Main Contents and Problems of the U.S. “Chip Act” and China’s Response in the Context of WTO

Tehong Ye
{"title":"Main Contents and Problems of the U.S. “Chip Act” and China’s Response in the Context of WTO","authors":"Tehong Ye","doi":"10.26689/pbes.v5i6.4456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the rise of unilateral protectionism and the blockage of World Trade Organization (WTO) multilateral trading system reform, the United States (U.S.) provides huge financial support to its semiconductor industry through the “Chip Act.” Besides, the U.S. attempts to improve the competitiveness of its semiconductor industry and dominate the international semiconductor market by setting up a series of “guardrails provisions” to curb the development of “foreign countries of concern,” such as China. Through documentary analysis, the main contents of the “Chip Act” are clarified, and its justiciability and compliance are analyzed from the perspective of WTO rules. In terms of actionability, the “Chip Act” meets the general conditions of subsidies and possesses the traits of specificity but at the same time causes damage to other countries’ industries, thus constituting an actionable subsidy. In terms of compliance, the discriminatory provisions of the “Chip Act” violate the principle of non-discrimination. Accordingly, China should actively respond under the WTO framework by promoting the resolution of the Appellate Body crisis and the reform of the dispute settlement mechanism as well as participating in subsidy reform negotiations and contributing Chinese solutions; China should also take the initiative to apply countervailing rules to the “Chip Act” while improving its own trade remedy system.","PeriodicalId":310426,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26689/pbes.v5i6.4456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rise of unilateral protectionism and the blockage of World Trade Organization (WTO) multilateral trading system reform, the United States (U.S.) provides huge financial support to its semiconductor industry through the “Chip Act.” Besides, the U.S. attempts to improve the competitiveness of its semiconductor industry and dominate the international semiconductor market by setting up a series of “guardrails provisions” to curb the development of “foreign countries of concern,” such as China. Through documentary analysis, the main contents of the “Chip Act” are clarified, and its justiciability and compliance are analyzed from the perspective of WTO rules. In terms of actionability, the “Chip Act” meets the general conditions of subsidies and possesses the traits of specificity but at the same time causes damage to other countries’ industries, thus constituting an actionable subsidy. In terms of compliance, the discriminatory provisions of the “Chip Act” violate the principle of non-discrimination. Accordingly, China should actively respond under the WTO framework by promoting the resolution of the Appellate Body crisis and the reform of the dispute settlement mechanism as well as participating in subsidy reform negotiations and contributing Chinese solutions; China should also take the initiative to apply countervailing rules to the “Chip Act” while improving its own trade remedy system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国“芯片法案”的主要内容、问题及中国在WTO背景下的应对
在单边保护主义抬头、世界贸易组织(WTO)多边贸易体制改革受阻的情况下,美国通过《芯片法案》为本国半导体产业提供巨额资金支持。此外,美国还试图通过制定一系列“护栏条款”来遏制中国等“关注的外国”的发展,从而提高本国半导体产业的竞争力,主导国际半导体市场。通过文献分析,明确了《芯片法案》的主要内容,并从WTO规则的角度对其可诉性和合规性进行了分析。从可诉性上看,《芯片法》符合补贴的一般条件,具有特殊性,但同时对他国产业造成损害,构成可诉补贴。在合规性方面,《芯片法》的歧视性条款违反了非歧视原则。因此,中国应在WTO框架下积极应对,推动解决上诉机构危机和争端解决机制改革,参与补贴改革谈判,贡献中国方案;中国也应在完善自身贸易救济制度的同时,主动对《芯片法》适用反补贴规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research on the Innovative Decisions of Supermarket Private Brands and Designated Manufacturers Research on the Problems and Countermeasures of Monetary Capital Internal Control in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Research on the Impact of Low Carbon Economy on China’s Foreign Trade Generational Dynamics of Innovation Adoption in Chinese Consumer Markets: A Comprehensive Analysis Strategies for China’s Response to and Improvement of Third-Party Funding in International Investment Arbitration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1