他们的投入,对比例尺试算表进行了修正和改进。在此之后,对参与者进行了修订的量表试验表格。为了评估量表的构念效度,我们进行了探索性因子分析。分析显示,有7个项目需要从量表中删除。最终,量表被发现由五个因素组成。第一个因素包括5个项目,其余因素各包括3个项目。接下来,进行验证性因子分析,以确定因素之间的关系,变量与因素之间的关系,因素本身之间的关系,以及因素解释模型的程度。量表的Cronbach's α信度系数为0.646。基于这些研究结果,本研究开发了终身学习动机量表(LLMSS),以弥补现有文献的空白,并为今后终身学习相关的研究和应用提供一个有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Emergency Distance Education Based Lifelong Learning Environment Use from Student Perspective: A Phenomenological Research The Effect of The Modified Solve It! Strategy on The Mathematical Problem Solving Skills of Students with Learning Difficulties Determination of Secondary School Students' Misconceptions About the Concept of Seed with the Four-Tier Misconception Diagnostic Test Assessment of an In-Service Training Activity Transformed into an E-Learning Environment Using the Kirkpatrick Model The Mediating Role of Positive Rumination and Negative Rumination in the Relationship between Intolerance of Uncertainty and Interpersonal Problem Solving
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1