The Han River: Water Quality & Ecosystem-A Comparison with the Potomac River Management-

Y. Choi
{"title":"The Han River: Water Quality & Ecosystem-A Comparison with the Potomac River Management-","authors":"Y. Choi","doi":"10.1080/12265934.1999.9693440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparing two capital cities of the United States and Korea from the water resources management has not been attempted. This is the first attempt. Comparative study will make knowledge more scientific and more desirable. Washington, D.C. and Seoul have recently had financial difficulties (due to different reasons: typical urban fiscal fiasco, e.g., flight of middle class to the suburbia in the US and the national financial crisis in Korea), and deteriorating environmental infrastructure and lack of commitment to improve environmental structure and system. Two cities have the same mandate to reduce point- and non-point sources of pollutants, e.g., urban runoff and upstream farming runoff. However, Washington offers a lesson to Seoul: Regional river basin approach and privatization. Washington, D.C. and its suburbia jointly run the Blue Plains Wastewater Plant; Montgomery County and Prince George's County run the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission as a private utility firm manages drinking water and wa...","PeriodicalId":131083,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Urban Sciences","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Urban Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.1999.9693440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comparing two capital cities of the United States and Korea from the water resources management has not been attempted. This is the first attempt. Comparative study will make knowledge more scientific and more desirable. Washington, D.C. and Seoul have recently had financial difficulties (due to different reasons: typical urban fiscal fiasco, e.g., flight of middle class to the suburbia in the US and the national financial crisis in Korea), and deteriorating environmental infrastructure and lack of commitment to improve environmental structure and system. Two cities have the same mandate to reduce point- and non-point sources of pollutants, e.g., urban runoff and upstream farming runoff. However, Washington offers a lesson to Seoul: Regional river basin approach and privatization. Washington, D.C. and its suburbia jointly run the Blue Plains Wastewater Plant; Montgomery County and Prince George's County run the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission as a private utility firm manages drinking water and wa...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
汉江:水质与生态系统——与波托马克河管理的比较
从水资源管理的角度对美国和韩国的两个首都进行比较还没有尝试过。这是第一次尝试。比较研究将使知识更科学,更可取。华盛顿特区和首尔最近都遇到了财政困难(原因各不相同:典型的城市财政惨败,如美国中产阶级向郊区迁移和韩国的国家金融危机),环境基础设施恶化,缺乏改善环境结构和系统的承诺。两个城市有同样的任务,即减少污染物的点源和非点源,例如城市径流和上游农业径流。但是,美国给韩国提供了一个教训:地区流域方法和民营化。华盛顿特区及其郊区共同经营蓝原污水处理厂;蒙哥马利县和乔治王子县将华盛顿郊区卫生委员会作为一家私人公用事业公司管理饮用水和水……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Three-Nation Comparison on Mayors' Policy Preferences: Korea, Japan, and the USA Regional Financial Markets and Financial Restructuring in Korea Local Agenda 21: Seoul Toward an Environmental City Approximate Solutions for KI and COD in CCT and CT Specimens Subjected to Closure Obstruction on the Crack Surface The Use of Tourist Money Flow Analysis in Measuring the Impact of Tourism Development on the Regional Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1