They Don't Do it Often, But They Do it Well: Exploring the Relationship between Applicant Mental Abilities and Faking

J. Levashina, F. Morgeson, M. Campion
{"title":"They Don't Do it Often, But They Do it Well: Exploring the Relationship between Applicant Mental Abilities and Faking","authors":"J. Levashina, F. Morgeson, M. Campion","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00469.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite its scientific and practical importance, relatively few studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between job applicant mental abilities and faking. Some studies suggest that more intelligent people fake less because they do not have to. Other studies suggest that more intelligent people fake more because they have increased capacity to fake. Based on a model of faking likelihood, we predicted that job candidates with a high level of mental abilities would be less likely to fake a biodata measure. However, for candidates who did exhibit faking on the biodata measure, we expected there would be a strong positive relationship between mental abilities and faking, because mental abilities increase their capacity to fake. We found considerable support for hypotheses on a large sample of job candidates (N=17,368), using the bogus item technique to detect faking.","PeriodicalId":259932,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: International Journal of Selection & Assessment","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: International Journal of Selection & Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00469.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

Despite its scientific and practical importance, relatively few studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between job applicant mental abilities and faking. Some studies suggest that more intelligent people fake less because they do not have to. Other studies suggest that more intelligent people fake more because they have increased capacity to fake. Based on a model of faking likelihood, we predicted that job candidates with a high level of mental abilities would be less likely to fake a biodata measure. However, for candidates who did exhibit faking on the biodata measure, we expected there would be a strong positive relationship between mental abilities and faking, because mental abilities increase their capacity to fake. We found considerable support for hypotheses on a large sample of job candidates (N=17,368), using the bogus item technique to detect faking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
他们不经常做,但他们做得很好:探索申请人心理能力与伪装之间的关系
尽管它具有科学和实际意义,但相对较少的研究调查了求职者的心理能力和伪装之间的关系。一些研究表明,越聪明的人撒谎越少,因为他们不需要这么做。其他研究表明,越聪明的人说谎越多,因为他们说谎的能力更强。基于造假可能性模型,我们预测,智力水平高的求职者不太可能在生物数据测试中造假。然而,对于那些在生物数据测试中确实表现出造假的候选人,我们预计心理能力和造假之间会有很强的正相关,因为心理能力会增加他们造假的能力。我们在大量的求职者样本(N=17,368)中发现了对假设的相当大的支持,使用伪造项目技术来检测伪造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dual Relational Model of Perceived Overqualification: Employee's Self‐Concept and Task Performance Does Interview Anxiety Predict Job Performance and Does it Influence the Predictive Validity of Interviews? Affective Responses to Abuse in the Workplace: The Role of Hope and Affective Commitment Generalization of Cognitive and Noncognitive Validities Across Personality‐Based Job Families Video�?Based Testing: A High�?Fidelity Job Simulation that Demonstrates Reliability, Validity, and Utility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1