Evolution of radiation techniques in the treatment of mediastinal lymphoma: from 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) to intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) using helical tomotherapy (HT): a single-centre experience and review of the literature.

N. Besson, V. Pernin, S. Zefkili, Y. Kirova
{"title":"Evolution of radiation techniques in the treatment of mediastinal lymphoma: from 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) to intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) using helical tomotherapy (HT): a single-centre experience and review of the literature.","authors":"N. Besson, V. Pernin, S. Zefkili, Y. Kirova","doi":"10.1259/bjr.20150409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo evaluate radiation techniques and their toxicity in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with mediastinal disease over a 10-year period.\n\n\nMETHODS\nBetween 2003 and 2015, 173 patients with Stage I-III nodal lymphoma were treated in our institution: some of these patients were irradiated for HL or NHL with mediastinal disease. Some of the patients were treated by three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), others by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).\n\n\nRESULTS\nWe studied 26 males and 43 females with a median age of 26 years. The median follow-up was 43 months. 49 patients were treated by 3DCRT and 20 patients by IMRT. The median dose received by patients treated for NHL was 40 Gy (range: 36-44 Gy), and the median dose received by patients with HL was 30 Gy (range: 30-36 Gy). Between 2003 and 2006, 16 patients were treated by 3DCRT vs 0 patients by IMRT. Between 2007 and 2009, 16 patients received 3DCRT and one patient received IMRT. Between 2010 and 2015, 19 patients received IMRT, and no patients received 3DCRT. 11 of the 20 (55%) patients treated by IMRT and 35 of the 49 (71.4%) patients treated by 3DCRT experienced acute toxicity. Among the patients treated by 3DCRT, one patient experienced Grade 1 radiation pneumonitis and two patients experienced Grade 1 acute mucositis. No late toxicity was observed in patients treated by IMRT.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nImprovement of radiation techniques for HL and NHL appears to have improved acute and late clinical safety. Longer follow-up is necessary to evaluate very late toxicity.\n\n\nADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE\nImprovement of radiation techniques for HL and NHL appears to improve the tolerance.","PeriodicalId":226783,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of radiology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate radiation techniques and their toxicity in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with mediastinal disease over a 10-year period. METHODS Between 2003 and 2015, 173 patients with Stage I-III nodal lymphoma were treated in our institution: some of these patients were irradiated for HL or NHL with mediastinal disease. Some of the patients were treated by three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), others by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). RESULTS We studied 26 males and 43 females with a median age of 26 years. The median follow-up was 43 months. 49 patients were treated by 3DCRT and 20 patients by IMRT. The median dose received by patients treated for NHL was 40 Gy (range: 36-44 Gy), and the median dose received by patients with HL was 30 Gy (range: 30-36 Gy). Between 2003 and 2006, 16 patients were treated by 3DCRT vs 0 patients by IMRT. Between 2007 and 2009, 16 patients received 3DCRT and one patient received IMRT. Between 2010 and 2015, 19 patients received IMRT, and no patients received 3DCRT. 11 of the 20 (55%) patients treated by IMRT and 35 of the 49 (71.4%) patients treated by 3DCRT experienced acute toxicity. Among the patients treated by 3DCRT, one patient experienced Grade 1 radiation pneumonitis and two patients experienced Grade 1 acute mucositis. No late toxicity was observed in patients treated by IMRT. CONCLUSION Improvement of radiation techniques for HL and NHL appears to have improved acute and late clinical safety. Longer follow-up is necessary to evaluate very late toxicity. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Improvement of radiation techniques for HL and NHL appears to improve the tolerance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纵隔淋巴瘤放射治疗技术的发展:从三维适形放疗(3DCRT)到使用螺旋断层治疗(HT)的调强放疗(IMRT):单中心经验和文献综述。
目的评价放射治疗霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)和非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)合并纵隔疾病的10年疗效及其毒性。方法2003年至2015年,我院共收治了173例I-III期淋巴结淋巴瘤患者,其中部分患者因HL或NHL合并纵隔疾病而接受放疗。部分患者行三维适形放疗(3DCRT),部分患者行调强放疗(IMRT)。结果男性26例,女性43例,中位年龄26岁。中位随访时间为43个月。49例采用3DCRT, 20例采用IMRT。NHL患者接受的中位剂量为40 Gy(范围:36-44 Gy), HL患者接受的中位剂量为30 Gy(范围:30-36 Gy)。2003 - 2006年间,16例患者接受3DCRT治疗,0例患者接受IMRT治疗。2007 - 2009年,16例患者接受3DCRT, 1例患者接受IMRT。2010 - 2015年,19例患者接受IMRT,无患者接受3DCRT。20例IMRT患者中有11例(55%)出现急性毒性,49例3DCRT患者中有35例(71.4%)出现急性毒性。在3DCRT治疗的患者中,1例发生了1级放射性肺炎,2例发生了1级急性粘膜炎。经IMRT治疗的患者未见晚期毒性反应。结论改善HL和NHL的放疗技术可提高急性和晚期临床安全性。评估晚期毒性需要更长的随访时间。对HL和NHL的放疗技术的改进似乎提高了耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pearls and pitfalls of structured staging and reporting of rectal cancer on MRI: an international multireader study The diagnostic value of quantitative assessment of MR neurography in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transhepatic or transperitoneal technique for cholecystostomy: results of the multicentre retrospective audit of cholecystostomy and further interventions (MACAFI) Pancreatic cancer, Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence: A Review. Radiomics quality score in renal masses: a systematic assessment on current literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1