{"title":"Policy failure before Covid-19 pandemic and options for the government in near future","authors":"Arijit Dutta, M. Bose","doi":"10.4324/9781003220145-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of Covid-19 pandemic, majority of the Indian states failed miserably in disease surveillance, primarily because of almost a complete policy void in health system and coordination failure in the preceding years. This chapter attempts to analyse the historical traits of health policy matrix of pandemic preparedness and post-epidemic policy interventions in different countries and then look into the sheer neglect of public health in general and epidemic preparedness in particular in India. While recognizing the fact that restrictive policies of quarantine, lockdown and isolation can at best postpone the disease spread, these policies actually could have reduced the burden of epidemic only if the health infrastructure and public health policy matrix were robust enough for inserting correct dose of disease surveillance and treatment. The surveillance mechanism had hit a floor as the public-funded test coverage was low and inadequate in most of the states. The private demand for prevention (in the form of behavioural change and going for detection) could not supplement the overall preventive services. State-wise data analysis identifies that the death rates were very high in some states primarily owing to demographic pattern and prevalence of non-communicable diseases. This indicates that what we need at this hour is not compartmentalized and segregated vertical programmes for specific diseases, but a holistic approach towards health system strengthening, with a renewed focus on public health comprising strict disease surveillances and preventive mechanism. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Rajib Bhattacharyya, Ananya Ghosh Dastidar and Soumyen Sikdar;individual chapters, the contributors.","PeriodicalId":113535,"journal":{"name":"The COVID-19 Pandemic, India and the World","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The COVID-19 Pandemic, India and the World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003220145-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Covid-19大流行前的政策失败和政府在不久的将来的选择
在2019冠状病毒病大流行的背景下,印度大多数邦在疾病监测方面惨败,主要原因是卫生系统几乎完全没有政策空白,前几年协调失败。本章试图分析不同国家流行病准备和流行病后政策干预的卫生政策矩阵的历史特征,然后研究印度对公共卫生的普遍忽视,特别是对流行病准备的忽视。虽然认识到隔离、封锁和隔离的限制性政策充其量只能推迟疾病的传播,但只有在卫生基础设施和公共卫生政策矩阵足够强大、能够插入正确剂量的疾病监测和治疗的情况下,这些政策实际上才能减轻流行病的负担。由于大多数州的公共资助测试覆盖率低且不足,监督机制已经触底。私人对预防的需求(以行为改变和寻求检测的形式)不能补充全面的预防服务。对各州的数据分析表明,一些州的死亡率非常高,这主要是由于人口结构和非传染性疾病的流行。这表明,我们目前需要的不是针对特定疾病的分割和隔离的垂直规划,而是加强卫生系统的整体方法,重新关注公共卫生,包括严格的疾病监测和预防机制。©2022选择和编辑事项,Rajib Bhattacharyya, Ananya Ghosh Dastidar和Soumyen Sikdar;个人章节,贡献者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。