T-545/11: Understanding the Aarhus Emissions Rule

G. Garçon
{"title":"T-545/11: Understanding the Aarhus Emissions Rule","authors":"G. Garçon","doi":"10.21552/ICRL/2019/1/8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The judgment issued by the General Court of the European Union (GC) in Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v Commission [2018] ECLI:EU:T:2018,817, T-545/11 RENV, marks the end of proceedings at EU level that were already initiated in 2011. Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and PAN Europe sought access to certain information submitted by glyphosate manufacturers in the regulatory procedure for the initial EU approval of that herbicidal active substance. Following appeal proceedings and a reference back for a new assessment, the GC finds that documents set up in the active substance approval procedure do not contain information related to emissions into the environment. The GC confirms that the European Commission correctly rejected the access to information request as thiswas needed to protect the confidentiality of commercial and industrial information.","PeriodicalId":375592,"journal":{"name":"International Chemical Regulatory and Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Chemical Regulatory and Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/ICRL/2019/1/8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The judgment issued by the General Court of the European Union (GC) in Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v Commission [2018] ECLI:EU:T:2018,817, T-545/11 RENV, marks the end of proceedings at EU level that were already initiated in 2011. Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and PAN Europe sought access to certain information submitted by glyphosate manufacturers in the regulatory procedure for the initial EU approval of that herbicidal active substance. Following appeal proceedings and a reference back for a new assessment, the GC finds that documents set up in the active substance approval procedure do not contain information related to emissions into the environment. The GC confirms that the European Commission correctly rejected the access to information request as thiswas needed to protect the confidentiality of commercial and industrial information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
T-545/11:了解奥胡斯排放规则
欧盟普通法院(GC)在荷兰绿色和平组织(Stichting Greenpeace)和欧洲农药行动网络(PAN Europe)诉委员会[2018]ECLI:EU:T:2018,817, T-545/11 RENV案中做出的判决标志着2011年启动的欧盟层面诉讼程序的结束。荷兰绿色和平组织和PAN欧洲寻求获得草甘膦制造商在欧盟最初批准该除草活性物质的监管程序中提交的某些信息。经过上诉程序和重新评估的参考,GC发现在原料药批准程序中建立的文件不包含与排放到环境中的相关信息。GC确认,欧盟委员会正确地拒绝了获取信息的请求,因为这是保护商业和工业信息机密所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
General Court: Further Clarification on SVHC Status of Bisphenol A Administrative Precedent and the Application of the REACH Regulation - 10 Years of the ECHA Board of Appeal The Authorisation Scheme for Biocidal Products in Switzerland The SCIP Database under Directive (EU) 2018/851 Legal Requirements of Korean Biocide Regulation (K-BPR) and Korean REACH (K-REACH)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1