Evaluation of the Effect of Magnification on Proximal Caries Diagnosis Via Digital Bitewing Radiography

Sahel Kamgar, A. Talaeipour, L. Hafezi
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effect of Magnification on Proximal Caries Diagnosis Via Digital Bitewing Radiography","authors":"Sahel Kamgar, A. Talaeipour, L. Hafezi","doi":"10.18502/ijds.v17i4.8657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: identification of proximal caries is a major challenge faced by dentists. Bitewing radiograph is the method commonly used to detect proximal caries. Another method includes the use of magnification in digital bitewing radiograph. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of magnification on the diagnosis of proximal caries. \nMaterials and Methods: In this descriptive study 40 sound human molars and premolars were selected. Based on the gold standard, the cavities were prepared under contact point on one proximal surface of the tooth. Teeth were mounted and digital bitewing radiographs were taken and images were observed at magnifications 5x, 4x, 3x, 2x, 1x. Every tooth was assessed for caries on a 5 point scale. The data was analyzed by Cochrane- Q test. \nResults: There was a significant difference between the certain sensitivity of proximal caries diagnosis in digital radiography in groups with magnitudes 1, 2 and 3 with magnitude 4 and 5 groups (p value = 0.04). However, between the probable sensitivity (p value = 0.298), definite NVP (p value = 0.496) and probable NVP (p value = 0.819), definite attribute (p value = 0.846) and probability (P) There was no significant difference in proximal caries diagnosis. \nConclusion: The accuracy in detecting proximal caries increases with a magnification increase and magnification 2x and 3x have the highest diagnostic accuracy but over increased magnification can reduce the accuracy on proximal caries diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":221865,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Isfahan Dental School","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Isfahan Dental School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijds.v17i4.8657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: identification of proximal caries is a major challenge faced by dentists. Bitewing radiograph is the method commonly used to detect proximal caries. Another method includes the use of magnification in digital bitewing radiograph. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of magnification on the diagnosis of proximal caries. Materials and Methods: In this descriptive study 40 sound human molars and premolars were selected. Based on the gold standard, the cavities were prepared under contact point on one proximal surface of the tooth. Teeth were mounted and digital bitewing radiographs were taken and images were observed at magnifications 5x, 4x, 3x, 2x, 1x. Every tooth was assessed for caries on a 5 point scale. The data was analyzed by Cochrane- Q test. Results: There was a significant difference between the certain sensitivity of proximal caries diagnosis in digital radiography in groups with magnitudes 1, 2 and 3 with magnitude 4 and 5 groups (p value = 0.04). However, between the probable sensitivity (p value = 0.298), definite NVP (p value = 0.496) and probable NVP (p value = 0.819), definite attribute (p value = 0.846) and probability (P) There was no significant difference in proximal caries diagnosis. Conclusion: The accuracy in detecting proximal caries increases with a magnification increase and magnification 2x and 3x have the highest diagnostic accuracy but over increased magnification can reduce the accuracy on proximal caries diagnosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字咬翼造影放大对近端龋诊断效果的评价
简介:近端龋齿的识别是牙医面临的主要挑战。咬翼x线片是检测近端龋齿的常用方法。另一种方法包括在数字咬翼x线摄影中使用放大。本研究的目的是评估放大对近端龋的诊断效果。材料与方法:选取40颗正常的人磨牙和前磨牙进行描述性研究。根据金标准,在牙齿近端表面的接触点下制备空腔。安装牙齿,拍摄数码咬翼x线片,在5倍、4倍、3倍、2倍、1倍倍率下观察图像。每颗牙齿都以5分制评估是否有龋齿。数据采用Cochrane- Q检验分析。结果:1、2、3等数量级组与4、5等数量级组数字x线摄影对近端龋诊断的一定敏感性差异有统计学意义(p值= 0.04)。而可能敏感性(p值= 0.298)、确定NVP (p值= 0.496)与可能NVP (p值= 0.819)、确定属性(p值= 0.846)、概率(p)对近端龋的诊断差异无统计学意义。结论:近端龋的诊断准确率随着放大倍数的增加而提高,放大倍数2x和3x的诊断准确率最高,放大倍数过大会降低近端龋的诊断准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Morphological Variations of Canal and Root of First Mandibular Molar in Tomographic Images Computer with Cone Beam in Patients of Arak City Treatment of Severe Anterior Open-bite Accompany with Impacted Canine: A Case Report The Ability of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Periodontal Tissue Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review of Literature Immunohistochemical Expression of Alpha Smooth Muscle Actin Positive Myofibroblast and Laminin 5 gamma 2 in Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Verrucous Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity Evaluation of the Relationship between rs17561 and rs1143634 Genetic Polymorphisms and the Risk of Chronic Periodontitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1