Comparison of contrast ratio of two ceramics in two different thicknesses

Porak Sethakamnerd, C. Leevailoj
{"title":"Comparison of contrast ratio of two ceramics in two different thicknesses","authors":"Porak Sethakamnerd, C. Leevailoj","doi":"10.1109/TICST.2015.7369348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare and evaluate the influence of material type and thickness on contrast ratio. Materials and Methods : A total of 36 disc-shaped specimens (15 mm diameter × 0.5 and 1.0 mm thicknesses) were fabricated from IPS e.max Press (n=12), Lava Plus (n=12), Lava Plus + Lava Ceram shade MO W1 (n=12). Contrast ratio was analyzed with two way ANOVA (P<;.05). Results: Contrast ratio of IPS e.max Press at 0.5 and 1.0 mm showed highest value (73.27 ± 4.37 and 87.30 ± 0.58) when compared to Lava Plus + Lava Ceram and Lava Plus groups. Higher contrast ratio significantly related to thicker material. Conclusion: Ceramic type and thickness had significant effect on contrast ratio. Contrast ratio increase as thickness increase.","PeriodicalId":251893,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Science and Technology (TICST)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Science and Technology (TICST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TICST.2015.7369348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To compare and evaluate the influence of material type and thickness on contrast ratio. Materials and Methods : A total of 36 disc-shaped specimens (15 mm diameter × 0.5 and 1.0 mm thicknesses) were fabricated from IPS e.max Press (n=12), Lava Plus (n=12), Lava Plus + Lava Ceram shade MO W1 (n=12). Contrast ratio was analyzed with two way ANOVA (P<;.05). Results: Contrast ratio of IPS e.max Press at 0.5 and 1.0 mm showed highest value (73.27 ± 4.37 and 87.30 ± 0.58) when compared to Lava Plus + Lava Ceram and Lava Plus groups. Higher contrast ratio significantly related to thicker material. Conclusion: Ceramic type and thickness had significant effect on contrast ratio. Contrast ratio increase as thickness increase.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种不同厚度陶瓷的对比度比较
目的:比较评价材料类型和厚度对对比度的影响。材料与方法:采用IPS e.max Press (n=12)、Lava Plus (n=12)、Lava Plus + Lava Ceram shade MO W1 (n=12)共制作36个圆盘状标本(直径15mm × 0.5和1.0 mm厚度)。对比分析采用双因素方差分析(P<; 0.05)。结果:与Lava Plus + Lava Ceram和Lava Plus组相比,IPS e.max Press在0.5和1.0 mm处的对比度最高,分别为73.27±4.37和87.30±0.58。对比度越高,材料越厚。结论:陶瓷类型和厚度对对比度有显著影响。对比度随着厚度的增加而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute toxicity of leaf extracts from sphagneticola trilobata (L.) pruski in rats Language tweet characteristics of Indonesian citizens A model for the estimation of cloud cover from satellite data A method to estimate distribution of directional reflection using a geostationary satellite Antidiabetic property of seed extract from antidesma bunius (L.) spreng in diabetic rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1