Reforming International Financial Governance

Ross P. Buckley
{"title":"Reforming International Financial Governance","authors":"Ross P. Buckley","doi":"10.4324/9780203116050-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper outlines the contemporary challenges for International Monetary Fund (IMF) reform. The chapter argues that market principles and disciplines have been abrogated systematically by IMF policy makers whenever the unimpeded operation of markets has failed to deliver profits to the international banks and the elites in the developing countries. In this sense, the IMF should be understood as behaving most consistently not in its commitment to the allocative efficiency of markets, but rather in its commitment to furthering the interests of key groups of economic and political elites. One of the principal challenges in reforming the IMF and the World Bank is therefore to embed, not to re-embed, important market principles and practices; specifically, to let the market allocate losses among borrowers and lenders when loans go sour – a market discipline that has been notably absent from our system of global financial governance for several decades at least. The paper proposes a number of reforms of the IMF which would increase its legitimacy and representativeness.","PeriodicalId":165404,"journal":{"name":"International Institutions: Politics of International Institutions & Global Governance eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Institutions: Politics of International Institutions & Global Governance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203116050-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper outlines the contemporary challenges for International Monetary Fund (IMF) reform. The chapter argues that market principles and disciplines have been abrogated systematically by IMF policy makers whenever the unimpeded operation of markets has failed to deliver profits to the international banks and the elites in the developing countries. In this sense, the IMF should be understood as behaving most consistently not in its commitment to the allocative efficiency of markets, but rather in its commitment to furthering the interests of key groups of economic and political elites. One of the principal challenges in reforming the IMF and the World Bank is therefore to embed, not to re-embed, important market principles and practices; specifically, to let the market allocate losses among borrowers and lenders when loans go sour – a market discipline that has been notably absent from our system of global financial governance for several decades at least. The paper proposes a number of reforms of the IMF which would increase its legitimacy and representativeness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改革国际金融治理
本文概述了当前国际货币基金组织(IMF)改革面临的挑战。本章认为,只要畅通无阻的市场运作未能给国际银行和发展中国家的精英带来利润,市场原则和纪律就会被IMF决策者系统地废除。从这个意义上讲,IMF最一贯的行为应该被理解为,不是致力于提高市场的配置效率,而是致力于促进关键经济和政治精英群体的利益。因此,改革国际货币基金组织和世界银行的主要挑战之一,是嵌入(而不是重新嵌入)重要的市场原则和实践;具体来说,当贷款出现问题时,让市场在借款人和贷款人之间分配损失——至少几十年来,我们的全球金融治理体系明显缺乏这种市场纪律。本文提出了若干改革国际货币基金组织,以增加其合法性和代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank Comments on First Draft of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), 4th Periodic Report for Ireland 2020 Governing AI Putting Global Governance in its Place Multiple Social Credit Systems in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1