An Examination of the State-of-the-Art for Multivariate Time Series Classification

Bhaskar Dhariyal, T.P Le Nguyen, S. Gsponer, Georgiana Ifrim
{"title":"An Examination of the State-of-the-Art for Multivariate Time Series Classification","authors":"Bhaskar Dhariyal, T.P Le Nguyen, S. Gsponer, Georgiana Ifrim","doi":"10.1109/ICDMW51313.2020.00042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The UEA Multivariate Time Series Classification (MTSC) archive released in 2018 provides an opportunity to evaluate many existing time series classifiers on the MTSC task. Nevertheless, although many new TSC approaches were proposed recently, a comprehensive overview and empirical evaluation of techniques for the MTSC task is currently missing from the time series literature. In this work, we investigate the state-of-the-art for multivariate time series classification using the UEA MTSC benchmark. We compare recent methods originally developed for univariate TSC, to bespoke methods developed for MTSC, ranging from the classic DTW baseline to very recent linear classifiers (e.g., MrSEQL, ROCKET) and deep learning methods (e.g., MLSTM-FCN, TapNet). We aim to understand whether there is any benefit in learning complex dependencies across different time series dimensions versus treating dimensions as independent time series, and we analyse the predictive accuracy, as well as the efficiency of these methods. In addition, we propose a simple statistics-based time series classifier as an alternative to the DTW baseline. We show that our simple classifier is as accurate as DTW, but is an order of magnitude faster. We also find that recent methods that achieve state-of-the-art accuracy for univariate TSC, such as ROCKET, also achieve high accuracy on the MTSC task, but recent deep learning MTSC methods do not perform as well as expected.","PeriodicalId":426846,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW51313.2020.00042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The UEA Multivariate Time Series Classification (MTSC) archive released in 2018 provides an opportunity to evaluate many existing time series classifiers on the MTSC task. Nevertheless, although many new TSC approaches were proposed recently, a comprehensive overview and empirical evaluation of techniques for the MTSC task is currently missing from the time series literature. In this work, we investigate the state-of-the-art for multivariate time series classification using the UEA MTSC benchmark. We compare recent methods originally developed for univariate TSC, to bespoke methods developed for MTSC, ranging from the classic DTW baseline to very recent linear classifiers (e.g., MrSEQL, ROCKET) and deep learning methods (e.g., MLSTM-FCN, TapNet). We aim to understand whether there is any benefit in learning complex dependencies across different time series dimensions versus treating dimensions as independent time series, and we analyse the predictive accuracy, as well as the efficiency of these methods. In addition, we propose a simple statistics-based time series classifier as an alternative to the DTW baseline. We show that our simple classifier is as accurate as DTW, but is an order of magnitude faster. We also find that recent methods that achieve state-of-the-art accuracy for univariate TSC, such as ROCKET, also achieve high accuracy on the MTSC task, but recent deep learning MTSC methods do not perform as well as expected.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多元时间序列分类研究进展
2018年发布的东安格利亚大学多元时间序列分类(MTSC)档案为评估MTSC任务上的许多现有时间序列分类器提供了机会。然而,尽管最近提出了许多新的TSC方法,但目前时间序列文献中缺乏对MTSC任务技术的全面概述和经验评估。在这项工作中,我们研究了使用UEA MTSC基准的多变量时间序列分类的最新技术。我们比较了最初为单变量TSC开发的最新方法,以及为MTSC开发的定制方法,范围从经典的DTW基线到最近的线性分类器(例如,MrSEQL, ROCKET)和深度学习方法(例如,MLSTM-FCN, TapNet)。我们的目标是了解在不同时间序列维度上学习复杂依赖关系与将维度视为独立时间序列是否有任何好处,我们分析了这些方法的预测准确性以及效率。此外,我们提出了一个简单的基于统计的时间序列分类器作为DTW基线的替代方案。我们证明了我们的简单分类器与DTW一样准确,但速度要快一个数量级。我们还发现,最近在单变量TSC上达到最先进精度的方法,如ROCKET,在MTSC任务上也达到了很高的精度,但最近的深度学习MTSC方法的表现不如预期的那么好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synthetic Data by Principal Component Analysis Deep Contextualized Word Embedding for Text-based Online User Profiling to Detect Social Bots on Twitter Integration of Fuzzy and Deep Learning in Three-Way Decisions Mining Heterogeneous Data for Formulation Design Restructuring of Hoeffding Trees for Trapezoidal Data Streams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1