So Said Laozi: How Daoism Explains 'Creating Shared Value'

Joseph L. Pratt
{"title":"So Said Laozi: How Daoism Explains 'Creating Shared Value'","authors":"Joseph L. Pratt","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2843368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In January 2011 Harvard Business School Professor Michael Porter and his long-time corporate responsibility collaborator Mark Kramer advanced the principle of “Creating Shared Value” (CSV). Heralded as “The Big Idea” in the Harvard Business Review, CSV promised to transcend the longstanding divide between a company’s pursuit of financial profit and its larger obligations to society. Though the likes of the Clinton Global Initiative have backed CSV, many commentators have criticized it as being either a cherry-picked version of “Corporate Social Responsibility” (CSR), and therefore unoriginal, or simply an unrealistic socio-economic agenda. Daoism, an ancient Chinese wisdom, dispels this latter skepticism by explaining why CSV is possible and how such a change would work in practice. It also shows how CSR, and the economic system upon which it is based, is unsustainable. In the end, Daoism suggests that CSV may even hold the key to returning society to a genuine state of liberty.","PeriodicalId":245549,"journal":{"name":"Business History eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business History eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2843368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In January 2011 Harvard Business School Professor Michael Porter and his long-time corporate responsibility collaborator Mark Kramer advanced the principle of “Creating Shared Value” (CSV). Heralded as “The Big Idea” in the Harvard Business Review, CSV promised to transcend the longstanding divide between a company’s pursuit of financial profit and its larger obligations to society. Though the likes of the Clinton Global Initiative have backed CSV, many commentators have criticized it as being either a cherry-picked version of “Corporate Social Responsibility” (CSR), and therefore unoriginal, or simply an unrealistic socio-economic agenda. Daoism, an ancient Chinese wisdom, dispels this latter skepticism by explaining why CSV is possible and how such a change would work in practice. It also shows how CSR, and the economic system upon which it is based, is unsustainable. In the end, Daoism suggests that CSV may even hold the key to returning society to a genuine state of liberty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老子这么说:道家如何解释“创造共享价值”
2011年1月,哈佛商学院教授迈克尔·波特和他长期的企业责任合作伙伴马克·克莱默提出了“创造共享价值”(CSV)原则。CSV被《哈佛商业评论》(Harvard Business Review)誉为“大创意”,它承诺将超越公司追求财务利润与对社会承担更大责任之间的长期鸿沟。虽然克林顿全球倡议等组织支持CSV,但许多评论家批评它要么是“企业社会责任”(CSR)的精选版本,因此缺乏原创性,要么就是一个不切实际的社会经济议程。中国古代的智慧——道家学说,通过解释为什么CSV是可能的,以及这种变化如何在实践中发挥作用,消除了后一种怀疑。它还表明,企业社会责任及其赖以生存的经济体系是不可持续的。最后,道家认为,CSV甚至可能是让社会回归真正自由状态的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Continuity and Change in Construction Procurement William Henry Cavendish-Bentinck-Scott, 4th Duke of Portland Emergence of Modern Impersonal Exchange: Role of Formalization in the Rise of Modern Capitalism Samuelson’s Neoclassical Synthesis Did Not Betray Keynes: Keynes Had Offered Just Such a Synthesis in the General Theory, As Well As to Hicks and Harrod in Correspondence, in 1936 Longitudinal Study of Seylan Bank, Sri Lanka from 1996 to 2008
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1