Collaborative Methodologies in Archaeology: Theoretical Reflections and Practical Advances on Heritage, Its Research, and Dissemination

María Fernanda Ugalde, Sonia Archila
{"title":"Collaborative Methodologies in Archaeology: Theoretical Reflections and Practical Advances on Heritage, Its Research, and Dissemination","authors":"María Fernanda Ugalde, Sonia Archila","doi":"10.7440/antipoda56.2024.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Centered around the questions of “whose” and “for whom” heritage is, this article explores various approaches in South America aimed at achieving a public archaeology that is inclusive and beneficial to communities. While the reflections and most case studies primarily focus on indigenous societies, specific efforts to develop collaborative methodologies that include other groups or collectives are also discussed. To provide a comprehensive view, a general review of relevant literature from different parts of the continent has been conducted, synthesizing it to present the state of the art on collaborative methodologies in the Americas, with a focus on South America. The core concepts addressed are heritage and community, their interrelationship, and the diverse ways their connection is crucial today, particularly in terms of collaborative methodologies in various research projects. The discussion highlights how the interpretation and presentation of the past become significant aspects when transitioning from theory to the practice of collaborations. After presenting several previously published examples and the articles comprising this dossier, the article concludes that significant advances have been made in the last decades in developing collaborative methodologies in archaeology. This progress marks a positive path toward the pluralization of the discipline. As an original contribution, the article offers a comparative reflection on collaborative work with communities in museums in Europe and the Americas, evaluating approaches and advancements. It concludes that researchers in the Americas have an advantage: working with materials that are closely connected to the groups that consider them their heritage, or considering themselves the heirs, allows for a more intimate and legitimate approach.","PeriodicalId":341210,"journal":{"name":"Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología","volume":" 44","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda56.2024.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Centered around the questions of “whose” and “for whom” heritage is, this article explores various approaches in South America aimed at achieving a public archaeology that is inclusive and beneficial to communities. While the reflections and most case studies primarily focus on indigenous societies, specific efforts to develop collaborative methodologies that include other groups or collectives are also discussed. To provide a comprehensive view, a general review of relevant literature from different parts of the continent has been conducted, synthesizing it to present the state of the art on collaborative methodologies in the Americas, with a focus on South America. The core concepts addressed are heritage and community, their interrelationship, and the diverse ways their connection is crucial today, particularly in terms of collaborative methodologies in various research projects. The discussion highlights how the interpretation and presentation of the past become significant aspects when transitioning from theory to the practice of collaborations. After presenting several previously published examples and the articles comprising this dossier, the article concludes that significant advances have been made in the last decades in developing collaborative methodologies in archaeology. This progress marks a positive path toward the pluralization of the discipline. As an original contribution, the article offers a comparative reflection on collaborative work with communities in museums in Europe and the Americas, evaluating approaches and advancements. It concludes that researchers in the Americas have an advantage: working with materials that are closely connected to the groups that consider them their heritage, or considering themselves the heirs, allows for a more intimate and legitimate approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考古学中的合作方法论:遗产、遗产研究和遗产传播的理论思考与实践进展
本文围绕遗产是 "谁的 "和 "为谁 "的问题,探讨了南美洲的各种方法,旨在实现包容和有益于社区的公共考古。虽然思考和大多数案例研究主要集中在土著社会,但也讨论了为发展包括其他群体或集体在内的合作方法所做的具体努力。为了提供一个全面的视角,我们对美洲大陆不同地区的相关文献进行了综述,以南美洲为重点,介绍了美洲合作方法的最新进展。讨论的核心概念是遗产和社区,它们之间的相互关系,以及它们之间的联系在当今至关重要的各种方式,特别是在各种研究项目的合作方法方面。讨论强调了在从理论过渡到合作实践时,对过去的解释和介绍如何成为重要的方面。在介绍了以前发表的几个例子和构成本档案的文章之后,文章得出结论认为,过去几十年来,在开发考古学合作方法方面取得了重大进展。这一进步标志着考古学走向多元化的积极道路。作为一项原创性贡献,文章对欧洲和美洲博物馆与社区的合作工作进行了比较反思,评估了合作方法和进展。文章的结论是,美洲的研究人员有一个优势:他们的研究材料与那些认为这些材料是其遗产或认为自己是遗产继承人的群体密切相关,因此可以采用更加亲近和合法的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflections for an Activist Archaeology in Contemporary Latin America The Central Role of Educational Approaches in Collaborative Archaeology with Traditional Communities in the Brazilian Amazon (2017-2022) Arqueología pública y cartografías participativas: institucionalidad y resignificaciones locales del patrimonio arqueológico del Sígsig, Ecuador (2022-2024) Collaborative Methodologies in Archaeology: Theoretical Reflections and Practical Advances on Heritage, Its Research, and Dissemination Reflexiones sobre metodologías colaborativas: proyecto de investigación para el retorno de los ancestros a territorio atacameño lickanantay (2021-2024)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1