Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Ukrainian version of the Standardized Evaluation of Pain (StEP) — a tool for assessing neuropathic pain in the lower back in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

I. Kedyk, Y. Shalkovskyi, I. Shapoval, M. Stanislavchuk
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Ukrainian version of the Standardized Evaluation of Pain (StEP) — a tool for assessing neuropathic pain in the lower back in patients with ankylosing spondylitis","authors":"I. Kedyk, Y. Shalkovskyi, I. Shapoval, M. Stanislavchuk","doi":"10.30978/unj2022-3-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective — to create a Ukrainian‑language version of the Standardized Evaluation of Pain (StEP) through translation and cross‑cultural adaptation with subsequent validation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). \nMethods and subjects. The translation and cross‑cultural adaptation of the StEP questionnaire was carried out in accordance with the standard recommendations of the Guidelines for the process of cross‑cultural adaptation of self‑report measures. 49 patients with a diagnosis of AS according to the modified New York criteria and duration of pain in the lower back ≥ 3 months and 31 persons of the control group were examined. AS activity in patients was assessed using the ASDAS (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score) and BASDAI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index), functional status — according to the BASFI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index) and BASMI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index) indices. The ASQoL (Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionnaire) index was used to assess the quality of life of AS patients. The intensity of pain in AS patients was determined using a visual analog scale. The Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs (LANSS) and the DN4 questionnaire (Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions) were used to compare the results of the StEP questionnaire. The statistical analysis of the results was carried out using the methods of variational statistics using the SPSS22 software package (SPSS Inc.). \nResults. According to disease activity indices, high and very high disease activity prevailed in patients with AS: the average value according to ASDAS was 3.8 ± 0.8, according to BASDAI — 5.5 ± 1.2. Functional disorders according to BASFI were 5.2 ± 1.8 on average, range of motion in the spine according to BASMI was 5.2 ± 2.3. The quality of life of patients with AS according to ASQoL was on average 8.3 ± 4.4. Pain intensity according to the visual analog scale — 6.1 ± 1.5. The reliability of the Ukrainian‑language version of the StEP questionnaire was assessed by the test‑retest method with an interval of 7 days in 22 patients with AS. The analysis of the received data proved the high reliability of the StEP questionnaire (intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.987). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (0.987) confirmed the internal consistency of the Ukrainian version of the StEP questionnaire. The sensitivity of the StEP questionnaire showed a close pairwise correlation (Spearman’s correlation coefficient — 0.955). Testing of the StEP questionnaire in patients with AS revealed the presence of neuropathic pain in 55.1 % of cases. The average value of the StEP questionnaire in AS patients was 4.6 ± 5.3, in the control group it was 0.1 ± 0.4. The final values of the StEP questionnaire were statistically significantly correlated with LANSS and DN4 indicators (p < 0.01). \nConclusions. The Ukrainian‑language version of the StEP questionnaire was created, and its cross‑cultural adaptation and validation was carried out. The Ukrainian‑language version of the StEP questionnaire showed a sufficient level of reliability and validity for further use in scientific and medical practice for the Ukrainian‑speaking population. In patients with AS, using the Ukrainian version of the StEP questionnaire, the presence of a neuropathic component of the pain syndrome is detected in 55 % of cases, which should be taken into account when treating this cohort of patients. \n ","PeriodicalId":296251,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Neurological Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Neurological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30978/unj2022-3-39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective — to create a Ukrainian‑language version of the Standardized Evaluation of Pain (StEP) through translation and cross‑cultural adaptation with subsequent validation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods and subjects. The translation and cross‑cultural adaptation of the StEP questionnaire was carried out in accordance with the standard recommendations of the Guidelines for the process of cross‑cultural adaptation of self‑report measures. 