An exploratory computational analysis of dual degeneracy in mixed-integer programming

IF 2.6 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE EURO Journal on Computational Optimization Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1007/s13675-020-00130-z
Gerald Gamrath , Timo Berthold , Domenico Salvagnin
{"title":"An exploratory computational analysis of dual degeneracy in mixed-integer programming","authors":"Gerald Gamrath ,&nbsp;Timo Berthold ,&nbsp;Domenico Salvagnin","doi":"10.1007/s13675-020-00130-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dual degeneracy, i.e., the presence of multiple optimal bases to a linear programming (LP) problem, heavily affects the solution process of mixed integer programming (MIP) solvers. Different optimal bases lead to different cuts being generated, different branching decisions being taken and different solutions being found by primal heuristics. Nevertheless, only a few methods have been published that either avoid or exploit dual degeneracy. The aim of the present paper is to conduct a thorough computational study on the presence of dual degeneracy for the instances of well-known public MIP instance collections. How many instances are affected by dual degeneracy? How degenerate are the affected models? How does branching affect degeneracy: Does it increase or decrease by fixing variables? Can we identify different types of degenerate MIPs? As a tool to answer these questions, we introduce a new measure for dual degeneracy: the variable–constraint ratio of the optimal face. It provides an estimate for the likelihood that a basic variable can be pivoted out of the basis. Furthermore, we study how the so-called cloud intervals—the projections of the optimal face of the LP relaxations onto the individual variables—evolve during tree search and the implications for reducing the set of branching candidates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51880,"journal":{"name":"EURO Journal on Computational Optimization","volume":"8 3","pages":"Pages 241-261"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13675-020-00130-z","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EURO Journal on Computational Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2192440621001295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Dual degeneracy, i.e., the presence of multiple optimal bases to a linear programming (LP) problem, heavily affects the solution process of mixed integer programming (MIP) solvers. Different optimal bases lead to different cuts being generated, different branching decisions being taken and different solutions being found by primal heuristics. Nevertheless, only a few methods have been published that either avoid or exploit dual degeneracy. The aim of the present paper is to conduct a thorough computational study on the presence of dual degeneracy for the instances of well-known public MIP instance collections. How many instances are affected by dual degeneracy? How degenerate are the affected models? How does branching affect degeneracy: Does it increase or decrease by fixing variables? Can we identify different types of degenerate MIPs? As a tool to answer these questions, we introduce a new measure for dual degeneracy: the variable–constraint ratio of the optimal face. It provides an estimate for the likelihood that a basic variable can be pivoted out of the basis. Furthermore, we study how the so-called cloud intervals—the projections of the optimal face of the LP relaxations onto the individual variables—evolve during tree search and the implications for reducing the set of branching candidates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合整数规划对偶退化的探索性计算分析
对偶退化,即线性规划(LP)问题存在多个最优基,严重影响混合整数规划(MIP)解的求解过程。不同的最优基础导致产生不同的切割,采取不同的分支决策,并通过原始启发式找到不同的解决方案。然而,只有少数方法已经发表,要么避免或利用对偶简并。本文的目的是对众所周知的公共MIP实例集合实例的对偶退化的存在进行彻底的计算研究。有多少实例受到双重简并的影响?受影响的模型退化到什么程度?分支如何影响简并:它是通过固定变量而增加还是减少?我们能识别不同类型的退化MIPs吗?作为回答这些问题的工具,我们引入了一种新的对偶退化度量:最优面变约束比。它提供了一个估计的可能性,一个基本变量可以从基中枢轴。此外,我们还研究了所谓的云区间——LP松弛的最优面在单个变量上的投影——在树搜索过程中是如何进化的,以及减少分支候选集的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EURO Journal on Computational Optimization
EURO Journal on Computational Optimization OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to contribute to the many areas in which Operations Research and Computer Science are tightly connected with each other. More precisely, the common element in all contributions to this journal is the use of computers for the solution of optimization problems. Both methodological contributions and innovative applications are considered, but validation through convincing computational experiments is desirable. The journal publishes three types of articles (i) research articles, (ii) tutorials, and (iii) surveys. A research article presents original methodological contributions. A tutorial provides an introduction to an advanced topic designed to ease the use of the relevant methodology. A survey provides a wide overview of a given subject by summarizing and organizing research results.
期刊最新文献
Unboxing Tree ensembles for interpretability: A hierarchical visualization tool and a multivariate optimal re-built tree An effective hybrid decomposition approach to solve the network-constrained stochastic unit commitment problem in large-scale power systems Advances in nonlinear optimization and equilibrium problems – Special issue editorial The Marguerite Frank Award for the best EJCO paper 2023 A variable metric proximal stochastic gradient method: An application to classification problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1