Blended Learning as a Transformative Educational Approach for Qualitative Health Research

Anisha Arora, K. Rice, A. Adams
{"title":"Blended Learning as a Transformative Educational Approach for Qualitative Health Research","authors":"Anisha Arora, K. Rice, A. Adams","doi":"10.33137/utjph.v3i1.37639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Qualitative health research seeks to elucidate the realities of context, reveal the complexities of behaviour, probe the intersecting and multiple determinants of health at individual, community and institutional levels, and capture the dynamics of health care provision from the perspectives of patients, providers, and systems. Traditionally, in our Family Medicine Department at McGill University, graduate students are trained in qualitative health research in the context of a synchronous in-person classroom. Amidst the pandemic, synchronous learning shifted to online modalities, obliging rapid innovation in pedagogic practice. Careful consideration and creation of new online modalities for engaged student learning took place, and when implemented, instructor and student feedback was solicited on whether or how they were effective. Together, co-instructors and the teaching assistant for the course reflected on the challenges and opportunities of teaching qualitative research in an online environment, and how online modalities might be usefully blended with in-person learning. \nReflections: Three arguments supporting a blended approach were identified. Firstly, blending online and in-person approaches enables learners to tailor their educational experience to their needs and objectives, and to some extent, control the content, sequence, pace, and time of their learning. Secondly, blended learning empowers educators by offering tools and systems to monitor learner progress, while encouraging creativity in conveying content that may be complicated and dense (e.g., providing online workshops about managing qualitative data analysis via readily accessible online software). Lastly, blended learning has the potential to transform graduate training for the better by facilitating innovative modes of communication (e.g., use of chat function in videoconferencing software and online discussion boards as modalities for discussion that engage students who may not otherwise speak), enabling students to contextualize their projects (e.g., implementation of an observational data collection assignment, unique to each student based on where they live and their interests), while better balancing their academic, professional, and personal lives. \nDiscussion: To develop a thorough understanding of qualitative health research, key concepts can be taught and practiced through a combination of in-person and online synchronous and asynchronous learning modalities. In doing so, educators can take advantage of innovative learning technologies, while also maintaining the humanistic touch necessary for education to be meaningful and effective. Importantly, from our experiences we note that blended learning approaches are viable and pertinent in the context of qualitative health research, an idea that was previously dismissed due to perceptions that qualitative inquiry and learning requires solely in-person, hands-on, engagement. ","PeriodicalId":265882,"journal":{"name":"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/utjph.v3i1.37639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Qualitative health research seeks to elucidate the realities of context, reveal the complexities of behaviour, probe the intersecting and multiple determinants of health at individual, community and institutional levels, and capture the dynamics of health care provision from the perspectives of patients, providers, and systems. Traditionally, in our Family Medicine Department at McGill University, graduate students are trained in qualitative health research in the context of a synchronous in-person classroom. Amidst the pandemic, synchronous learning shifted to online modalities, obliging rapid innovation in pedagogic practice. Careful consideration and creation of new online modalities for engaged student learning took place, and when implemented, instructor and student feedback was solicited on whether or how they were effective. Together, co-instructors and the teaching assistant for the course reflected on the challenges and opportunities of teaching qualitative research in an online environment, and how online modalities might be usefully blended with in-person learning. Reflections: Three arguments supporting a blended approach were identified. Firstly, blending online and in-person approaches enables learners to tailor their educational experience to their needs and objectives, and to some extent, control the content, sequence, pace, and time of their learning. Secondly, blended learning empowers educators by offering tools and systems to monitor learner progress, while encouraging creativity in conveying content that may be complicated and dense (e.g., providing online workshops about managing qualitative data analysis via readily accessible online software). Lastly, blended learning has the potential to transform graduate training for the better by facilitating innovative modes of communication (e.g., use of chat function in videoconferencing software and online discussion boards as modalities for discussion that engage students who may not otherwise speak), enabling students to contextualize their projects (e.g., implementation of an observational data collection assignment, unique to each student based on where they live and their interests), while better balancing their academic, professional, and personal lives. Discussion: To develop a thorough understanding of qualitative health research, key concepts can be taught and practiced through a combination of in-person and online synchronous and asynchronous learning modalities. In doing so, educators can take advantage of innovative learning technologies, while also maintaining the humanistic touch necessary for education to be meaningful and effective. Importantly, from our experiences we note that blended learning approaches are viable and pertinent in the context of qualitative health research, an idea that was previously dismissed due to perceptions that qualitative inquiry and learning requires solely in-person, hands-on, engagement. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合学习作为定性健康研究的一种变革性教育方法
背景:定性卫生研究旨在阐明背景的现实,揭示行为的复杂性,探索个人、社区和机构层面健康的交叉和多重决定因素,并从患者、提供者和系统的角度捕捉卫生保健提供的动态。传统上,在麦吉尔大学家庭医学系,研究生在同步的面对面课堂上接受定性健康研究的培训。在大流行期间,同步学习转向在线模式,迫使教学实践迅速创新。我们仔细考虑并创造了新的在线模式,让学生参与学习。实施后,我们征求了教师和学生对这些模式是否有效或如何有效的反馈。该课程的共同讲师和助教一起思考了在线环境下教学定性研究的挑战和机遇,以及如何将在线模式与面对面学习有效地结合起来。反思:确定了支持混合方法的三个论点。首先,在线和面对面的结合使学习者能够根据自己的需要和目标定制自己的教育体验,并在一定程度上控制学习的内容、顺序、速度和时间。其次,混合式学习通过提供工具和系统来监控学习者的进步,同时鼓励在传达可能复杂和密集的内容时的创造力,从而赋予教育工作者权力(例如,提供关于通过易于访问的在线软件管理定性数据分析的在线研讨会)。最后,混合式学习有潜力通过促进创新的交流模式(例如,在视频会议软件和在线讨论板中使用聊天功能,作为与可能不发言的学生进行讨论的模式),使学生能够将他们的项目情境化(例如,实施观察数据收集任务,根据每个学生的居住地和兴趣,每个学生都是独一无二的),从而更好地改变研究生培训。同时更好地平衡学业、职业和个人生活。讨论:为了深入了解定性卫生研究,可以通过面对面和在线同步和异步学习模式的结合来教授和实践关键概念。在这样做的过程中,教育工作者可以利用创新的学习技术,同时保持教育有意义和有效所必需的人文主义色彩。重要的是,根据我们的经验,我们注意到混合学习方法在定性健康研究的背景下是可行和相关的,这一想法以前被忽视,因为人们认为定性调查和学习只需要亲自动手参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of School-Based Physical Activity Interventions on Body Mass Index Among ‎Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Randomised Trials Enhancing the care experiences of Black women along the breast cancer journey: Meaningfully engaging breast cancer survivors to co-create a targeted, culturally relevant resource hub Impact of Medical Legal Partnerships: A Scoping Review Exploring Experiences with Social Inclusion, Food Security and Housing Among People Living with HIV: A Qualitative Analysis Rethinking public health pedagogy: lessons learned and pertinent questions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1