{"title":"Optimization of the Legal Regulation of Preparation of a Civil Case for Hearing","authors":"E. Potapenko","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-6-16-20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article proves the need to prepare a case for trial as an obligatory stage in the civil process. In present times there is an ineffective implementation of the norms regulating the preparation of a case for trial, norms are ignored during legal proceedings in specific civil cases. One of the factors for this problem is a lack of clarity and consistent legal regulation. Many procedural norms, related to the implementation of preparatory procedures, are set out in the framework of other institutions (proof, filing a claim). Within the law norms on preparation constitute underdeveloped complexes that represent a large degree of discretion to the court; the institution of preparation is not structured. The author proposes both a normative adjustment of the rules for preparing a case and the improvement of this institution through the law-interpretation activity of the judicial authorities.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-6-16-20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article proves the need to prepare a case for trial as an obligatory stage in the civil process. In present times there is an ineffective implementation of the norms regulating the preparation of a case for trial, norms are ignored during legal proceedings in specific civil cases. One of the factors for this problem is a lack of clarity and consistent legal regulation. Many procedural norms, related to the implementation of preparatory procedures, are set out in the framework of other institutions (proof, filing a claim). Within the law norms on preparation constitute underdeveloped complexes that represent a large degree of discretion to the court; the institution of preparation is not structured. The author proposes both a normative adjustment of the rules for preparing a case and the improvement of this institution through the law-interpretation activity of the judicial authorities.