INFLUENCE OF ACTIVE CHASSIS SYSTEMS ON VEHICLE PROPENSITY TO MANEUVER-INDUCED ROLLOVERS. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS

A. Hać
{"title":"INFLUENCE OF ACTIVE CHASSIS SYSTEMS ON VEHICLE PROPENSITY TO MANEUVER-INDUCED ROLLOVERS. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS","authors":"A. Hać","doi":"10.4271/2002-01-0967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the growing popularity of vehicles with high centers of gravity, the evaluation of rollover propensity of these vehicles becomes an issue of increasing importance. This chapter on the influence of active chassis systems on vehicle propensity to maneuver-induced rollovers is from a comprehensive textbook on occupant and vehicle responses in rollovers. The author considers the influence of three presently-available controlled chassis systems on vehicle rollover resistance. The systems are the active rear steer (ARS), the brake based vehicle stability enhancement system (VSE), and the active roll bar, referred to as dynamic body control (DBC) system. A 16 degree-of-freedom computer model of a full vehicle is used for the study. The maneuvers used in the simulation are the double lane change and the fishhook maneuvers, with increasing steering amplitudes. The results show that the uncontrolled vehicle rolls over in both maneuvers when the steering angle is sufficiently large. The author concluded that all three systems improved vehicle resistance to rollovers, but DBC system was the least effective (primarily due to insufficient speed of response, limited by the power of the hydraulic pump). The VSE system improved vehicle stability more than the ARS system did, and the vehicle with both of these control systems was the most stable of all.","PeriodicalId":291036,"journal":{"name":"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-0967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

With the growing popularity of vehicles with high centers of gravity, the evaluation of rollover propensity of these vehicles becomes an issue of increasing importance. This chapter on the influence of active chassis systems on vehicle propensity to maneuver-induced rollovers is from a comprehensive textbook on occupant and vehicle responses in rollovers. The author considers the influence of three presently-available controlled chassis systems on vehicle rollover resistance. The systems are the active rear steer (ARS), the brake based vehicle stability enhancement system (VSE), and the active roll bar, referred to as dynamic body control (DBC) system. A 16 degree-of-freedom computer model of a full vehicle is used for the study. The maneuvers used in the simulation are the double lane change and the fishhook maneuvers, with increasing steering amplitudes. The results show that the uncontrolled vehicle rolls over in both maneuvers when the steering angle is sufficiently large. The author concluded that all three systems improved vehicle resistance to rollovers, but DBC system was the least effective (primarily due to insufficient speed of response, limited by the power of the hydraulic pump). The VSE system improved vehicle stability more than the ARS system did, and the vehicle with both of these control systems was the most stable of all.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动底盘系统对车辆机动侧翻倾向的影响。在:乘员和车辆对侧翻的反应
随着高重心车辆的日益普及,高重心车辆的侧翻倾向性评价成为一个日益重要的问题。本章关于主动底盘系统对车辆倾向于机动诱导侧翻的影响,是一本关于侧翻中乘员和车辆反应的综合教科书。作者考虑了三种目前可用的控制底盘系统对车辆侧翻阻力的影响。这些系统是主动后转向(ARS)、基于制动的车辆稳定性增强系统(VSE)和主动侧倾杆,即动态车身控制(DBC)系统。研究使用了一个16自由度的整车计算机模型。仿真中采用了双变道机动和鱼钩机动,并增加了转向幅值。结果表明:当转向角足够大时,两种机动工况下的非受控车辆均发生侧翻。作者得出结论,所有三种系统都提高了车辆对侧翻的抵抗力,但DBC系统是最无效的(主要是由于响应速度不足,受液压泵功率的限制)。VSE系统比ARS系统更能提高车辆的稳定性,并且具有这两种控制系统的车辆是最稳定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
INNOVATIVE CHIP SET FOR PRESSURE AND ACCELERATION BASED AIRBAG SOLUTIONS. IN: AIR BAGS AND BELT RESTRAINTS A STUDY OF DRIVER'S MANEUVER CHARACTERISTICS USING THE JOY-STICK DEVICE. IN: HUMAN FACTORS IN DRIVING AND TELEMATICS, AND SEATING COMFORT BOUNCE-OVERS: FIXED OBJECT IMPACTS FOLLOWED BY ROLLOVERS. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS EVALUATION OF A VOICE-ACTIVATED SYSTEM USING A DRIVING SIMULATOR. IN: HUMAN FACTORS IN DRIVING AND TELEMATICS, AND SEATING COMFORT HOW TO USE PC-CRASH TO SIMULATE ROLLOVER CRASHES. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1