Cost and effectiveness integration

J. Sackett
{"title":"Cost and effectiveness integration","authors":"J. Sackett","doi":"10.1109/NAECON.1994.332904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most difficult problems in a Cost and Operational Effectiveness Analysis (COEA) is the combination of the cost and effectiveness data and the corresponding presentation of this information to the decision maker in an integrated manner that allows him/her to select the best alternative from the competing weapons systems. The combination of cost and effectiveness is necessary because the wartime field commander wants to maximize weapon system effectiveness regardless of fiscal costs, while the peacetime financial manager wants to minimize costs while providing acceptable weapon system effectiveness. The difficulty of combining cost and effectiveness arises because the operational effectiveness analysis usually presents the performance of each alternative with respect to several measures of effectiveness (MOE). When examining this data, it is unusual to have a clear winner among the competing alternatives. And when the cost data is considered with the effectiveness data, the problem of selecting the \"best\" alternative is further complicated. However, unless the COEA is able to integrate the cost and effectiveness data into a coherent product, the analysis has not helped the decision maker solve his/her problem-selecting the preferred alternative. There are several potential methods that can be used to integrate the cost and effectiveness data for presentation to decision makers. This paper briefly discusses each method, provides an example of each method, and identifies its associated advantages and disadvantages.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":281754,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON'94)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON'94)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1994.332904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

One of the most difficult problems in a Cost and Operational Effectiveness Analysis (COEA) is the combination of the cost and effectiveness data and the corresponding presentation of this information to the decision maker in an integrated manner that allows him/her to select the best alternative from the competing weapons systems. The combination of cost and effectiveness is necessary because the wartime field commander wants to maximize weapon system effectiveness regardless of fiscal costs, while the peacetime financial manager wants to minimize costs while providing acceptable weapon system effectiveness. The difficulty of combining cost and effectiveness arises because the operational effectiveness analysis usually presents the performance of each alternative with respect to several measures of effectiveness (MOE). When examining this data, it is unusual to have a clear winner among the competing alternatives. And when the cost data is considered with the effectiveness data, the problem of selecting the "best" alternative is further complicated. However, unless the COEA is able to integrate the cost and effectiveness data into a coherent product, the analysis has not helped the decision maker solve his/her problem-selecting the preferred alternative. There are several potential methods that can be used to integrate the cost and effectiveness data for presentation to decision makers. This paper briefly discusses each method, provides an example of each method, and identifies its associated advantages and disadvantages.<>
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成本与效益整合
成本和作战效能分析(COEA)中最困难的问题之一是将成本和效能数据结合起来,并以综合方式将这些信息相应呈现给决策者,使他/她能够从竞争武器系统中选择最佳方案。成本和有效性的结合是必要的,因为战时战场指挥官希望在不考虑财政成本的情况下最大化武器系统的有效性,而和平时期的财务经理则希望在提供可接受的武器系统有效性的同时最小化成本。将成本和有效性结合起来的困难在于,业务有效性分析通常根据几种有效性度量(MOE)来呈现每种备选方案的性能。在研究这些数据时,在竞争的备选方案中找到一个明显的赢家是不寻常的。而当成本数据与有效性数据同时考虑时,选择“最佳”方案的问题就更加复杂了。然而,除非COEA能够将成本和有效性数据集成到一个连贯的产品中,否则分析并不能帮助决策者解决他/她的问题——选择首选的替代方案。有几种潜在的方法可用于集成成本和有效性数据,以便向决策者展示。本文简要地讨论了每种方法,提供了每种方法的一个例子,并确定了其相关的优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The application of difference method to dim point target detection in infrared images Computer emulator applications Automatic code generation for aerodynamic/math models Automated validation of operational flight programs (OFPs) and flight training simulators A CF-based algorithm for moving dot target detection in FLIR image sequence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1