Quantifying the effects of commercial processes on availability of small manned-spacecraft

M. Álvarez, T. Jackson
{"title":"Quantifying the effects of commercial processes on availability of small manned-spacecraft","authors":"M. Álvarez, T. Jackson","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2000.816326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The methodology described herein identifies and quantifies equipment and system level failure modes based on the criticality of their effects on system functionality. This methodology is useful for systems that require high-reliability assessments, such as, spacecraft that are developed with \"faster, better, cheaper\" commercial processes. The authors developed this methodology by integrating the similarity/failure cause analyses methods developed by the International Electrical Commission (1999) with the process grading methods developed by the Reliability Analysis Center (1998). Since the advent of Acquisition Reform in 1994, the authors have studied the effectiveness of many of the \"streamlined\" reliability assessment techniques used in military space programs. What they learned is that every method can be of some use in identifying, mitigating or estimating reliability risk, but selecting the minimal set of methods for a high-reliability assessment requires looking beyond task names. Management organizations must understand how the product-performance objectives are supported by the methods used. Based on the authors' experiences, most spacecraft manufacturers do not practice performance-based reliability assessment methods, and yet they successfully meet or exceeded the predicted availability/reliability of their systems. However, the few satellite and launch vehicles that failed in 1998 and 1999 resulted in billions of dollars of financial losses and managerial shakeups at some major corporations. In general, public opinion is tolerant of these kinds of losses because they are perceived as the cost of doing commercial business in space. That is not the case when failure of a manned Space Shuttle transport occurs. Over the next few years, the commercial spacecraft industry will develop small to medium-size, single-stage manned-spacecraft. Organizations will have to use methods for identifying, mitigating and predicting critical failure modes more accurately than those currently used for unmanned-systems.","PeriodicalId":178321,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2000 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (Cat. No.00CH37055)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2000 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (Cat. No.00CH37055)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2000.816326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The methodology described herein identifies and quantifies equipment and system level failure modes based on the criticality of their effects on system functionality. This methodology is useful for systems that require high-reliability assessments, such as, spacecraft that are developed with "faster, better, cheaper" commercial processes. The authors developed this methodology by integrating the similarity/failure cause analyses methods developed by the International Electrical Commission (1999) with the process grading methods developed by the Reliability Analysis Center (1998). Since the advent of Acquisition Reform in 1994, the authors have studied the effectiveness of many of the "streamlined" reliability assessment techniques used in military space programs. What they learned is that every method can be of some use in identifying, mitigating or estimating reliability risk, but selecting the minimal set of methods for a high-reliability assessment requires looking beyond task names. Management organizations must understand how the product-performance objectives are supported by the methods used. Based on the authors' experiences, most spacecraft manufacturers do not practice performance-based reliability assessment methods, and yet they successfully meet or exceeded the predicted availability/reliability of their systems. However, the few satellite and launch vehicles that failed in 1998 and 1999 resulted in billions of dollars of financial losses and managerial shakeups at some major corporations. In general, public opinion is tolerant of these kinds of losses because they are perceived as the cost of doing commercial business in space. That is not the case when failure of a manned Space Shuttle transport occurs. Over the next few years, the commercial spacecraft industry will develop small to medium-size, single-stage manned-spacecraft. Organizations will have to use methods for identifying, mitigating and predicting critical failure modes more accurately than those currently used for unmanned-systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化商业过程对小型载人航天器可用性的影响
本文所描述的方法基于其对系统功能影响的临界性来识别和量化设备和系统级故障模式。这种方法对于需要高可靠性评估的系统很有用,例如,用“更快、更好、更便宜”的商业过程开发的航天器。作者通过将国际电气委员会(1999)开发的相似/故障原因分析方法与可靠性分析中心(1998)开发的过程分级方法相结合,开发了这种方法。自1994年采编改革以来,作者研究了许多用于军事空间项目的“流线型”可靠性评估技术的有效性。他们学到的是,每种方法在识别、减轻或估计可靠性风险方面都有一定的用处,但是为高可靠性评估选择最小的方法集需要超越任务名称。管理组织必须了解所使用的方法如何支持产品性能目标。根据作者的经验,大多数航天器制造商没有采用基于性能的可靠性评估方法,但他们成功地满足或超过了其系统的预期可用性/可靠性。然而,1998年和1999年的几次卫星和运载火箭发射失败导致了数十亿美元的财务损失和一些大公司的管理层改组。一般来说,公众舆论对这类损失是容忍的,因为它们被视为在太空进行商业活动的成本。当载人航天飞机运输失败时,情况就不是这样了。在接下来的几年里,商业航天器工业将发展中小型、单级载人航天器。组织将不得不使用比目前用于无人系统的方法更准确地识别、减轻和预测关键故障模式的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning to enhance reliability of electronic systems through effective modeling and risk assessment Evaluating the residual risks of infusing new technologies into NASA missions Advisory board - tools for reliability and maintainability practitioners Use of fault tree analysis for evaluation of system-reliability improvements in design phase Power-related failure mechanisms in the analysis of wireless system availability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1