Are We on the Same Page? Modeling Linguistic Synchrony and Math Literacy in Mathematical Discussions

Yukyeong Song, Wanli Xing, Xiaoyi Tian, Chenglu Li
{"title":"Are We on the Same Page? Modeling Linguistic Synchrony and Math Literacy in Mathematical Discussions","authors":"Yukyeong Song, Wanli Xing, Xiaoyi Tian, Chenglu Li","doi":"10.1145/3576050.3576082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mathematical discussions have become a popular educational strategy to promote math literacy. While some studies have associated math literacy with linguistic factors such as verbal ability and phonological skills, no studies have examined the relationship between linguistic synchrony and math literacy. In this study, we modeled linguistic synchrony and students’ math literacy from 20,776 online mathematical discussion threads between students and facilitators. We conducted Cross-Recurrence Quantification Analysis (CRQA) to calculate linguistic synchrony within each thread. The statistical testing result comparing CRQA indices between high and low math literacy groups shows that students with high math literacy have a significantly higher Recurrence Rate (RR), Number of Recurrence Lines (NRLINE), and the average Length of lines (L), but lower Determinism (DET) and normalized Entropy (rENTR). This result implies that students with high math literacy are more likely to share common words with facilitators, but they would paraphrase them. On the other hand, students with low math literacy tend to repeat the exact same phrases from the facilitators. The findings provide a better understanding of mathematical discussions and can potentially guide teachers in promoting effective mathematical discussions.","PeriodicalId":394433,"journal":{"name":"LAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3576050.3576082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Mathematical discussions have become a popular educational strategy to promote math literacy. While some studies have associated math literacy with linguistic factors such as verbal ability and phonological skills, no studies have examined the relationship between linguistic synchrony and math literacy. In this study, we modeled linguistic synchrony and students’ math literacy from 20,776 online mathematical discussion threads between students and facilitators. We conducted Cross-Recurrence Quantification Analysis (CRQA) to calculate linguistic synchrony within each thread. The statistical testing result comparing CRQA indices between high and low math literacy groups shows that students with high math literacy have a significantly higher Recurrence Rate (RR), Number of Recurrence Lines (NRLINE), and the average Length of lines (L), but lower Determinism (DET) and normalized Entropy (rENTR). This result implies that students with high math literacy are more likely to share common words with facilitators, but they would paraphrase them. On the other hand, students with low math literacy tend to repeat the exact same phrases from the facilitators. The findings provide a better understanding of mathematical discussions and can potentially guide teachers in promoting effective mathematical discussions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们在同一页吗?数学讨论中的语言同步建模与数学素养
数学讨论已成为提高数学素养的一种流行的教育策略。虽然一些研究将数学素养与语言能力和语音技能等语言因素联系起来,但没有研究考察语言同步性和数学素养之间的关系。在这项研究中,我们从学生和辅导员之间的20,776个在线数学讨论线程中模拟语言同步性和学生的数学素养。我们进行了交叉递归量化分析(CRQA)来计算每个线程中的语言同步性。比较高、低数学素养组CRQA指标的统计检验结果显示,高数学素养组学生的复发率(RR)、复发线数(NRLINE)和平均线长(L)显著高于高数学素养组,而确定性(DET)和归一化熵(rENTR)显著低于高数学素养组。这一结果表明,数学素养高的学生更有可能与辅导员分享常用词,但他们会对这些常用词进行释义。另一方面,数学水平低的学生倾向于重复老师讲的完全相同的短语。这些发现为数学讨论提供了更好的理解,并可能指导教师促进有效的数学讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blockly-DS: Blocks Programming for Data Science with Visual, Statistical, Descriptive and Predictive Analysis Instructor-in-the-Loop Exploratory Analytics to Support Group Work How to Build More Generalizable Models for Collaboration Quality? Lessons Learned from Exploring Multi-Context Audio-Log Datasets using Multimodal Learning Analytics Fostering Privacy Literacy among High School Students by Leveraging Social Media Interaction and Learning Traces in the Classroom Predicting Students’ Algebra I Performance using Reinforcement Learning with Multi-Group Fairness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1