The Difference in Spectral Power Density in Sleep Electroencephalography According to the Estimation of Total Sleep Time

Jun-Mu Heo, Seo-Eun Cho, Seungche Kang
{"title":"The Difference in Spectral Power Density in Sleep Electroencephalography According to the Estimation of Total Sleep Time","authors":"Jun-Mu Heo, Seo-Eun Cho, Seungche Kang","doi":"10.33069/cim.2023.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The discrepancy between self-reported subjective sleep time and objective sleep time varies from person to person, and the mechanism that can explain this discrepancy is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the difference in the spectral power of sleep electroencephalography (EEG) according to the estimation of total sleep time (TST).Methods: Of the 4,080 participants in the Sleep Heart Health Study, 2,363 participants with complete data from polysomnography, morning sleep survey, and spectral power of sleep EEG were included in the analysis. The participants were classified as normo-estimators (estimation of TST <±60 min), under-estimators (underestimation of TST ≤60 min), or over-estimators (overestimation of TST ≥60 min). A fast Fourier transformation was used to calculate the EEG power spectrum for total sleep duration within contiguous 30-s epochs of sleep. The sleep EEG spectral power was compared among the groups after adjusting for potential confounding factors, such as age, sex, proportion of participants with insomnia, apnea-hypopnea index, and TST.Results: Of the 2,363 participants, 1,507 (63.8%), 412 (17.4%), and 444 (18.8%) were assigned to the normo-, under-, and over-estimator groups, respectively. The power spectra during total sleep differed significantly among the groups in the delta (p=0.008) and theta bands (p=0.017) after controlling for potential confounders.Conclusion: Higher delta and theta powers were found in the under-estimators than in the over-estimators. This study suggests that differences exist in the microstructures of polysomnography-derived sleep EEG between these two groups. This study suggests that differences exist in the microstructures of polysomnography-derived sleep EEG based on differences in sleep time estimation.","PeriodicalId":277997,"journal":{"name":"Chronobiology in Medicine","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronobiology in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33069/cim.2023.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The discrepancy between self-reported subjective sleep time and objective sleep time varies from person to person, and the mechanism that can explain this discrepancy is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the difference in the spectral power of sleep electroencephalography (EEG) according to the estimation of total sleep time (TST).Methods: Of the 4,080 participants in the Sleep Heart Health Study, 2,363 participants with complete data from polysomnography, morning sleep survey, and spectral power of sleep EEG were included in the analysis. The participants were classified as normo-estimators (estimation of TST <±60 min), under-estimators (underestimation of TST ≤60 min), or over-estimators (overestimation of TST ≥60 min). A fast Fourier transformation was used to calculate the EEG power spectrum for total sleep duration within contiguous 30-s epochs of sleep. The sleep EEG spectral power was compared among the groups after adjusting for potential confounding factors, such as age, sex, proportion of participants with insomnia, apnea-hypopnea index, and TST.Results: Of the 2,363 participants, 1,507 (63.8%), 412 (17.4%), and 444 (18.8%) were assigned to the normo-, under-, and over-estimator groups, respectively. The power spectra during total sleep differed significantly among the groups in the delta (p=0.008) and theta bands (p=0.017) after controlling for potential confounders.Conclusion: Higher delta and theta powers were found in the under-estimators than in the over-estimators. This study suggests that differences exist in the microstructures of polysomnography-derived sleep EEG between these two groups. This study suggests that differences exist in the microstructures of polysomnography-derived sleep EEG based on differences in sleep time estimation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于睡眠总时间估算的睡眠脑电图频谱功率密度差异
目的:自我报告主观睡眠时间与客观睡眠时间的差异因人而异,解释这种差异的机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨睡眠总时间(TST)估算在睡眠脑电图(EEG)频谱功率上的差异。方法:选取4,080名睡眠心脏健康研究对象,其中2,363名具有完整的多导睡眠图、晨睡调查和睡眠脑电图频谱功率数据的参与者进行分析。参与者被分为正态估计者(TST <±60 min的估计)、过估者(TST≤60 min的估计)和过估者(TST≥60 min的估计)。采用快速傅立叶变换计算连续30s睡眠时段内总睡眠时间的脑电功率谱。在调整了年龄、性别、失眠症患者比例、呼吸暂停低通气指数和TST等潜在混杂因素后,比较各组睡眠脑电图频谱功率。结果:在2363名参与者中,分别有1507人(63.8%)、412人(17.4%)和444人(18.8%)被分配到正常、低估计和高估计组。在控制了潜在的混杂因素后,全睡眠期间的功率谱在δ波段(p=0.008)和θ波段(p=0.017)上存在显著差异。结论:低估计者的δ和θ幂值高于高估计者。本研究提示两组在多导睡眠图衍生睡眠脑电图的微观结构上存在差异。本研究表明,睡眠时间估计的差异导致多导睡眠图衍生睡眠脑电图的微观结构存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
No Light at Night and Bright Light in the Morning Combined Influence of Fluctuations in the Local Atmosphere Conditions and Space Weather on the Chronoperiodic Systems in Patients With Cardiovascular Pathology Incidence of Restless Legs Syndrome in Pakistan and Its Relationship With Depression, Gender, and Age: A Cross-Sectional Study Impacts of Blue Light Exposure From Electronic Devices on Circadian Rhythm and Sleep Disruption in Adolescent and Young Adult Students The Effect of Rocking Bed on Mood and Attention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1