TOWARDS A NEW STRATEGY FOR EU ENLARGEMENT – BETWEEN THE WISH FOR AN ENCOURAGEMENT, THE REALITY OF THE FATIGUE AND THE THREAT OF A DEAD END

Uros Cemalovic
{"title":"TOWARDS A NEW STRATEGY FOR EU ENLARGEMENT – BETWEEN THE WISH FOR AN ENCOURAGEMENT, THE REALITY OF THE FATIGUE AND THE THREAT OF A DEAD END","authors":"Uros Cemalovic","doi":"10.25234/eclic/11905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"European Unions (EU) enlargement policy is, for at least halfa decade, facing a reality that, with quite some benevolence, could be defined as an orientation crisis, accompanied with a substantial lack of clarity and precision The fact that, during the second half of 2019, both North Macedonia (NM) and Albania (AL) have not achieved the status of candidate countries was only a symptom - unfortunately not devoid of still unforeseeable internal political and economic consequences - of undeniable and profound discord between the EU member states over the future of the Union's enlargement policy When it comes to the two countries of the Western Balkans - Serbia (SR) and Montenegro (MN) - that are already in the process of membership negotiation, their relatively poor progress in 2019 - with either no further chapters provisionally closed (MN) or with only one chapter opened (SR) - only confirms the initial assessment about the fundamental crisis of this important EU policy On the basis of scarce and mostly underdeveloped elements of the new enlargement methodology presented by the Commission in February 2020, this paper - using content analysis and scrutiny of negotiation-related polices of candidate countries - seeks to go beyond questions of conditionality and benchmarks, in order to examine some major consequences that this potentially new enlargement strategy could have In spite of the fact that the focus of the analysis is put on some major changes the reorientation of this policy would entail, the author also examines (and, to some extent, predicts) what are the potential benefits and/or threats the new methodology could bring to both candidates and the EU itself Without any pretention to provide final answers and apodictic conclusions, this paper proposes some elements of fine-tuning, in order to better define a potential change that encompasses the following three controversial elements: the wish for an encouragement, the reality of the fatigue and the threat of a dead end","PeriodicalId":448091,"journal":{"name":"EU 2020 – lessons from the past and solutions for the future","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EU 2020 – lessons from the past and solutions for the future","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/11905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

European Unions (EU) enlargement policy is, for at least halfa decade, facing a reality that, with quite some benevolence, could be defined as an orientation crisis, accompanied with a substantial lack of clarity and precision The fact that, during the second half of 2019, both North Macedonia (NM) and Albania (AL) have not achieved the status of candidate countries was only a symptom - unfortunately not devoid of still unforeseeable internal political and economic consequences - of undeniable and profound discord between the EU member states over the future of the Union's enlargement policy When it comes to the two countries of the Western Balkans - Serbia (SR) and Montenegro (MN) - that are already in the process of membership negotiation, their relatively poor progress in 2019 - with either no further chapters provisionally closed (MN) or with only one chapter opened (SR) - only confirms the initial assessment about the fundamental crisis of this important EU policy On the basis of scarce and mostly underdeveloped elements of the new enlargement methodology presented by the Commission in February 2020, this paper - using content analysis and scrutiny of negotiation-related polices of candidate countries - seeks to go beyond questions of conditionality and benchmarks, in order to examine some major consequences that this potentially new enlargement strategy could have In spite of the fact that the focus of the analysis is put on some major changes the reorientation of this policy would entail, the author also examines (and, to some extent, predicts) what are the potential benefits and/or threats the new methodology could bring to both candidates and the EU itself Without any pretention to provide final answers and apodictic conclusions, this paper proposes some elements of fine-tuning, in order to better define a potential change that encompasses the following three controversial elements: the wish for an encouragement, the reality of the fatigue and the threat of a dead end
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向欧盟扩大的新战略——在希望得到鼓励的愿望、疲惫的现实和死胡同的威胁之间
至少五年来,欧盟(EU)的扩大政策面临着这样一个现实,尽管有些善意,但它可以被定义为一场定位危机,同时严重缺乏明确性和精确性。北马其顿(NM)和阿尔巴尼亚(AL)都没有获得候选国的地位,这只是欧盟成员国之间在欧盟扩大政策的未来上不可否认的深刻分歧的一个症状——不幸的是,这并不是没有不可预见的内部政治和经济后果。当谈到西巴尔干的两个国家——塞尔维亚(SR)和黑山(MN)时,它们已经在进行入盟谈判。他们在2019年的进展相对较差——要么没有进一步的章节暂时关闭(MN),要么只有一个章节打开(SR)——只证实了对这一重要欧盟政策的根本危机的初步评估,该评估基于欧盟委员会在2020年2月提出的新扩大方法中稀缺且大多不发达的要素。本文利用对候选国谈判相关政策的内容分析和审查,力求超越条件和基准的问题,以便审查这种潜在的新的扩大战略可能产生的一些主要后果。尽管分析的重点放在这一政策的重新定位将带来的一些重大变化上,但作者还审查(并在某种程度上,新方法可能给候选人和欧盟本身带来的潜在好处和/或威胁是什么?本文无意提供最终答案和绝对结论,本文提出了一些微调要素,以便更好地定义包含以下三个有争议因素的潜在变化:希望得到鼓励,疲劳的现实和死胡同的威胁
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MODERN CHALLENGES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CHILD’S RIGHT TO KNOW HIS ORIGIN PROCEDURAL RIGHTS OF SUSPECTS AND ACCUSED PERSONS DURING PRE-TRIAL DETENTION – IMPACT OF DETENTION CONDITIONS ON EFFICIENT EXERCISE OF DEFENCE RIGHTS ROLE OF COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION IN ESTABLISHMENT OF EU STANDARDS ON INDEPENDENCE OF JUDICIARY STANDING IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AFTER URGENDA, JULIANA AND COVID-19 CRISES: WHO SHOULD FORCE GOVERNMENTS TO ACT IN ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES RELATED TO CLIMATE CHANGE? ATYPICAL FORMS OF EMPLOYMENT – A HINT OF PRECARIOUSNESS? STRUGGLING WITH THE SEGMENTATION AND PRECARISATION OF THE LABOUR MARKET
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1