Hva settes i spill når ledere i kulturskolen planlegger elevenes timeplaner? Om en rhizomatisk forståelse av organisasjonen kulturskole og hvordan en slik forståelse kan berike kulturskolens samarbeid med andre aktører

Mali Hauen, Anne Berit Emstad
{"title":"Hva settes i spill når ledere i kulturskolen planlegger elevenes timeplaner? Om en rhizomatisk forståelse av organisasjonen kulturskole og hvordan en slik forståelse kan berike kulturskolens samarbeid med andre aktører","authors":"Mali Hauen, Anne Berit Emstad","doi":"10.23865/noasp.152.ch2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a study that has examined the factors that come into play when “kulturskolen” sets its timetable for teaching. The findings indicate that kulturskolen must relate to internal considerations such as aspects concerning cooperation on pupils, teachers, localities and locations, but also external considerations such as political documents and interpretation of the Norwegian Education Act. To discuss the complexity that emerges in the analyzes, we look at the data material in the light of the philosophers Deleuze and Guattari (1988) and Rosi Braidotti (2013). We argue that the complexity taken into account when scheduling timetables is describing a certain understanding of kulturskolen as an organization. Kulturskolen is understood as a rhizome, and the complexity propels the school forward in constant evolution. This complexity is also important when kulturskolen is to collaborate with others. If kulturskolen is to collaborate well with compulsory schools, the complexity presents some challenges. Where kulturskolen can be described as a web of various influencial factors, we find compulsory schools better regulated and perhaps more linear, with clear requirements for learning goals and skills in the curriculum for basic education (Kunnskapsdepartementet, 2017). We believe there is a missed opportunity for collaboration when seeing kulturskolen in a rhizomatic context.","PeriodicalId":402443,"journal":{"name":"Utdanning i kunstfag: Samarbeid, kvalitet og spenninger","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utdanning i kunstfag: Samarbeid, kvalitet og spenninger","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.152.ch2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a study that has examined the factors that come into play when “kulturskolen” sets its timetable for teaching. The findings indicate that kulturskolen must relate to internal considerations such as aspects concerning cooperation on pupils, teachers, localities and locations, but also external considerations such as political documents and interpretation of the Norwegian Education Act. To discuss the complexity that emerges in the analyzes, we look at the data material in the light of the philosophers Deleuze and Guattari (1988) and Rosi Braidotti (2013). We argue that the complexity taken into account when scheduling timetables is describing a certain understanding of kulturskolen as an organization. Kulturskolen is understood as a rhizome, and the complexity propels the school forward in constant evolution. This complexity is also important when kulturskolen is to collaborate with others. If kulturskolen is to collaborate well with compulsory schools, the complexity presents some challenges. Where kulturskolen can be described as a web of various influencial factors, we find compulsory schools better regulated and perhaps more linear, with clear requirements for learning goals and skills in the curriculum for basic education (Kunnskapsdepartementet, 2017). We believe there is a missed opportunity for collaboration when seeing kulturskolen in a rhizomatic context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文提出了一项研究,该研究考察了在“文化素养”设定教学时间表时起作用的因素。调查结果表明,文化交流必须涉及内部考虑,如学生、教师、地区和地点的合作,但也涉及外部考虑,如政治文件和对《挪威教育法》的解释。为了讨论分析中出现的复杂性,我们从哲学家德勒兹(Deleuze)和瓜塔里(Guattari, 1988)以及罗西·布雷多蒂(Rosi Braidotti, 2013)的角度来看待数据材料。我们认为,在安排时间表时考虑到的复杂性描述了对文化作为一个组织的一定理解。Kulturskolen被理解为一个根茎,其复杂性推动着学校在不断的进化中向前发展。当文化知识要与他人合作时,这种复杂性也很重要。如果文化教育要与义务教育很好地合作,这种复杂性带来了一些挑战。在文化素养可以被描述为各种影响因素的网络的情况下,我们发现义务教育受到更好的监管,也许更线性,对基础教育课程中的学习目标和技能有明确的要求(kunnskapsdepartentet, 2017)。我们认为,在根状背景下看待文化skolen,错失了合作的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vinn-vinn? En studie av «Sentrum-prosjektet» – et samarbeid mellom grunnskole og kulturskole Samarbeid mellom kulturskolelærer og grunnskolelærer – utfordringer og muligheter Transgressions Towards Difference: A Tertiary Arts Educator’s Reflection on Teaching in Norway #livet#døden#kjærligheten – et narrativ av vevd og levd undervisningsliv Perspektiver fra forskningen på det musikkpedagogiske konseptet Jedem Kind ein Instrument [Et instrument til hvert barn] i Tyskland1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1