Grzech sodomski Bolesława Szczodrego w świetle "Roczników" Jana Długosza

Barbara Bielaszka-Podgórny
{"title":"Grzech sodomski Bolesława Szczodrego w świetle \"Roczników\" Jana Długosza","authors":"Barbara Bielaszka-Podgórny","doi":"10.12797/sh.61.2018.02.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sodom Sin of Boleslaus II the Generous in the Light of Jan Długosz's \"Annals\" \nIn the relation entered into the third volume of his Annals, dated 1076, Jan Długosz describing the Kiev campaign of Boleslaus the Generous introduces a description of the moral metamorphosis of the Polish ruler and accompanying knights. He maintains that they were guilty of a Sodom sin, which they committed in Ruthenia. This very phenomenon received the chronicler’s decided anti-Ruthenian tone. The present article established the importance of Długosz’s accusation and explains how this very element had its role in developing negative opinions about Ruthenians in the Annals. The author also provides background information about earlier accusations against Boleslaus regarding his sexual impurity.","PeriodicalId":325295,"journal":{"name":"Studia Historyczne","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Historyczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12797/sh.61.2018.02.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sodom Sin of Boleslaus II the Generous in the Light of Jan Długosz's "Annals" In the relation entered into the third volume of his Annals, dated 1076, Jan Długosz describing the Kiev campaign of Boleslaus the Generous introduces a description of the moral metamorphosis of the Polish ruler and accompanying knights. He maintains that they were guilty of a Sodom sin, which they committed in Ruthenia. This very phenomenon received the chronicler’s decided anti-Ruthenian tone. The present article established the importance of Długosz’s accusation and explains how this very element had its role in developing negative opinions about Ruthenians in the Annals. The author also provides background information about earlier accusations against Boleslaus regarding his sexual impurity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据Jan Długosz的“编年史”在进入他的编年史第三卷的关系中,Jan Długosz描述了Boleslaus the慷慨的基辅战役,介绍了波兰统治者和随行骑士的道德蜕变。他坚持认为他们犯了所多玛的罪,他们在鲁塞尼亚犯了罪。这一现象招致了编年史家坚决的反鲁塞尼亚语气。本文确立了Długosz指控的重要性,并解释了这一因素如何在《编年史》中对鲁塞尼亚人产生负面看法。作者还提供了关于早先对Boleslaus的性不洁指控的背景资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Barry Coward, Peter Gaunt, Stuartowie. Anglia 1603-1714, przeł. Magdalena Loska Henrik O. Lunde, Dynastia wojowników. Wojny Szwecji 1611-1721 Kilka aktualnych uwag o totalitaryzmie na kanwie rozważań Jasona Stanleya Pod fałszywym sztandarem „naszej cywilizacji” w obronie Zachodu Epilog sprawy Jana Andrzeja Morsztyna w 1683 roku
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1