Make Ready Planning Using Flow Walks: A New Approach to Collaboratively Identifying Project Constraints

Paul J. Ebbs, L. Christine, Pasquire
{"title":"Make Ready Planning Using Flow Walks: A New Approach to Collaboratively Identifying Project Constraints","authors":"Paul J. Ebbs, L. Christine, Pasquire","doi":"10.24928/2018/0448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many authors identify flow and pull as key lean production principles. In lean construction (LC)these principles are embodied within the “Last Planner® System” (LPS) to create more reliable workflow which is the heart of Lean Project Delivery. LPS has continued to evolve and develop over the last 25 years with pull planning – identifying what tasks SHOULD be done the last major elementadded. However, “pull planning” is often misunderstood as the entirety of LPS and frequently referred to as “Last Planner”. The remaining levels of the Last Planner “System” – CAN; WILL; DID and LEARN are not being used as originally intended by LPS developers Ballard and Howell. The struggle often begins with Make Ready Planning (CAN). This paper is the first output of a two-year research project focused on implementing the CAN; WILL; DID; LEARN levels of LPS within organisation (X). It outlines how the 8 Flows of Lean Project Delivery andthe“Flow Walk” are being used as a structured approach to collaboratively identify constraints and incorporate them into the risk registers and Make Ready Planning. This approach was effective to identify constraints and also create a shared understanding of project scope within project teams.","PeriodicalId":419313,"journal":{"name":"26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24928/2018/0448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Many authors identify flow and pull as key lean production principles. In lean construction (LC)these principles are embodied within the “Last Planner® System” (LPS) to create more reliable workflow which is the heart of Lean Project Delivery. LPS has continued to evolve and develop over the last 25 years with pull planning – identifying what tasks SHOULD be done the last major elementadded. However, “pull planning” is often misunderstood as the entirety of LPS and frequently referred to as “Last Planner”. The remaining levels of the Last Planner “System” – CAN; WILL; DID and LEARN are not being used as originally intended by LPS developers Ballard and Howell. The struggle often begins with Make Ready Planning (CAN). This paper is the first output of a two-year research project focused on implementing the CAN; WILL; DID; LEARN levels of LPS within organisation (X). It outlines how the 8 Flows of Lean Project Delivery andthe“Flow Walk” are being used as a structured approach to collaboratively identify constraints and incorporate them into the risk registers and Make Ready Planning. This approach was effective to identify constraints and also create a shared understanding of project scope within project teams.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用流程行走制定计划:一种协同识别项目约束的新方法
许多作者认为流和拉是精益生产的关键原则。在精益建设(LC)中,这些原则体现在“最后计划者®系统”(LPS)中,以创建更可靠的工作流程,这是精益项目交付的核心。在过去的25年里,LPS一直在不断发展和发展拉动计划-确定应该完成的任务,并添加最后一个主要元素。然而,“拉动计划”经常被误解为LPS的全部,经常被称为“最后的计划者”。最后计划者“系统”的剩余级别- CAN;将;DID和LEARN没有按照LPS开发商Ballard和Howell最初的意图使用。斗争通常始于准备计划(Make Ready Planning, CAN)。本文是一项为期两年的研究项目的第一个成果,该项目专注于实施CAN;将;做了;了解组织内的LPS水平(X)。它概述了如何将精益项目交付的8个流程和“流程游走”作为一种结构化方法来协同识别约束条件,并将其纳入风险登记册和制定准备计划。这种方法对于识别约束和在项目团队中创建对项目范围的共享理解是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Labour Productivity in Petrochemical Construction and Maintenance Projects Complex Production Systems: Non-Linear and Non-Repetitive Projects Towards Facility Management Participation in Design: A UCSF Case Study Project Delivery Through Lean Principles Across All Disciplnes of Construction in a Developing Country Environment Short Takt Time in Construction – a Practical Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1