Acción colectiva y reconstrucción del parque habitacional en Ciudad de México: aproximaciones a partir del sismo del 19 de septiembre de 2017

Natalia Fernanda Ponce Arancibia
{"title":"Acción colectiva y reconstrucción del parque habitacional en Ciudad de México: aproximaciones a partir del sismo del 19 de septiembre de 2017","authors":"Natalia Fernanda Ponce Arancibia","doi":"10.7440/antipoda45.2021.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The withdrawal of collective processes and the strengthening of the individual sphere correspond to a phenomenon that, at territorial level, is evident in multi-family housing buildings where private and common property coexist. This dichotomous condition determines a constant tension among residents. The September 19, 2017 earthquake in Mexico City marked a turning point in the individualistic dynamics that prevailed within these spaces, leading to the articulation of a collective lawsuit that stressed the state response to care for those affected. In this context, this article proposes a review of the concept of collective action and an analysis of its impact on the modification of institutional structures during reconstruction in Mexico City since the 2017 earthquake. A first stage consisted in the review of hemerographic material and official documents issued between September 2017 and July 2018. Following this, between August 2018 and October 2019, the researcher held in-depth interviews with residents of the Multifamiliar Tlalpan and attended three informative assemblies, as a non-participant observer. The loss of housing constitutes a crisis scenario, but it also strengthens a common identity among those who reside in a given housing context. This identity has the potential to articulate processes of collective action that may stress conventional institutional responses, enabling counter-hegemonic approaches to the benefit of those affected. Based on the observation of a specific urban scalar unit, such as multifamily housing, the article provides a territorialized reading of the new forms of collective articulation that emerge in crisis scenarios; a reading that, based on empirical evidence, is intended to strengthen the theoretical discussion on collective action","PeriodicalId":341210,"journal":{"name":"Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda45.2021.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: The withdrawal of collective processes and the strengthening of the individual sphere correspond to a phenomenon that, at territorial level, is evident in multi-family housing buildings where private and common property coexist. This dichotomous condition determines a constant tension among residents. The September 19, 2017 earthquake in Mexico City marked a turning point in the individualistic dynamics that prevailed within these spaces, leading to the articulation of a collective lawsuit that stressed the state response to care for those affected. In this context, this article proposes a review of the concept of collective action and an analysis of its impact on the modification of institutional structures during reconstruction in Mexico City since the 2017 earthquake. A first stage consisted in the review of hemerographic material and official documents issued between September 2017 and July 2018. Following this, between August 2018 and October 2019, the researcher held in-depth interviews with residents of the Multifamiliar Tlalpan and attended three informative assemblies, as a non-participant observer. The loss of housing constitutes a crisis scenario, but it also strengthens a common identity among those who reside in a given housing context. This identity has the potential to articulate processes of collective action that may stress conventional institutional responses, enabling counter-hegemonic approaches to the benefit of those affected. Based on the observation of a specific urban scalar unit, such as multifamily housing, the article provides a territorialized reading of the new forms of collective articulation that emerge in crisis scenarios; a reading that, based on empirical evidence, is intended to strengthen the theoretical discussion on collective action
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥城住房公园的集体行动和重建:来自2017年9月19日地震的方法
集体进程的退出和个人领域的加强与一种现象相对应,在领土一级,在私有财产和共同财产并存的多户住宅建筑中很明显。这种二分法决定了居民之间持续的紧张关系。2017年9月19日发生在墨西哥城的地震标志着这些空间中盛行的个人主义动态的转折点,导致集体诉讼的表达,强调国家对受影响者的照顾。在此背景下,本文提出了对集体行动概念的回顾,并分析了自2017年地震以来墨西哥城重建过程中集体行动对制度结构修改的影响。第一阶段包括审查2017年9月至2018年7月期间发布的气象资料和官方文件。在此之后,在2018年8月至2019年10月期间,研究人员对Multifamiliar Tlalpan的居民进行了深入访谈,并作为非参与者观察员参加了三次信息大会。住房的丧失构成了一种危机情景,但它也加强了居住在特定住房环境中的人们的共同身份。这种认同有可能阐明集体行动的过程,这些过程可能强调传统的制度反应,使反霸权的方法能够造福于受影响的人。基于对特定城市标量单元(如多户住宅)的观察,本文对危机场景中出现的集体表达的新形式进行了地域性解读;一篇基于经验证据的阅读,旨在加强对集体行动的理论讨论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflections for an Activist Archaeology in Contemporary Latin America The Central Role of Educational Approaches in Collaborative Archaeology with Traditional Communities in the Brazilian Amazon (2017-2022) Arqueología pública y cartografías participativas: institucionalidad y resignificaciones locales del patrimonio arqueológico del Sígsig, Ecuador (2022-2024) Collaborative Methodologies in Archaeology: Theoretical Reflections and Practical Advances on Heritage, Its Research, and Dissemination Reflexiones sobre metodologías colaborativas: proyecto de investigación para el retorno de los ancestros a territorio atacameño lickanantay (2021-2024)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1