{"title":"Amazon’s Competition Investigation in India: A Case for Expansion of Investigation and Grant of Interim Relief","authors":"Madhavi Singh","doi":"10.55496/zipl6280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last few years, associations of domestic retailers have become vociferous opponents of Amazon’s practices in India. In response to complaints of anti-competitive conduct, the Competition Commission of India has initiated an investigation into Amazon’s anti-competitive vertical agreements in online smartphone retail. Against this backdrop, Reuters published a series of investigative reports which indicate that Amazon used internal data of third-party sellers and engaged in preferential treatment of private labels and preferred sellers. The Reuters reports join a series of other reports and studies which reveal that such conduct is pervasive across product categories. In light of this information, this paper makes two broad arguments. First, the paper argues that the scope of the competition investigation in India should be broadened beyond smartphones. The investigation should be reoriented to focus on the relationship between Amazon and its preferred sellers or retailers more broadly, rather than bifurcating the investigation along the lines of separate product categories. Second, the paper argues that the publicly-available information is sufficient to satisfy the legal test for passing an interim order. Such an interim order should prohibit Amazon from acting in the dual capacity of marketplace and seller. The necessity of the interim order has been highlighted through reference to the potentially irreparable and unquantifiable harm done to competition and consumers and the protracted nature of competition proceedings which might render the final order redundant.","PeriodicalId":106680,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Law and Technology","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Law and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55496/zipl6280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the last few years, associations of domestic retailers have become vociferous opponents of Amazon’s practices in India. In response to complaints of anti-competitive conduct, the Competition Commission of India has initiated an investigation into Amazon’s anti-competitive vertical agreements in online smartphone retail. Against this backdrop, Reuters published a series of investigative reports which indicate that Amazon used internal data of third-party sellers and engaged in preferential treatment of private labels and preferred sellers. The Reuters reports join a series of other reports and studies which reveal that such conduct is pervasive across product categories. In light of this information, this paper makes two broad arguments. First, the paper argues that the scope of the competition investigation in India should be broadened beyond smartphones. The investigation should be reoriented to focus on the relationship between Amazon and its preferred sellers or retailers more broadly, rather than bifurcating the investigation along the lines of separate product categories. Second, the paper argues that the publicly-available information is sufficient to satisfy the legal test for passing an interim order. Such an interim order should prohibit Amazon from acting in the dual capacity of marketplace and seller. The necessity of the interim order has been highlighted through reference to the potentially irreparable and unquantifiable harm done to competition and consumers and the protracted nature of competition proceedings which might render the final order redundant.
在过去几年里,印度国内零售商协会已经成为亚马逊在印度做法的强烈反对者。作为对亚马逊反竞争行为投诉的回应,印度竞争委员会(Competition Commission of India)已对亚马逊在在线智能手机零售领域的反竞争垂直协议展开调查。在此背景下,路透社发表了一系列调查报告,指出亚马逊利用第三方卖家的内部数据,对自有品牌和优先卖家进行优惠待遇。路透社的报告和其他一系列报告和研究表明,这种行为在各个产品类别中都很普遍。根据这些信息,本文提出了两大论点。首先,该论文认为,印度竞争调查的范围应该扩大到智能手机之外。调查应该重新定位,更广泛地关注亚马逊与其首选卖家或零售商之间的关系,而不是沿着单独的产品类别进行调查。其次,本文认为公开信息足以满足通过临时命令的法律检验。这样的临时命令应该禁止亚马逊以市场和卖家的双重身份行事。通过提到对竞争和消费者可能造成的无法弥补和无法量化的损害以及竞争程序的旷日持久的性质可能使最终命令变得多余,强调了临时命令的必要性。