ANÁLISE DE DISCURSO APLICADA A INVESTIGAÇÃO QUALITATIVA: PERSPECTIVA METODOLÓGICA EM DEBATE

Gleny Terezinha Duro Guimarães, Marlúbia Corrêa de Paula, W. Hirai
{"title":"ANÁLISE DE DISCURSO APLICADA A INVESTIGAÇÃO QUALITATIVA: PERSPECTIVA METODOLÓGICA EM DEBATE","authors":"Gleny Terezinha Duro Guimarães, Marlúbia Corrêa de Paula, W. Hirai","doi":"10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.40-54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Michel Pecheux's discourse analysis (DA) there is no pre-established methodological procedure, which may generate uncertainty regarding its application. In this type of investigation, it is the theoretical assumptions that determine the method, leaving it to the analyst to trace his path. However, this process is not always visualized in the investigation. When reflecting on this aspect, the present work aims to problematize the explicit existence (or not) of a research methodology in DA and to identify the main methodological elements that are pointed out by discourse analysts. This is a qualitative-bibliographic investigation that uses as a method the historical materialism. The corpus was made up of six scientific articles. The analysis procedure included the realization of a mapping seeking regularities and singularities in the analyzed material. The results point to two types of methodological interpretation: one is a “generic way”, without explaining the procedure performed; and the other, giving visibility to it. The article concludes that it is possible to describe a methodological analysis procedure; not as an application of a technique, but as an investigation process in which the theoretical device is inseparable from the analytical one.","PeriodicalId":292111,"journal":{"name":"Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: avanços e desafios","volume":"07 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: avanços e desafios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.40-54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Michel Pecheux's discourse analysis (DA) there is no pre-established methodological procedure, which may generate uncertainty regarding its application. In this type of investigation, it is the theoretical assumptions that determine the method, leaving it to the analyst to trace his path. However, this process is not always visualized in the investigation. When reflecting on this aspect, the present work aims to problematize the explicit existence (or not) of a research methodology in DA and to identify the main methodological elements that are pointed out by discourse analysts. This is a qualitative-bibliographic investigation that uses as a method the historical materialism. The corpus was made up of six scientific articles. The analysis procedure included the realization of a mapping seeking regularities and singularities in the analyzed material. The results point to two types of methodological interpretation: one is a “generic way”, without explaining the procedure performed; and the other, giving visibility to it. The article concludes that it is possible to describe a methodological analysis procedure; not as an application of a technique, but as an investigation process in which the theoretical device is inseparable from the analytical one.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定性研究中的语篇分析:辩论中的方法论视角
在米歇尔·佩歇的话语分析(DA)中,没有预先建立的方法程序,这可能会对其应用产生不确定性。在这种类型的调查中,是理论假设决定了方法,留给分析人员去追踪他的路径。然而,这一过程并不总是在调查中可视化。在反思这方面时,本研究的目的是对数据分析中明确存在(或不存在)的研究方法提出质疑,并确定话语分析师指出的主要方法要素。这是一种使用历史唯物主义作为方法的定性书目调查。语料库由六篇科学论文组成。分析过程包括实现在被分析材料中寻找规律和奇异点的映射。结果指出了两种类型的方法学解释:一种是“通用方法”,不解释所执行的程序;另一个,让它可见。文章的结论是,描述一个方法学分析过程是可能的;不是作为一种技术的应用,而是作为一种研究过程,其中理论手段与分析手段是分不开的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DE ESTUDOS QUALITATIVOS EM RESÍDUOS SÓLIDOS ANÁLISE DE DISCURSO APLICADA A INVESTIGAÇÃO QUALITATIVA: PERSPECTIVA METODOLÓGICA EM DEBATE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1