When underwater acoustic nodes should sleep with one eye open: idle-time power management in underwater sensor networks

A. Harris, M. Stojanovic, M. Zorzi
{"title":"When underwater acoustic nodes should sleep with one eye open: idle-time power management in underwater sensor networks","authors":"A. Harris, M. Stojanovic, M. Zorzi","doi":"10.1145/1161039.1161061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current interest in underwater sensor networks stems from the potential to use long term sensing devices to monitor the large mass of oceans on the planet (e.g., underwater seismic event monitoring or underwater oil rig monitoring). To accomplish this, the sensor nodes must have the ability to self-configure the communication network and provide energy-efficient data transmission. To this end, researchers have begun devising MAC-layer protocols that minimize energy consumption for data transmission. Acoustic modems typically present a number of modes of operation, similar to radio interfaces (e.g., transmit, receive, sleep, etc.), each of which consumes different levels of energy. In radio communications, the cost of keeping the interfaces idle is high; therefore, a number of idle-time power management solutions have been devised (e.g., GAF [1], STEM [2], TITAN [3]) to conserve energy during times of no communication. It is natural to attempt to use these same methods for energy conservation in underwater sensor networks. However, there are significant differences between acoustic modems and radios transceivers, making it doubtful whether previous conclusions will be valid for the underwater environment. The relative costs of various interface modes are significantly different for acoustic devices than for radios. Typical radio interfaces [4] have similar costs for transmitting, receiving and idling. On the other hand, acoustic modems have very high transmission costs with respect to receive costs, and have very low idle costs.","PeriodicalId":180011,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Underwater Networks","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"63","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Underwater Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1161039.1161061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

Abstract

The current interest in underwater sensor networks stems from the potential to use long term sensing devices to monitor the large mass of oceans on the planet (e.g., underwater seismic event monitoring or underwater oil rig monitoring). To accomplish this, the sensor nodes must have the ability to self-configure the communication network and provide energy-efficient data transmission. To this end, researchers have begun devising MAC-layer protocols that minimize energy consumption for data transmission. Acoustic modems typically present a number of modes of operation, similar to radio interfaces (e.g., transmit, receive, sleep, etc.), each of which consumes different levels of energy. In radio communications, the cost of keeping the interfaces idle is high; therefore, a number of idle-time power management solutions have been devised (e.g., GAF [1], STEM [2], TITAN [3]) to conserve energy during times of no communication. It is natural to attempt to use these same methods for energy conservation in underwater sensor networks. However, there are significant differences between acoustic modems and radios transceivers, making it doubtful whether previous conclusions will be valid for the underwater environment. The relative costs of various interface modes are significantly different for acoustic devices than for radios. Typical radio interfaces [4] have similar costs for transmitting, receiving and idling. On the other hand, acoustic modems have very high transmission costs with respect to receive costs, and have very low idle costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当水声节点应该睁一只眼睡觉:水下传感器网络的空闲时间电源管理
目前对水下传感器网络的兴趣源于使用长期传感设备监测地球上大量海洋的潜力(例如,水下地震事件监测或水下石油钻井平台监测)。为了实现这一点,传感器节点必须具有自配置通信网络的能力,并提供节能的数据传输。为此,研究人员已经开始设计mac层协议,以最大限度地减少数据传输的能耗。声学调制解调器通常呈现出许多操作模式,类似于无线电接口(例如,发送、接收、睡眠等),每种模式消耗不同水平的能量。在无线电通信中,保持接口空闲的成本很高;因此,已经设计了许多空闲时间电源管理解决方案(例如,GAF [1], STEM [2], TITAN[3]),以在无通信期间节省能源。在水下传感器网络中尝试使用相同的节能方法是很自然的。然而,声学调制解调器和无线电收发器之间存在显著差异,这使得之前的结论是否适用于水下环境值得怀疑。各种接口模式的相对成本对于声学设备和无线电设备来说有很大的不同。典型的无线电接口[4]具有类似的发送、接收和空转成本。另一方面,声学调制解调器有非常高的传输成本相对于接收成本,并有非常低的闲置成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A survey of practical issues in underwater networks Status packet deprecation and store-forward routing in AUSNet A MAC protocol for ad-hoc underwater acoustic sensor networks Sensor networks of freely drifting autonomous underwater explorers Cooperative multihop communication for underwater acoustic networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1