{"title":"The Financial Crisis and the Response of the United States: Will Dodd Frank Protect Us from the Next Crisis?","authors":"David P. Cluchey","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1831661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In July of 2010 Congress enacted the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd Frank Act”). The Dodd Frank Act is the primary legislative response in the United States to the financial crisis of 2007-09. It makes wide-ranging and significant changes to a number of aspects of financial services regulation. This article examines the eight most significant initiatives undertaken in the Dodd Frank Act; initiatives which are intended to avoid the next financial crisis, to give regulators the tools to deal with a future crisis when it occurs and to substantially increase the levels of protection provided to U.S. consumers of financial services. The Act creates a new Financial Stability Oversight Council with the broad responsibility to anticipate and to take measures to avoid the next financial crisis. It gives to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation the authority to liquidate very large financial services companies in an orderly manner in the event they fail. It creates a new National Insurance Office in the Department of the Treasury to provide limited oversight of our state-regulated insurance industry and, more importantly, to collect information on the risk to the U.S. financial system generated by the failure of the largest insurance companies. It provides for more intensive and effective regulation of credit rating agencies, overseen by a new Office of Credit Ratings at the Securities and Exchange Commission. It imposes registration requirements on hedge fund advisers and provides a process for collecting information on the risks posed to the U.S. financial system by the investment activities of hedge funds. It mandates significant new regulation at the Commodities Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission over the trading of derivatives, requiring exchange-based trading for some classes of derivatives and for transparency in the trading of customized derivatives not suitable for exchanges. It requires a variety of corporate governance reforms for publicly traded companies, including a “say on pay” (a shareholders’ advisory vote on executive compensation plans), increased disclosures to shareholders, independent board compensation committees and consultants, and board risk committees for large financial services companies. Finally, it creates a major new agency, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, located in the Federal Reserve System with significant powers to protect consumers in their purchases of a broad range of financial products. Each of these eight initiatives undertaken in Dodd Frank is complex and dependent to a significant degree on the promulgation of regulations for its implementation. It remains to be seen if these regulations will reflect the spirit of Dodd Frank’s ambitious and serious approach to avoiding or, at least, to providing the tools to survive the next financial crisis. This article offers a summary and some comments on the Dodd Frank initiatives outlined above. The ultimate effect of the Dodd Frank Act will depend to a large extent upon how it is implemented by U.S. financial regulators.","PeriodicalId":166493,"journal":{"name":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1831661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
In July of 2010 Congress enacted the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd Frank Act”). The Dodd Frank Act is the primary legislative response in the United States to the financial crisis of 2007-09. It makes wide-ranging and significant changes to a number of aspects of financial services regulation. This article examines the eight most significant initiatives undertaken in the Dodd Frank Act; initiatives which are intended to avoid the next financial crisis, to give regulators the tools to deal with a future crisis when it occurs and to substantially increase the levels of protection provided to U.S. consumers of financial services. The Act creates a new Financial Stability Oversight Council with the broad responsibility to anticipate and to take measures to avoid the next financial crisis. It gives to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation the authority to liquidate very large financial services companies in an orderly manner in the event they fail. It creates a new National Insurance Office in the Department of the Treasury to provide limited oversight of our state-regulated insurance industry and, more importantly, to collect information on the risk to the U.S. financial system generated by the failure of the largest insurance companies. It provides for more intensive and effective regulation of credit rating agencies, overseen by a new Office of Credit Ratings at the Securities and Exchange Commission. It imposes registration requirements on hedge fund advisers and provides a process for collecting information on the risks posed to the U.S. financial system by the investment activities of hedge funds. It mandates significant new regulation at the Commodities Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission over the trading of derivatives, requiring exchange-based trading for some classes of derivatives and for transparency in the trading of customized derivatives not suitable for exchanges. It requires a variety of corporate governance reforms for publicly traded companies, including a “say on pay” (a shareholders’ advisory vote on executive compensation plans), increased disclosures to shareholders, independent board compensation committees and consultants, and board risk committees for large financial services companies. Finally, it creates a major new agency, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, located in the Federal Reserve System with significant powers to protect consumers in their purchases of a broad range of financial products. Each of these eight initiatives undertaken in Dodd Frank is complex and dependent to a significant degree on the promulgation of regulations for its implementation. It remains to be seen if these regulations will reflect the spirit of Dodd Frank’s ambitious and serious approach to avoiding or, at least, to providing the tools to survive the next financial crisis. This article offers a summary and some comments on the Dodd Frank initiatives outlined above. The ultimate effect of the Dodd Frank Act will depend to a large extent upon how it is implemented by U.S. financial regulators.
2010年7月,国会颁布了《2010年华尔街改革和消费者保护法案》(“多德-弗兰克法案”)。《多德-弗兰克法案》是美国对2007-09年金融危机的主要立法反应。它对金融服务监管的许多方面进行了广泛而重大的改革。本文考察了《多德-弗兰克法案》中最重要的八项举措;这些举措旨在避免下一次金融危机,为监管机构提供应对未来危机的工具,并大幅提高对美国金融服务消费者的保护水平。该法案创建了一个新的金融稳定监督委员会,其广泛职责是预测并采取措施避免下一次金融危机。它赋予联邦存款保险公司在大型金融服务公司破产时有序清算的权力。它在财政部设立了一个新的国家保险办公室,对我们国家监管的保险业提供有限的监督,更重要的是,收集有关大型保险公司倒闭给美国金融体系带来风险的信息。它规定对信用评级机构进行更密集、更有效的监管,由证券交易委员会(sec)新成立的信用评级办公室(Office of credit Ratings)监督。它对对冲基金顾问提出了注册要求,并提供了一个收集对冲基金投资活动对美国金融体系构成风险的信息的程序。它要求美国商品期货交易委员会(cftc)和美国证券交易委员会(sec)对衍生品交易进行重要的新监管,要求某些衍生品的交易基于交易所,并要求不适合在交易所进行的定制衍生品交易具有透明度。它要求对上市公司进行各种公司治理改革,包括“薪酬话语权”(股东对高管薪酬计划的咨询投票),增加对股东、独立董事会薪酬委员会和顾问的披露,以及大型金融服务公司的董事会风险委员会。最后,它创建了一个重要的新机构——消费者金融保护局(Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection),该机构位于联邦储备系统(Federal Reserve System)内,拥有重要的权力来保护消费者购买各种金融产品。《多德-弗兰克法案》中的这八项举措都很复杂,在很大程度上依赖于为实施这些举措而颁布的法规。这些规定是否会反映出《多德-弗兰克法案》雄心勃勃、严肃认真的精神,以避免或至少提供渡过下一次金融危机的工具,还有待观察。本文对上述多德-弗兰克法案提出了一个总结和一些评论。《多德-弗兰克法案》的最终效果将在很大程度上取决于美国金融监管机构如何实施该法案。