Public vs Private Ownership, Board Structure and Fund Manager Turnover

John C. Adams, S. Mansi, Takeshi Nishikawa
{"title":"Public vs Private Ownership, Board Structure and Fund Manager Turnover","authors":"John C. Adams, S. Mansi, Takeshi Nishikawa","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1492846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the relation between organizational structure (public vs private) and managerial turnover in a large sample of U.S. offered mutual funds. Consistent with the hypothesis that publicly traded firms focus more on shorter term performance, we find that public sponsors are more sensitive to prior fund performance when making replacement decisions and experience smaller post turnover performance improvements. Additional testing suggests a higher likelihood of fund manager replacement when mutual funds are team managed and when fund boards more independent. Overall, our results indicate that organizational form plays a pivotal role in the managerial labor market for mutual funds.","PeriodicalId":373523,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Other Corporate Governance: Compensation of Executive & Directors (Topic)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Other Corporate Governance: Compensation of Executive & Directors (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1492846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We examine the relation between organizational structure (public vs private) and managerial turnover in a large sample of U.S. offered mutual funds. Consistent with the hypothesis that publicly traded firms focus more on shorter term performance, we find that public sponsors are more sensitive to prior fund performance when making replacement decisions and experience smaller post turnover performance improvements. Additional testing suggests a higher likelihood of fund manager replacement when mutual funds are team managed and when fund boards more independent. Overall, our results indicate that organizational form plays a pivotal role in the managerial labor market for mutual funds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公有与私有所有权,董事会结构和基金经理更替
我们在美国提供的共同基金的大样本中研究了组织结构(公共与私人)与管理人员流动率之间的关系。与上市公司更关注短期绩效的假设相一致,我们发现公募发起人在做出替换决策时对之前的基金绩效更敏感,并且换手后的绩效改善较小。进一步的测试表明,当共同基金由团队管理、基金董事会更加独立时,更换基金经理的可能性更高。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,组织形式在共同基金的管理劳动力市场中起着关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Matters More in Board Independence? Form or Substance? Powerful CEOs and Stock Price Crash Risk Who's Paying Attention? Measuring Common Ownership and its Impact on Managerial Incentives Three Dilemmas for Creating a Long-term Board Corporate Governance, Ownership and Control: A Review of Recent Scholarly Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1