49 patients with a diagnosis of AS according to the modified New York criteria and duration of pain in the lower back ≥ 3 months and 31 persons of the control group were examined. AS activity in patients was assessed using the ASDAS (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score) and BASDAI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index), functional status — according to the BASFI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index) and BASMI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index) indices. The ASQoL (Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionnaire) index was used to assess the quality of life of AS patients. The intensity of pain in AS patients was determined using a visual analog scale. The Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs (LANSS) and the DN4 questionnaire (Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions) were used to compare the results of the StEP questionnaire. The statistical analysis of the results was carried out using the methods of variational statistics using the SPSS22 software package (SPSS Inc.). Results. According to disease activity indices, high and very high disease activity prevailed in patients with AS: the average value according to ASDAS was 3.8 ± 0.8, according to BASDAI — 5.5 ± 1.2. Functional disorders according to BASFI were 5.2 ± 1.8 on average, range of motion in the spine according to BASMI was 5.2 ± 2.3. The quality of life of patients with AS according to ASQoL was on average 8.3 ± 4.4. Pain intensity according to the visual analog scale — 6.1 ± 1.5. The reliability of the Ukrainian‑language version of the StEP questionnaire was assessed by the test‑retest method with an interval of 7 days in 22 patients with AS. The analysis of the received data proved the high reliability of the StEP questionnaire (intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.987). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (0.987) confirmed the internal consistency of the Ukrainian version of the StEP questionnaire. The sensitivity of the StEP questionnaire showed a close pairwise correlation (Spearman’s correlation coefficient — 0.955). Testing of the StEP questionnaire in patients with AS revealed the presence of neuropathic pain in 55.1 % of cases. The average value of the StEP questionnaire in AS patients was 4.6 ± 5.3, in the control group it was 0.1 ± 0.4. The final values of the StEP questionnaire were statistically significantly correlated with LANSS and DN4 indicators (p < 0.01). Conclusions. The Ukrainian‑language version of the StEP questionnaire was created, and its cross‑cultural adaptation and validation was carried out. The Ukrainian‑language version of the StEP questionnaire showed a sufficient level of reliability and validity for further use in scientific and medical practice for the Ukrainian‑speaking population. In patients with AS, using the Ukrainian version of the StEP questionnaire, the presence of a neuropathic component of the pain syndrome is detected in 55 % of cases, which should be taken into account when treating this cohort of patients.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌克兰版本的疼痛标准化评估(StEP)的跨文化适应和验证-一种评估强直性脊柱炎患者下背部神经性疼痛的工具
目的:通过翻译和跨文化适应,在强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者中创建乌克兰语版本的疼痛标准化评估(StEP)。方法和对象。StEP问卷的翻译和跨文化适应是按照《自我报告措施跨文化适应过程指南》的标准建议进行的。研究对象为49例根据修改后的纽约标准诊断为AS且腰背部疼痛持续时间≥3个月的患者和31例对照组。使用ASDAS(强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分)和BASDAI(浴式强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数)评估患者的AS活动,根据BASFI(浴式强直性脊柱炎功能指数)和BASMI(浴式强直性脊柱炎计量指数)指数评估功能状态。采用ASQoL(强直性脊柱炎生活质量问卷)指数评价AS患者的生活质量。采用视觉模拟量表测定AS患者的疼痛强度。采用利兹神经性症状和体征评估(LANSS)和DN4问卷(双神经性问题)来比较StEP问卷的结果。采用SPSS22软件包(SPSS Inc.)的变分统计方法对结果进行统计分析。结果。根据疾病活动性指数,AS患者的疾病活动性以高和非常高为主:ASDAS平均值为3.8±0.8,BASDAI平均值为5.5±1.2。BASFI评分的功能障碍平均为5.2±1.8,BASMI评分的脊柱活动度平均为5.2±2.3。ASQoL患者的生活质量平均为8.3±4.4。疼痛强度按视觉模拟量表- 6.1±1.5。在22例AS患者中,采用间隔7天的重测法评估乌克兰语版StEP问卷的可靠性。对收到的资料进行分析,证明StEP问卷具有较高的信度(类内相关系数为0.987)。Cronbach 's alpha系数(0.987)证实乌克兰版StEP问卷的内部一致性。StEP问卷的敏感性呈密切的两两相关(Spearman相关系数- 0.955)。对AS患者的StEP问卷测试显示55.1%的病例存在神经性疼痛。AS患者StEP问卷的平均值为4.6±5.3,对照组为0.1±0.4。StEP问卷最终值与LANSS、DN4指标有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。结论。创建了StEP问卷的乌克兰语版本,并对其进行了跨文化调整和验证。StEP问卷的乌克兰文版本显示出足够的可靠性和有效性,可以进一步用于讲乌克兰语人口的科学和医疗实践。在AS患者中,使用乌克兰版本的StEP问卷,在55%的病例中检测到疼痛综合征的神经性成分,在治疗这组患者时应考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prospects of using gene therapy and nanotechnologies for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases Neuropathic component of pain in patients with mine blast wounds Study of associations between the -108C/T Polymorphism of the PON1 gene and clinical syndromes, neuroimaging changes indicated by transcranial doppler sonography of cerebral vessels, and cognitive dysfunction in patients with chronic alcohol-induced encep Indicators of bioelectrical activity of the brain in duodenal ulcer in the acute stage depending on the presence of Helicobacter pylori in patientss The role of ultrasound screening in the diagnosis of small vessel disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1